ROBOT-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC RIGHT UPPER LOBECTOMY FOR EARLY STAGE LUNG CANCER – VIDEO PRESENTATION OF ROBOT POSITIONING AND OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE

CHEST Journal ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. 12S
Author(s):  
Farid Gharagozloo ◽  
Marc Margolis ◽  
Eric Strother ◽  
Barbara Tempesta
2009 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 380-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid Gharagozloo ◽  
Marc Margolis ◽  
Barbara Tempesta ◽  
Eric Strother ◽  
Farzad Najam

2008 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 1880-1886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid Gharagozloo ◽  
Marc Margolis ◽  
Barbara Tempesta

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16534-e16534
Author(s):  
Hyun-Sung Lee ◽  
Hee-Jin Jang ◽  
Seong Yong Park ◽  
Jungnam Joo ◽  
Jae Ill Zo

e16534 Background: Robotic surgery has proven to be one of the most effective cutting-edge technologies for successful minimally invasive surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted lobectomy (RAL) for the treatment of early stage lung cancer with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. Methods: From February 2009 to April 2011, one hundred twenty patients underwent RAL for clinical stage I or II non-small cell lung cancer. The consecutive 100 patients who underwent RAL were compared with 100 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy during the similar period under intent-to-treat analysis. Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Adverse events were defined as operative morbidities, mortality and conversion to open thoracotomy. The adverse events were adjusted by NCI-CTCAE 3.0 grade. Incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) was defined as difference of total cost divided by difference of adjusted adverse events. Results: Tumor size was slightly larger in RAL group with 3.2cm in mean size of tumor. RAL needed longer operation time than VATS group. However, the console time during operation was similar with operation time in VATS lobectomy. The median length of postoperative stay was significantly shorter after robotic surgery than VATS. Operative morbidities developed in 9 patients in RAL and 21 in VATS (p=0.028). Conversions to thoracotomy were happened in 2 cases in RAL and 7 cases in VATS (p=0.170). The total hospital costs were higher in RAL than those in VATS ($14,186 vs. $11,509, p<0.001). ICER between RAL and VATS was $16,111 (80% CI; $9,190~$33,860) and NNT (numbers needed to treat) was 6.01. If six patients are treated by RAL, one case of adverse operative events could be diminished and its additional cost is $16,111. Conclusions: Robot-assisted lobectomy for early stage lung cancer is safe as well as feasible, and it results in a satisfying postoperative outcome compared with those after VATS lobectomy. Despite higher total costs, RAL is highly cost-effective to treat early stage lung cancer in National Health Insurance Program of Korea.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. S264-S265
Author(s):  
F. Xu ◽  
L. Yang ◽  
C. Liu ◽  
J. Ying ◽  
Y. Wang

Author(s):  
Guangyao Wu ◽  
Arthur Jochems ◽  
Turkey Refaee ◽  
Abdalla Ibrahim ◽  
Chenggong Yan ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Lung cancer ranks second in new cancer cases and first in cancer-related deaths worldwide. Precision medicine is working on altering treatment approaches and improving outcomes in this patient population. Radiological images are a powerful non-invasive tool in the screening and diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer, treatment strategy support, prognosis assessment, and follow-up for advanced-stage lung cancer. Recently, radiological features have evolved from solely semantic to include (handcrafted and deep) radiomic features. Radiomics entails the extraction and analysis of quantitative features from medical images using mathematical and machine learning methods to explore possible ties with biology and clinical outcomes. Methods Here, we outline the latest applications of both structural and functional radiomics in detection, diagnosis, and prediction of pathology, gene mutation, treatment strategy, follow-up, treatment response evaluation, and prognosis in the field of lung cancer. Conclusion The major drawbacks of radiomics are the lack of large datasets with high-quality data, standardization of methodology, the black-box nature of deep learning, and reproducibility. The prerequisite for the clinical implementation of radiomics is that these limitations are addressed. Future directions include a safer and more efficient model-training mode, merge multi-modality images, and combined multi-discipline or multi-omics to form “Medomics.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document