Internal medicine progress note writing attitudes and practices in an electronic health record

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 525-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Stewart ◽  
Daniel Kahn ◽  
Edward Lee ◽  
Wendy Simon ◽  
Mark Duncan ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. e143-e150
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Long ◽  
Ming Tai-Seale ◽  
Robert El-Kareh ◽  
Jeffrey E. Lee ◽  
Sally L. Baxter

Abstract Background As electronic health record (EHR) use becomes more widespread, detailed records of how users interact with the EHR, known as EHR audit logs, are being used to characterize the clinical workflows of physicians including residents. After-hours EHR use is of particular interest given its known association with physician burnout. Several studies have analyzed EHR audit logs for residents in other fields, such as internal medicine, but none thus far in ophthalmology. Here, we focused specifically on EHR use during on-call shifts outside of normal clinic hours. Methods In this retrospective study, we analyzed raw EHR audit log data from on-call shifts for 12 ophthalmology residents at a single institution over the course of a calendar year. Data were analyzed to characterize total time spent using the EHR, clinical volume, diagnoses of patients seen on call, and EHR tasks. Results Across all call shifts, the median and interquartile range (IQR) of the time spent logged into the EHR per shift were 88 and 131 minutes, respectively. The median (IQR) unique patient charts accessed per shift was 7 (9) patients. When standardized to per-hour measures, weekday evening shifts were the busiest call shifts with regard to both EHR use time and clinical volume. Total EHR use time and clinical volume were greatest in the summer months (July to September). Chart review comprised a majority (63.4%) of ophthalmology residents' on-call EHR activities. Conclusion In summary, EHR audit logs demonstrate substantial call burden for ophthalmology residents outside of regular clinic hours. These data and future studies can be used to further characterize the clinical exposure and call burden of ophthalmology residents and could potentially have broader implications in the fields of physician burnout and education policy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (01) ◽  
pp. 103-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Jalota ◽  
M. R. Aryal ◽  
M. Mahmood ◽  
T. Wasser ◽  
A. Donato

SummaryObjective: To determine comfort when using the Electronic Health Record (EHR) and increase in documentation efficiency after an educational intervention for physicians to improve their transition to a new EHR.Methods: This study was a single-center randomized, parallel, non-blinded controlled trial of real-time, focused educational interventions by physician peers in addition to usual training in the intervention arm compared with usual training in the control arm. Participants were 44 internal medicine physi cians and residents stratified to groups using a survey of comfort with electronic media during rollout of a system-wide EHR and order entry system. Outcomes were median time to complete a progress note, notes completed after shift, and comfort with EHR at 20 and 40 shifts.Results: In the intervention group, 73 education sessions averaging 14.4 (SD: 7.7) minutes were completed with intervention group participants, who received an average of 3.47 (SD: 2.1) interventions. Intervention group participants decreased their time to complete a progress note more quickly than controls over 30 shifts (p < 0.001) and recorded significantly fewer progress notes after scheduled duty hours (77 versus 292, p < 0.001). Comfort with EHRs increased significantly in both groups from baseline but did not differ significantly by group. Intervention group participants felt that the intervention was more helpful than their standard training (3.47 versus 1.95 on 4-point scale).Conclusion: Physicians teaching physicians during clinical work improved physician efficiency but not comfort with EHRs. More study is needed to determine best methods to assist those most challenged with new EHR rollouts.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (03) ◽  
pp. 589-596
Author(s):  
Kimberly Whalen ◽  
Pat Grella ◽  
Colleen Snydeman ◽  
Ann-Marie Dwyer ◽  
Phoebe Yager

Abstract Objective Based on feedback from nurses regarding the challenges of code documentation following the implementation of a new electronic health record (EHR), we sought to better understand inpatient nurse attitudes and practices in code documentation and to identify opportunities for improvement. Methods An anonymous electronic survey was distributed to all inpatient nurses working at a single, 999-bed, university-based, and quaternary care hospital. Participation in the study was voluntary and consent was implied by survey completion. Results Overall, 432 (14%) of 3,121 inpatient nurses completed the survey. While nearly 80% of respondents indicated feeling very comfortable using computers for personal use, only 5% felt very comfortable navigating the EHR to document codes in real time. While 53% had documented codes in the new EHR, most admitted to documenting on paper with retroactive entry into the EHR. About 25% reported having participated in a code that was not accurately documented in the new EHR. All respondents provided specific suggestions for improving the EHR interface, and over 90% expressed interest in having opportunities to practice code documentation using simulated code events. Conclusion Despite completion of training modules in code documentation in a new EHR, many inpatient nurses in a single institution feel uncomfortable documenting codes directly into the EHR, and some question the accuracy of this documentation. Improving EHR functionality based on specific recommendations from end-users coupled with more practice documenting simulated codes may ease EHR navigation, leading to nurses' acceptance of the EHR tool, more accurate and efficient documentation, greater nurse satisfaction and more appropriate quality improvement measures.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Donnelly ◽  
Janelle M. Clauser ◽  
Rochelle E. Tractenberg

Abstract Background End-of-residency outpatient handoffs affect at least 1 million patients per year, yet there is no consensus on best practices. Objective To explore the use of formal systems for end-of-residency clinic handoffs in internal medicine–pediatrics residency (Med-Peds) programs, and their associated categorical internal medicine and pediatrics programs. Methods We surveyed Med-Peds program directors about their programs' system for handing off ambulatory continuity patients. Results Our response rate was 85% (67 of 79 programs). Thirty-one programs (46%) reported having a system for end-of-residency handoffs. Of the 30 that offered detailed information, 22 (73%) formally introduced the program to residents, 12 (40%) standardized the handoff, and 14 (47%) used multiple methods for information exchange, with the electronic health record and oral transfer of information (15 of 30, 50%) the most common. Six programs (20%) indicated they did not offer residents protected time to complete end-of-residency handoffs, and 13 programs (43%) did not identify a specific postgraduate year level for residents to whom patients were handed off. Programs were more likely to have a system for end-of-residency handoffs if another categorical program at their institution also had one (P &lt; .001). Conclusions Fewer than half of responding Med-Peds programs have outpatient handoff systems in place. Inclusion of end-of-residency handoff information in the electronic health record may represent a best practice that has the potential of enhancing continuity and safety of care for patients in resident continuity clinics.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan Gilleland ◽  
Katherine Komis ◽  
Sonya Chawla ◽  
Stephen Fernandez ◽  
Mary Fishman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education expects resident duty hours to be monitored, yet no previous studies have examined the effect of after-hours electronic health record (EHR) use on resident hours or burnout. Objective We assessed internal medicine residents' perceived and actual time spent on after-hours outpatient EHR use and calculated increased duty hours if after-hours EHR use were included; we also assessed its effect on resident burnout. Methods We retrospectively aggregated time spent logged on to the outpatient EHR for residents in a general internal medicine clinic for 13 weeks in 2011. Residents completed a survey on EHR use, which was correlated with objectively recorded data on EHR usage. We compared actual and self-reported EHR time and identified violations that would be generated if these hours were included in reported duty hours. We also correlated resident after-hours EHR use with responses to an internally developed burnout survey. Results The 44 residents in this study overestimated time spent on the ambulatory EHR (they spent 3.03 hours/week on after-hours use compared with a recorded 1.20 hours/week). In total, 190 duty hour violations (mean duration of violation  =  37 minutes) would have been generated if after-hours EHR usage were included in residents' reported duty hours. Conclusions Resident estimates of EHR use by residents were not accurate; including after-hours EHR use would increase the number of reported duty hour violations. There was no association between after-hours EHR use and resident burnout.


2019 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Baidy S. Y. Kane ◽  
Mamour Gueye ◽  
Mohamed Dieng ◽  
Atoumane Faye ◽  
Awa Cheikh Ndao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document