scholarly journals Avaliação, Monitoramento e Melhoria da Qualidade na APS

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-143
Author(s):  
Elaine Tomasi ◽  
Fúlvio Borges Nedel ◽  
Allan Claudius Queiroz Barbosa

Esta nota técnica se insere no conjunto de ações desenvolvidas pela Rede de Pesquisa em Atenção Primária à Saúde e apresenta sua posição sobre avaliação, monitoramento e melhoria da qualidade na APS. Em um contexto de grave crise sanitária que desnuda as dificuldades institucionais, financeiras e operativas de resposta à situação de saúde,  situa o debate e traz proposições que fortalecem uma prática avaliativa como instrumento essencial para o aprimoramento e fortalecimento de ações que potencializam o papel da APS no contexto do SUS. Estas notas abordam: a avaliação no contexto da APS em uma perspectiva histórica e institucional que situa sua relevância na própria trajetória do SUS. A importância de compreender os conceitos, métricas e indicadores e apropriá-los ao debate qualificado no âmbito da APS. Uma posição para a Rede APS em termos de desafios e proposições, visando a uma APS mais forte que nunca.   Palavras-chave: APS, Avaliação, Monitoramento, Qualidade.   Abstract This technical report is part of the set of actions developed by the Primary Health Care Research Network and presents its position on evaluation, monitoring and quality improvement in PHC. In a context of serious health crisis that exposes the institutional, financial and operational difficulties in responding to the health situation, it situates the debate and brings proposals that strengthen an evaluative practice as an essential instrument for the improvement and strengthening of actions that enhance the role of PHC in the context of the SUS. These notes address: the assessment in the context of PHC in a historical and institutional perspective that locates its relevance in the trajectory of the SUS. The importance of understanding the concepts, metrics and indicators and appropriating them to the qualified debate within the PHC. A position for the APS Network in terms of challenges and propositions, aiming for a stronger APS than ever. Keywords: PHS, assessing, monitoring, quality.

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. e55687
Author(s):  
Helena Maria Scherlowski Leal David

Editorial sobre a importancia da atenção Primária no contexto da pandemia por covid-19, as ameaças que sofre e o papel da enfermagem.ABSTRACTEditorial aproaching the importance of primary care in the context of the 19-covid pandemic, the threats it suffers and the role of nursing.RESUMENEditorial sobre la importancia de la atención primaria en el contexto de la pandemia del 19-covid, las amenazas que sufre y el papel de la enfermería.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhida Shang ◽  
Justin Gagnon ◽  
Vera Granikov ◽  
Rosario Rodriguez ◽  
Pierre Pluye

Background: The McGill Primary Health Care Research Network (the Network) is a Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) that promotes the collaboration between researchers and clinicians in research. The Network follows an approach called Organizational Participatory Research (OPR).Purpose: To discover the processes and outcomes associated with the Network, to learn about researcher and clinician collaboration within the Network and to propose recommendations and a revised questionnaire.Methods: A thematic qualitative data analysis was conducted. The data that was analyzed consisted of the diaries of two diaries of two Network coordinators, email correspondence between the core group members and the coordinators, and the minutes of 12 core group meetings. The data were interpreted according to the Capacity Building Framework. Then, codes were organized according to 10 framework-based meta-themes (5 domain-related processes, and 5 domain-related outcomes) and grouped in 24 key-themes (key processes and outcomes).Results: A leadership process was researchers promoting communication within the Network which resulted in clinicians becoming project leaders. An organizational development outcome was members' research projects being completed. Partnership processes involved researchers and clinicians identifying their respective challenges to partnerships. The main outcome was collaboration. Resource allocation processes included time and funding management, with accommodation to time constraints as an outcome. Workforce development processes included researchers educating clinicians, which resulted in networking core group members and positive learning experiences.  Conclusions: The results suggested practice and policy recommendations. Based on the results, an improved mailing policy, a wiki/blog, a more humble approach for researchers and a questionnaire were proposed.


2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 414-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kadija Perreault ◽  
Antoine Boivin ◽  
Enette Pauzé ◽  
Amanda L. Terry ◽  
Christie Newton ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemare Troskie

The Reconstruction and Development Plan as well as the National Health Plan of the ANC supports the reorganisation of health services. OpsommingDie Heropbou en Ontwikkelingsprogram sowel as die Nasionale Gesondheidsplan van die ANC staan die herorganisasie van gesondheidsdienste voor. *Please note: This is a reduced version of the abstract. Please refer to PDF for full text.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsbet Lodenstein ◽  
Eric Mafuta ◽  
Adolphe C. Kpatchavi ◽  
Jean Servais ◽  
Marjolein Dieleman ◽  
...  

1975 ◽  
Vol 52 (11) ◽  
pp. 774-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert N. Kleinstein ◽  
Herman F. Lehman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document