scholarly journals The first and only combination of basal and prandial insulin analogs degludec and aspart: the position of Russian endocrinologists

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-184
Author(s):  
M. V. Shestakova ◽  
E. V. Surkova ◽  
A. A. Vachugova ◽  
I. A. Ipatko ◽  
E. E. Kazakova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Therapy ◽  
Insulin Aspart ◽  
Insulin Analogue ◽  
Insulin Analogs ◽  
Prandial Insulin ◽  
Acting Insulin ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

Insulin therapy for diabetes mellitus is the most effective way to control glycemia with the progression of the disease and the ineffectiveness of other sugar-lowering drugs. At the same time, the existing limitations of traditional insulin preparations, along with increasing attention to the individualized treatment of this disease, are pushing developers to create drugs that most closely reproduce the effect of natural human insulin. In this regard, the appearance of a combination of insulin analogs, the action profile of which practically imitates insulin secretion by a healthy pancreas, presents new possibilities in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Insulin degludec / insulin aspart (IDegAsp, Ryzodeg®, Novo Nordisk, Denmark) is the first and only soluble combination preparation containing 70% of the ultra-long-acting insulin analogue degludec and 30% of the ultra-short-acting insulin analogue aspart in one injection, which meets the need for both basal and prandial insulin. The combined drug has nothing in common with traditional mixed insulin preparations (both human and analog) and provides doctors and patients with significant advantages over the latter. The article presents the position of Russian experts-diabetologists with extensive experience in the use of IDegAsp regarding the role and place of the drug in real clinical practice. Data from real clinical practice confirm that IDegAsp is a reasonable choice for starting and intensifying insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus when basal and prandial glycemic control is required. The use of the drug is most appropriate in patients who are on basal, biphasic, basal-plus/basal-bolus regimens and who do not achieve the goals of glycemic control during prior therapy. One of the leading reasons for choosing IDegAsp may also be a lower risk of developing hypoglycemia compared to insulin analogues of previous generations — biphasic insulin aspart and basal insulin glargine 100 U/ml. In addition, IDegAsp is a simple, flexible and safe insulin therapy for patients on premix therapy and basal-plus/basis-bolus regimens who require basal and prandial glycemic control. IDegAsp is a simple, flexible and safe insulin therapy. The greatest benefit of this drug use can be obtained by patients for whom adherence to a complex therapy regimen is difficult (the elderly, with cognitive impairment, after a stroke, with dementia), as well as patients who have an active lifestyle, accompanied by irregular food intake. It is important to note that since January 1, 2021, there is no need for a decision by a special medical commission to prescribe (IDegAsp) Ryzodeg®. This fact, as well as a significant price reduction at the end of 2020, opens up broader prospects for using the drug in the routine practice of a Russian endocrinologist.

scholarly journals Characteristics of insulin therapy of diabetes mellitus type 1 in children and adolescents receiving glucocorticoids

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-273
Author(s):  
Alisa V. Vitebskaya ◽  
Anastaiya V. Popovich ◽  
Elena Y. Afonina ◽  
Yuliya O. Kostina ◽  
Karina V. Aleksanyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Therapy ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus Type ◽  
Insulin Requirements ◽  
Acting Insulin ◽  
High Doses

BACKGROUND: In coexistence of diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) with severe autoimmune and inflammatory diseases some patients need simultaneous administration of insulin and glucocorticoids (GC). GC therapy in patients with DM1 can worsen glycemic control. AIM: To determine characteristics of insulin therapy of DM1 in children and adolescents receiving GC. DESCRIPTION OF CLINICAL CASES: We observed 5 patients with DM1 receiving GC for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), juvenile systemic sclerosis (JSS), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), ulcerative colitis (UC), and reactive arthritis (RA). Intra-articular administration of GC did not significantly influence glycemic control. In case of GC pulse therapy hyperglycemia and increased insulin requirements were recognized in 36 hours after GC receipt, persisted from few hours up to 3 days after each administration. While therapy with oral GC in high doses the worst glycemic control was registered in daylight hours. To overcome insulin resistance change of time of injection and 10%-increase of long-acting insulin analogue, additional injections of ultrashort-acting insulin analogues, temporal prescription of short-acting human insulin were used. While GC therapy insulin daily dose was individual and could reach 2.0 U/kg. After transition to maintaining doses of GC or discontinuation of GC therapy patients returned to standard or relatively low insulin requirements. Levels of glycosylated hemoglobin differed significantly among patients at different stages of treatment, were maximal while long-term therapy with high doses of oral GC, but mostly depended on patients compliance. CONCLUSION: Bettering of glycemic control while receiving GC can be reached by timely dose correction of insulin therapy, selection of individual schemes, taking into account time of receipt and pharmacokinetic characteristics of GC. Adherence of the patient and his family to treatment of DM1 plays an important role in glycemic control.

scholarly journals Insulin degludec/insulin aspart is the first co-formulation of basal and prandial insulin analogues

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 108-119
Author(s):  
Ivan Ivanovich Dedov ◽  
Marina Vladimirovna Shestakova
Keyword(s):  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Therapy ◽  
Insulin Aspart ◽  
Basal Insulin ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Insulin Analogues ◽  
Insulin Degludec ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Prandial Insulin ◽  
Basal Bolus

Achievement of glycemic control is the major therapeutic aim to prevent or delay the onset and progression of diabetes related complications. Insulin therapy represents a cornerstone in the treatment of diabetes and has been used widely for achieving glycemic goals. The aim for insulin therapy is to mimic the physiological profile of insulin secretion seen in nondiabetic patients. Development of the insulin analogs has offered new opportunities in the diabetes management to achieve greater safety and tolerability of diabetes treatment. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart(IDegAsp) (Ryzodeg?, Novo Nordisk, Denmark) is the first soluble co-formulation of 70% ultra-long acting insulin degludec and 30% rapid-acting prandial insulin aspart, providing both basal insulin coverage and a prandial insulin bolus in a single injection. This review discusses data regarding the efficacy, safety, tolerability and clinical benefits of IDegAsp. According to the clinical development program IDegAspprovides an achievement of similar glycemic control with superiority in lowering FPG with using less number of injections and lower daily insulin dose, and also associated with numerically lower rates of confirmed and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia in comparison with premixed or basal insulin analogues, as well as a basal component for basal?bolus therapy with supplementary mealtime insulin aspart.Trial results suggest that IDegAspQD or BID maybe an appropriate and reasonable option for initiating insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled on maximal doses of oral antidiabetic drugs,and also a simple alternative to basal?bolus treatment in patients who require intensification of insulin therapy, especially when adherence to more complex regimens is challenging.

scholarly journals Usage of glucometer with mobile application in real clinical practice

2020 ◽  
pp. 120-125
Author(s):  
A. V. Vitebskaya
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Mobile Application ◽  
Insulin Dose ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus Type ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

Introduction. Glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) can be held using glucometer with mobile application, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and intermediately scanned CGM (isCGM). isCGM do not need calibration with glucometer as CGM, but its usage in children and adolescents is recommended only together with glucometer.Aim: to study characteristics of glucometer usage in real clinical practice in a patient which utilizes glucometer with mobile application and is CGM simultaneously.Materials and methods. A 17-year-old girl with diabetes mellitus type 1 was advised to use isCGM together with glucometer Contour Plus One (ISO 15197:2013) and mobile application Contour Diabetes.Results. The first three months, while insulin dose titration and education, the patient used glucometer 1–9 times a day (3.0 (2.0; 4.0)), filled in diary. These led to decrease of glycaemia (10.7 (5.5; 14.7) – 7.8 (5.2; 9.5) mmol/L) and variability (56–45%), increase of percent of measurements within range (38–57%), according to glucometer; decrease of mean glycaemia (11.8–8.5 mmol/L) and increase of time in range (TIR) (14–59%), according to isCGM. The next three months, while diabetes mellitus type 1 compensation, according to glucometer (glycaemia 6.9 (4.9; 9.7) mmol/L, variability 48%, percent of measurements within range 71%) and isCGM (mean glycaemia mean glycaemia 7.3 mmol/L, TIR 67%), the patient stopped to fill in diary, decreased number of measurements by glucometer to 1.0 (1.0; 2.0) times a day. Mean month glycaemia was 5.5–9.8% lower according to glucometer than isCGM. The patient used glucometer in cases with relatively high risk of hypoglycemia more often.Conclusion. Usage of glucometer with mobile application can increase adherence to treatment. If glucometer and isCGM used simultaneously the patients measure glycaemia with glucometer in cases of decompensated diabetes mellitus type 1 and while insulin titration more often. Mean month glycaemia according to glucometer, if used every day, corresponds with isCGM data. We must discuss with patients circumstances when they use glucometer because this can influence glycemic control indicators in mobile application reports.

scholarly journals Insulin doses requirements in patients with type 1 diabetes using glargine U300 or degludec in routine clinical practice

2021 ◽  
pp. jim-2020-001633
Author(s):  
Florentino Carral San Laureano ◽  
Mariana Tomé Fernández-Ladreda ◽  
Ana Isabel Jiménez Millán ◽  
Concepción García Calzado ◽  
María del Carmen Ayala Ortega
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Glycosylated Hemoglobin ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Insulin Analogs ◽  
Total P ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

There are not many real-world studies evaluating daily insulin doses requirements (DIDR) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using second-generation basal insulin analogs, and such comparison is necessary. The aim of this study was to compare DIDR in individuals with T1D using glargine 300 UI/mL (IGlar-300) or degludec (IDeg) in real clinical practice. An observational, retrospective study was designed in 412 patients with T1D (males: 52%; median age 37.0±13.4 years, diabetes duration: 18.7±12.3 years) using IDeg and IGla-300 ≥6 months to compare DIDR between groups. Patients using IGla-300 (n=187) were more frequently males (59% vs 45.8%; p=0.004) and had lower glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (7.6±1.2 vs 8.1%±1.5%; p<0.001) than patients using IDeg (n=225). Total (0.77±0.36 unit/kg/day), basal (0.43±0.20 unit/kg/day) and prandial (0.33±0.23 unit/kg/day) DIDR were similar in IGla-300 and IDeg groups. Patients with HbA1c ≤7% (n=113) used significantly lower basal (p=0.045) and total (p=0.024) DIDR, but not prandial insulin (p=0.241), than patients with HbA1c between 7.1% and 8% and >8%. Patients using IGla-300 and IDeg used similar basal, prandial and total DIDR regardless of metabolic control subgroup. No difference in basal, prandial and total DIDR was observed between patients with T1D using IGla-300 or IDeg during at least 6 months in routine clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document