EVALUATION OF THE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS FOR SEISMIC DESIGN OF MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Aboelhamd ◽  
Aman Mwafy ◽  
Suliman Gargoum
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Seismic Design ◽  
Building Codes ◽  
Fundamental Period ◽  
Braced Frames ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Structural Dynamic ◽  
Moment Resisting Frames ◽  
Moment Resisting ◽  
Period Data

The fundamental period of vibration is a critical structural dynamic characteristic in seismic design. Several expressions for the calculation of the fundamental period have been recommended by different building codes and previous studies. However, further studies are still needed to evaluate the design expressions used for the calculation of the fundamental periods and assess the need for further refinement. In this study, comprehensive fundamental period data from two sources is collected and compared with different formulas from building codes and previous studies. The first data set is obtained from 147 instrumented buildings with various lateral force resisting systems (LFRSs). The second set of period data are collected from the dynamic response simulations of selected structures. Different LFRSs are considered, including steel moment resisting frames (SMRFs), reinforced concrete moment resisting frames (RCMRFs), reinforced concrete shear walls (RCSWs), concentrically braced frames (CBFs), eccentrically braced frames (EBFs), masonry structures and pre-cast structures. The correlations between the derived period expressions with those recommended by the design provisions show that the code approach is conservative enough for SMRFs, CBFs, masonry buildings and pre-cast structures. For RCMRFs, EBFs and RCSWs, the design code is slightly unconservative for low-rise buildings. The outcomes of the study help to arrive at more efficient and cost-effective seismic design of buildings with different characteristics.

Accounting for overstrength in seismic design of steel structures

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
M A Rahgozar ◽  
J L Humar
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Design ◽  
Slenderness Ratio ◽  
Steel Structures ◽  
Building Structures ◽  
Braced Frames ◽  
Concentrically Braced Frames ◽  
Moment Resisting Frames ◽  
Moment Resisting ◽  
Design Loads ◽  
Reserve Strength

Observations during many earthquakes have shown that building structures are able to sustain without damage earthquake forces considerably larger than those they were designed for. This is explained by the presence in such structures of significant reserve strength not accounted for in design. Relying on such overstrength, many seismic codes permit a reduction in design loads. The possible sources of reserve strength are outlined in this paper, and it is reasoned that a more rational basis for design would be to account for such sources in assessing the capacity rather than in reducing the design loads. As an exception, one possible source of reserve strength, the redistribution of internal forces, may be used in scaling down the design forces. This is because such scaling allows the determination of design forces through an elastic analysis rather than through a limit analysis. To assess the extent of reserve strength attributable to redistribution, steel building structures having moment-resisting frames or concentrically braced frames and from 2 to 30 storeys in height are analyzed for their response to lateral loading. A static nonlinear push-over analysis is used in which the gravity loads are held constant while the earthquake forces are gradually increased until a mechanism forms or the specified limit on interstorey drift is exceeded. It is noted that in moment-resisting frames the reserve strength reduces with an increase in the number of storeys as well as in the level of design earthquake forces. The P→Δ effect causes a further reduction. In structures having braced frames the main parameter controlling the reserve strength is the slenderness ratio of the bracing members. In these structures, reserve strength is almost independent of both the height of the structure and the effect of building sway. Key words: seismic design, overstrength factor, reserve strength owing to redistribution, steel moment-resisting frames, steel-braced frames, push-over analysis.

scholarly journals Experimental Study on Seismic Retrofitting of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Welded Concrete-Filled Steel Tubes

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (20) ◽  
pp. 7061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyong Min Ro ◽  
Min Sook Kim ◽  
Young Hak Lee
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Seismic Energy ◽  
Maximum Load ◽  
Steel Tube ◽  
Seismic Retrofitting ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Frame ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Moment Resisting Frames ◽  
Moment Resisting

Buildings constructed with non-seismic details are at risk of damage and collapse when an earthquake occurs due to a lack of strength, stiffness, and ductility. For reinforced concrete (RC) moment-resisting frames, seismic retrofitting methods that can enhance strength or ductility should be applied. However, such strategies have many disadvantages related to constructability, serviceability, securing integrity, and cost. In this paper, a welded concrete-filled steel tube (WCFST) system was examined in order to resolve the problems of the existing seismic retrofitting methods for RC moment-resisting frames. To evaluate the seismic performance of the proposed system, two specimens, one with non-seismic details and another reinforced with a WCFST seismic system, were manufactured for the cyclic loading tests. As a result of the experiments, the specimen retrofitted with the WCFST system showed maximum load, effective stiffness, and energy dissipation capacity values approximately 3, 2, and 2.5 times greater, respectively, than those obtained from the existing reinforced concrete frame specimen. The experimental results indicate that the proposed WCFST system is expected to be effective at improving the seismic performance by enhancing both the strength of the existing reinforced concrete frame structures and the dissipation of the seismic energy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document