Telemetry Overuse and the Effect of Educational and Electronic Health Record-Based Interventions on an Academic Internal Medicine Ward

2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (9) ◽  
pp. 572-576
Author(s):  
Peter Caldwell ◽  
Logan Davies ◽  
Martin White ◽  
P. Adam Kelly ◽  
Jonathan Orner
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. e143-e150
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Long ◽  
Ming Tai-Seale ◽  
Robert El-Kareh ◽  
Jeffrey E. Lee ◽  
Sally L. Baxter

Abstract Background As electronic health record (EHR) use becomes more widespread, detailed records of how users interact with the EHR, known as EHR audit logs, are being used to characterize the clinical workflows of physicians including residents. After-hours EHR use is of particular interest given its known association with physician burnout. Several studies have analyzed EHR audit logs for residents in other fields, such as internal medicine, but none thus far in ophthalmology. Here, we focused specifically on EHR use during on-call shifts outside of normal clinic hours. Methods In this retrospective study, we analyzed raw EHR audit log data from on-call shifts for 12 ophthalmology residents at a single institution over the course of a calendar year. Data were analyzed to characterize total time spent using the EHR, clinical volume, diagnoses of patients seen on call, and EHR tasks. Results Across all call shifts, the median and interquartile range (IQR) of the time spent logged into the EHR per shift were 88 and 131 minutes, respectively. The median (IQR) unique patient charts accessed per shift was 7 (9) patients. When standardized to per-hour measures, weekday evening shifts were the busiest call shifts with regard to both EHR use time and clinical volume. Total EHR use time and clinical volume were greatest in the summer months (July to September). Chart review comprised a majority (63.4%) of ophthalmology residents' on-call EHR activities. Conclusion In summary, EHR audit logs demonstrate substantial call burden for ophthalmology residents outside of regular clinic hours. These data and future studies can be used to further characterize the clinical exposure and call burden of ophthalmology residents and could potentially have broader implications in the fields of physician burnout and education policy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Donnelly ◽  
Janelle M. Clauser ◽  
Rochelle E. Tractenberg

Abstract Background End-of-residency outpatient handoffs affect at least 1 million patients per year, yet there is no consensus on best practices. Objective To explore the use of formal systems for end-of-residency clinic handoffs in internal medicine–pediatrics residency (Med-Peds) programs, and their associated categorical internal medicine and pediatrics programs. Methods We surveyed Med-Peds program directors about their programs' system for handing off ambulatory continuity patients. Results Our response rate was 85% (67 of 79 programs). Thirty-one programs (46%) reported having a system for end-of-residency handoffs. Of the 30 that offered detailed information, 22 (73%) formally introduced the program to residents, 12 (40%) standardized the handoff, and 14 (47%) used multiple methods for information exchange, with the electronic health record and oral transfer of information (15 of 30, 50%) the most common. Six programs (20%) indicated they did not offer residents protected time to complete end-of-residency handoffs, and 13 programs (43%) did not identify a specific postgraduate year level for residents to whom patients were handed off. Programs were more likely to have a system for end-of-residency handoffs if another categorical program at their institution also had one (P < .001). Conclusions Fewer than half of responding Med-Peds programs have outpatient handoff systems in place. Inclusion of end-of-residency handoff information in the electronic health record may represent a best practice that has the potential of enhancing continuity and safety of care for patients in resident continuity clinics.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 525-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Stewart ◽  
Daniel Kahn ◽  
Edward Lee ◽  
Wendy Simon ◽  
Mark Duncan ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan Gilleland ◽  
Katherine Komis ◽  
Sonya Chawla ◽  
Stephen Fernandez ◽  
Mary Fishman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education expects resident duty hours to be monitored, yet no previous studies have examined the effect of after-hours electronic health record (EHR) use on resident hours or burnout. Objective We assessed internal medicine residents' perceived and actual time spent on after-hours outpatient EHR use and calculated increased duty hours if after-hours EHR use were included; we also assessed its effect on resident burnout. Methods We retrospectively aggregated time spent logged on to the outpatient EHR for residents in a general internal medicine clinic for 13 weeks in 2011. Residents completed a survey on EHR use, which was correlated with objectively recorded data on EHR usage. We compared actual and self-reported EHR time and identified violations that would be generated if these hours were included in reported duty hours. We also correlated resident after-hours EHR use with responses to an internally developed burnout survey. Results The 44 residents in this study overestimated time spent on the ambulatory EHR (they spent 3.03 hours/week on after-hours use compared with a recorded 1.20 hours/week). In total, 190 duty hour violations (mean duration of violation  =  37 minutes) would have been generated if after-hours EHR usage were included in residents' reported duty hours. Conclusions Resident estimates of EHR use by residents were not accurate; including after-hours EHR use would increase the number of reported duty hour violations. There was no association between after-hours EHR use and resident burnout.


2019 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Baidy S. Y. Kane ◽  
Mamour Gueye ◽  
Mohamed Dieng ◽  
Atoumane Faye ◽  
Awa Cheikh Ndao ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin Rajkomar ◽  
Sumant R. Ranji ◽  
Bradley Sharpe

ABSTRACT Background  An important component of internal medicine residency is clinical immersion in core rotations to expose first-year residents to common diagnoses. Objective  Quantify intern experience with common diagnoses through clinical documentation in an electronic health record. Methods  We analyzed all clinical notes written by postgraduate year (PGY) 1, PGY-2, and PGY-3 residents on medicine service at an academic medical center July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2014. We quantified the number of notes written by PGY-1s at 1 of 3 hospitals where they rotate, by the number of notes written about patients with a specific principal billing diagnosis, which we defined as diagnosis-days. We used the International Classification of Diseases 9 (ICD-9) and the Clinical Classification Software (CCS) to group the diagnoses. Results  We analyzed 53 066 clinical notes covering 10 022 hospitalizations with 1436 different ICD-9 diagnoses spanning 217 CCS diagnostic categories. The 10 most common ICD-9 diagnoses accounted for 23% of diagnosis-days, while the 10 most common CCS groupings accounted for more than 40% of the diagnosis-days. Of 122 PGY-1s, 107 (88%) spent at least 2 months on the service, and 3% were exposed to all of the top 10 ICD-9 diagnoses, while 31% had experience with fewer than 5 of the top 10 diagnoses. In addition, 17% of PGY-1s saw all top 10 CCS diagnoses, and 5% had exposure to fewer than 5 CCS diagnoses. Conclusions  Automated detection of clinical experience may help programs review inpatient clinical experiences of PGY-1s.


ACI Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. e1-e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Micek ◽  
Brian Arndt ◽  
Wen-Jan Tuan ◽  
Elizabeth Trowbridge ◽  
Shannon M. Dean ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rates of burnout among physicians have been high in recent years. The electronic health record (EHR) is implicated as a major cause of burnout. Objective This article aimed to determine the association between physician burnout and timing of EHR use in an academic internal medicine primary care practice. Methods We conducted an observational cohort study using cross-sectional and retrospective data. Participants included primary care physicians in an academic outpatient general internal medicine practice. Burnout was measured with a single-item question via self-reported survey. EHR time was measured using retrospective automated data routinely captured within the institution's EHR. EHR time was separated into four categories: weekday work-hours in-clinic time, weekday work-hours out-of-clinic time, weekday afterhours time, and weekend/holiday after-hours time. Ordinal regression was used to determine the relationship between burnout and EHR time categories. Results EHR use during in-clinic sessions was related to burnout in both bivariate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.06; p = 0.007) and adjusted (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.1; p = 0.001) analyses. No significant relationships were found between burnout and after-hours EHR use. Conclusion In this small single-institution study, physician burnout was associated with higher levels of in-clinic EHR use but not after-hours EHR use. Improved understanding of the variability of in-clinic EHR use, and the EHR tasks that are particularly burdensome to physicians, could help lead to interventions that better integrate EHR demands with clinical care and potentially reduce burnout. Further studies including more participants from diverse clinical settings are needed to further understand the relationship between burnout and after-hours EHR use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document