Incontinence and Anal Sphincter Pressure Predicts Rectal Sensitivity During High Resolution Anorectal Manometry

2009 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. S485
Author(s):  
David Yamini ◽  
Jeffrey Conklin ◽  
Mark Pimentel
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Attari ◽  
William D. Chey ◽  
Jason R. Baker ◽  
James A. Ashton-Miller

AbstractThere is a need for a lower cost manometry system for assessing anorectal function in primary and secondary care settings. We developed an index finger-based system (termed “digital manometry”) and tested it in healthy volunteers, patients with chronic constipation, and fecal incontinence. Anorectal pressures were measured in 16 participants with the digital manometry system and a 23-channel high-resolution anorectal manometry system. The results were compared using a Bland-Altman analysis at rest as well as during maximum squeeze and simulated defecation maneuvers. Myoelectric activity of the puborectalis muscle was also quantified simultaneously using the digital manometry system. The limits of agreement between the two methods were −7.1 ± 25.7 mmHg for anal sphincter resting pressure, 0.4 ± 23.0 mmHg for the anal sphincter pressure change during simulated defecation, −37.6 ± 50.9 mmHg for rectal pressure changes during simulated defecation, and −20.6 ± 172.6 mmHg for anal sphincter pressure during the maximum squeeze maneuver. The change in the puborectalis myoelectric activity was proportional to the anal sphincter pressure increment during a maximum squeeze maneuver (slope = 0.6, R2 = 0.4). Digital manometry provided a similar evaluation of anorectal pressures and puborectalis myoelectric activity at an order of magnitude less cost than high-resolution manometry, and with a similar level of patient comfort. Digital Manometry provides a simple, inexpensive, point of service means of assessing anorectal function in patients with chronic constipation and fecal incontinence.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Kristina Crafoord ◽  
Jan Brynhildsen ◽  
Olof Hallböök ◽  
Preben Kjølhede

The aim of this study was to evaluate associations between anal sphincter pressure and stage of prolapse and bowel and prolapse symptoms among women undergoing prolapse surgery and to determine whether anal sphincter pressure could predict symptomatic and anatomical outcomes of prolapse surgery. Fortytwo women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) stage 2-3 were included in this prospective longitudinal study. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by means of a symptom questionnaire, clinical examination and anorectal manometry. The vaginal prolapse surgery included at the very least posterior colporrhaphy. Analysis of variance and covariance and logistic regression models were used for statistical analyses. The anal sphincter pressure at rest and squeeze was significantly lower in women with the symptom vaginal protrusion than in the women without the symptom. No associations were found between anal sphincter pressure and the extent or degree of prolapse or subjective and anatomical outcomes of POP surgery. The prolapse symptom vaginal protrusion is associated with a low anal sphincter pressure but the anal sphincter pressure does not seem to predict the outcome of POP surgery, neither regarding symptoms nor anatomy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khoa Tran ◽  
Brad Kuo ◽  
Audrius Zibaitis ◽  
Somaletha Bhattacharya ◽  
Charles Cote ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 625-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. V. Carrington ◽  
A. Brokjaer ◽  
H. Craven ◽  
N. Zarate ◽  
E. J. Horrocks ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. S-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma V Carrington ◽  
Anthony Hobson ◽  
Charles H. Knowles ◽  
Peter J. Lunniss ◽  
S. Mark Scott

Neurosurgery ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 562-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dachling Pang ◽  
Kenneth Casey

Abstract The distinction of sacral roots and conus medullaris from lipoma, fibrous adhesions, and an abnormally thickened filum terminale can be difficult during operations on certain complicated dysraphic lesions. We describe a simple, noninvasive method of monitoring external anal sphincter “squeeze pressure” by means of an elongated, fluid-filled, polyethylene anal balloon connected to a pressure transducer. Cutaneous electrocardiographic (ECG) leads on both hips register the stimulus artifact from a monopolar nerve stimulator. The simultaneous display on the oscilloscope screen of the stimulus artifact and the resultant pressure response form an electromechanical coupling that allows the operator to identify a faulty stimulator probe and to distinguish true stimulus-induced external anal sphincter activity from spontaneous rhythmic contractions of the internal anal sphincter. Unilateral stimulation of the S-2, S-3, and S-4 roots generates tall pressure spikes between 40 and 75 torr in peak amplitudes, whereas S-1 and L-5 stimulation produces a stimulus artifact on the ECG but either no pressure response or a mere “ripple wave” of less than 7 torr. During operations on 11 patients with various dysraphic lesions, the S-2, S-3, and S-4 roots were identified easily and preserved, and the caudal extent of functioning neurons was localized within coni grossly distorted by intramedullary lipoma or chronic tethering. We prefer the anal sphincter pressure monitor to anal sphincter electromyography because of its simplicity, the inexpensive equipment, and its noise-free display that is virtually unaffected by other electronic systems in the operating room.


2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 1284-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margot S. Damaser ◽  
Levilester Salcedo ◽  
Guangjian Wang ◽  
Paul Zaszczurynski ◽  
Michelle A. Cruz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document