scholarly journals Lordosis Restoration With Midline Minimally Invasive Cortical Trajectory Screws (MidLF) and Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Safe Technique With a Short Stay

10.14444/8065 ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 8065
Author(s):  
Brett Rocos ◽  
Ian Harding
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Short Stay ◽  
Safe Technique ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

scholarly journals Paraspinal muscle changes of unilateral multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Sung Yoo ◽  
Sang-Hyuk Min ◽  
Sung-Hyun Yoon ◽  
Chang-Hwan Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Paraspinal Muscle ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion ◽  
Muscle Changes

scholarly journals Integrating robotics into a minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion workflow

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (videosuppl1) ◽  
pp. V4
Author(s):  
Laura A. Snyder
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Robotic Device ◽  
Robotic Technology ◽  
Planning Software ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion ◽  
Improve Patient

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) is a well-accepted procedure with good outcomes. Robotics has the potential to augment these outcomes. This video demonstrates and discusses how surgeons can implement the use of a robotic device in an MIS TLIF workflow. The planning software and robotic arm guidance allow the surgeon to use intraoperative CT to guide the placement of pedicle screws in an MIS TLIF with optimal trajectory and decreased radiation. As robotic technology continues to improve, developing safe workflows that integrate robotics with currently well-established techniques should improve patient outcomes.The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/rJWOa6XVLW0.

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 236-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won-chul Lee ◽  
Jeong-Yoon Park ◽  
Kyung Hyun Kim ◽  
Sung Uk Kuh ◽  
Dong Kyu Chin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

scholarly journals Minimally-Invasive midline posterior interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws compares favorably to traditional open transforaminal interbody fusion

Heliyon ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. e02423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles H. Crawford ◽  
Roger K. Owens ◽  
Mladen Djurasovic ◽  
Jeffrey L. Gum ◽  
John R. Dimar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cortical Bone ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Cortical Bone Trajectory ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

P50. Disc Space Preparation in Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Technique

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 108S
Author(s):  
Peter Grossi ◽  
Louis Radden ◽  
Pradhan Ashtoush ◽  
Isaacs Robert
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Minimally Invasive Technique ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

scholarly journals Systematic review and meta-analysis of the therapeutic effects of minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion on spondylolisthesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Zaifei Chen ◽  
Wenxu Wu ◽  
Huazhang Xiong ◽  
Guodong Li ◽  
Wenbo Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Foramen Decompression in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

2014 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 891-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiann-Her Lin ◽  
Yung-Hsiao Chiang
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Unilateral Approach ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

scholarly journals Comparing Miniopen and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Degeneration

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Lun Lo ◽  
Chien-Min Lin ◽  
Yi-Shian Yeh ◽  
Yu-kai Su ◽  
Yuan-Yun Tseng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Diseases ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Transforaminal Interbody Fusion ◽  
Radicular Symptoms ◽  
Lumbar Spinal

Degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine, which are common among elderly people, cause back pain and radicular symptoms and lead to a poor quality of life. Lumbar spinal fusion is a standardized and widely accepted surgical procedure used for treating degenerative lumbar diseases; however, the classical posterior approach used in this procedure is recognized to cause vascular and neurologic damage of the lumbar muscles. Various studies have suggested that using the minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) technique provides long-term clinical outcomes comparable to those of open TLIF approaches in selected patients. In this study, we compared the perioperative and short-term advantages of miniopen, MI, and open TLIF. Compared with open TLIF, MI-TLIF and miniopen TLIF were associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and longer operative times; however, following the use of these procedures, no difference in quality of life was measured at 6 months or 1 year. Whether miniopen TLIF or MI-TLIF can replace traditional TLIF as the surgery of choice for treating degenerative lumbar deformity remains unclear, and additional studies are required for validating the safety and efficiency of these procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document