scholarly journals Sick patients, starved circuits and sticky drugs: understanding pharmacokinetics during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to optimise drug dosing and improve patient outcomes

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran Shekar
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (S5) ◽  
pp. S629-S641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesa Cheng ◽  
Mohd-Hafiz Abdul-Aziz ◽  
Jason A. Roberts ◽  
Kiran Shekar

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. e221
Author(s):  
Niloufar Hafezi ◽  
Troy A. Markel ◽  
Natalie Mark ◽  
Cameron Colgate ◽  
Sarina Masso Maldonado ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-442
Author(s):  
Cristina A. Wojack ◽  
Ashleigh G. VanBlarcom ◽  
Jesus Casida

During the past century, medical technology has evolved to enhance quality and quantity of life. Medications, surgeries, and implantable devices have been developed and enhanced to reduce complications and improve patient outcomes. The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is one of the most substantial advances in life-saving modalities. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been widely used for patients with heart or lung failure across the lifespan. Expansion and simplifications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit designs have informed changes in patient treatment (from bed confinement to ambulatory) and shifted many clinical staffing structures (from cardiovascular perfusionist to nurse-managed care). Highly skilled registered nurses and advanced practice registered nurses are increasingly involved in managing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the critical care setting. The purpose of this article is to highlight the technological evolution of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and the corresponding patient care that bedside registered nurses and advanced practice registered nurses provide.


Perfusion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-109
Author(s):  
Mike Barker ◽  
Alison A Dixon ◽  
Luigi Camporota ◽  
Nick A Barrett ◽  
Ruth Y Y Wan

Introduction: In November 2016, our institution switched from alfentanil to fentanyl for analgesia and sedation in adult patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. There is no published evidence comparing the use of alfentanil with fentanyl for sedation in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. We conducted a retrospective observational study to explore any significant differences in patient outcomes or in the prescribing of adjunct sedatives before and after the switch. Methods: Patients were retrospectively identified from a prospectively recorded database of all patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at our institution between January 2016 and October 2017. Patients included those sedated with alfentanil or fentanyl. The total daily doses of intravenous opioids (alfentanil or fentanyl) were calculated for each patient, and the prescribing of adjunctive sedative or analgesic agents was recorded. Patient demographics, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation modality, clinical outcomes including mortality and length of intensive care and hospital stay were recorded. Results: A total of 174 patients were identified, 69 on alfentanil and 95 on fentanyl. There was no difference found between groups for mode of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2 score (APACHE II) and Charlson score, except for body mass index (p = 0.002). No differences in patient outcomes was observed between groups, although patients in the alfentanil group received a significantly higher median total daily dose of adjuvant sedatives (quetiapine (p = 0.016) and midazolam (p = 0.009)). Conclusions: No differences in patient outcomes were found between extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients sedated with alfentanil compared with fentanyl. There was a statistically significant reduction in some adjunctive sedatives in patients managed with a fentanyl-based regimen. Prospective studies are required to confirm these results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document