scholarly journals Application of the Characteristic Function to Evaluate and Compare Analytical Variability in an External Quality Assessment Scheme for Serum Ethanol

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (7) ◽  
pp. 948-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wim Coucke ◽  
Corine Charlier ◽  
Willy Lambert ◽  
Frank Martens ◽  
Hugo Neels ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND As a cornerstone of quality management in the laboratory, External Quality Assessment (EQA) schemes are used to assess laboratory and analytical method performance. The characteristic function is used to describe the relation between the target concentration and the EQA standard deviation, which is an essential part of the evaluation process. The characteristic function is also used to compare the variability of different analytical methods. METHODS We fitted the characteristic function to data from the Belgian External Quality Assessment program for serum ethanol. Data included results from headspace gas chromatography and the enzymatic methods of Abbott, Roche, Siemens, and Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics. We estimated the characteristic function with weighted nonlinear regression. By introducing dummy variables, we rewrote the original formula of the characteristic function to assess statistical inference for comparing the variability of the different analytical methods. RESULTS The characteristic function fitted the data precisely. Comparison between methods showed that there was little difference between the estimated variability for low concentrations, and that the increase in SD with increasing target concentration was slower for Abbott and Roche than for the other methods. CONCLUSIONS The characteristic function can successfully be introduced in clinical schemes, although its applicability to fit the data should always be assessed. Because of its easy parameterization, it can be used to assess differences in performance between analytical methods and to assess laboratory performance. The characteristic function also offers an alternative framework for coefficients of variation to describe variability of analytical methods.

Author(s):  
R J Georges

Data from 2 years' operation of an External Quality Assessment Scheme covering 14 analytes and with some 60 participants is presented. Following the trimming of discrepant results and statistical ‘outliers' (outside the range of ±3 SD from the mean), there was generally close agreement between consensus mean values for a specimen analysed on different occasions, by different groups of laboratories, or when using different analytical methods. An improvement in performance, indicated by a reduction in the average inter-laboratory coefficient of variation was found for 11 of the 14 analytes over the 2-year period.


2017 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 1277-1287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn Q Burdette ◽  
Johanna E Camara ◽  
Federica Nalin ◽  
Jeanita Pritchett ◽  
Lane C Sander ◽  
...  

Abstract Until recently, the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) assessed the performance of various assays for the determination of serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] by using a consensus mean based on the all-laboratory trimmed mean (ALTM) of the approximately 1000 participants' results. Since October 2012, the National Institute of Standardsand Technology (NIST), as part of the Vitamin D Standardization Program, has participated in DEQAS by analyzing the quarterly serum sample sets using an isotope dilution LC-tandem MS (ID LC-MS/MS) reference measurement procedure to assign an accuracy-based target value for serum total 25(OH)D. NIST has analyzed90 DEQAS samples (18 exercises × 5 samples/exercise) to assign target values. The NIST-assigned values are compared with the ALTM and the biases assessed for various assays used by the participants, e.g., LC-MS/MS, HPLC, and several ligand-binding assays. The NIST-value assignment process and the resultsof the analyses of the 90 DEQAS samples are summarized. The absolute mean bias between the NIST-assignedvalues and the ALTM was 5.6%, with 10% of the samples having biases >10%. Benefits of the accuracy-based target values are presented, including for sample sets with high concentrations of 25(OH)D2 and 3-epi-25(OH)D3.


Author(s):  
Chao-Yang Chen ◽  
Meng-Ya Li ◽  
Ling-Yun Ma ◽  
Xing-Yu Zhai ◽  
Dao-Huang Luo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Vancomycin remains a mainstay of the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections. It is crucial to accurately determine vancomycin serum concentration for adequate dose adjustment. Objectives To evaluate the precision and accuracy of commercial assay techniques for vancomycin concentration and to assess the comparability of vancomycin detection methods in Chinese laboratories. Methods Human serum samples spiked with known concentrations of vancomycin were provided to laboratories participating in the external quality assessment scheme (EQAS). Assay methods included chemiluminescence, enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and so on. The dispersion of the measurements was analysed and the robust coefficient of variation (rCV), relative percentage difference (RPD) and satisfactory rate for method groups were calculated. Moreover, performance of the Chinese laboratories was assessed. Results A total of 657 results from 75 laboratories were collected, including 84 samples from 10 Chinese laboratories. The median rCV, median RPD and satisfactory rates classified by methods ranged from 1.85% to 15.87%, −14.75% to 13.34% and 94.59% to 100.00%, respectively. Significant differences were seen in precision, between kinetic interaction of microparticles in solution (KIMS) and other methods, and in accuracy, between enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT), fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) and other techniques. Vancomycin detection in China mainly depended on the chemiluminescence and EMIT methods, which tended to result in lower measurements. Conclusions Although almost all assays in this study achieved an acceptable performance for vancomycin serum concentration monitoring, obvious inconsistencies between methods were still observed. Chinese laboratories were more likely to underestimate vancomycin concentrations. Thus, recognizing inconsistencies between methods and regular participation in vancomycin EQAS are essential.


2008 ◽  
Vol 182 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ventura ◽  
R. Ventura ◽  
S. Pichini ◽  
S. Leal ◽  
P. Zuccaro ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document