scholarly journals Adverse Events Resulting from Care Provided on Adult Intensive Care Unit

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Villarreal ◽  
◽  
Wendy Lozano ◽  
Susana Mendoza ◽  
Nelly Montenegro ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Chaboyer ◽  
Lukman Thalib ◽  
Michelle Foster ◽  
Carol Ball ◽  
Brent Richards

Background Patients discharged from the intensive care unit may be at risk of adverse events because of complex care needs. Objective To identify the types, frequency, and predictors of adverse events that occur in the 72 hours after discharge from an intensive care unit when no evidence of adverse events was apparent before discharge. Methods A predictive cohort study of 300 patients from an adult intensive care unit was undertaken. An internationally accepted protocol for chart audit was used. Frequency of adverse events was calculated, and logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of adverse events. Results A total of 147 adverse events, 17 (11.6%) of which were defined as major, were incurred by 92 patients (30.7%). The 3 most common adverse events, hospital-incurred infection or sepsis (n = 32, 21.8%), hospital-incurred accident or injury (n = 17, 11.6%), and other complication such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary edema, or myocardial infarction (n = 17, 11.6%) accounted for 44.9% (n = 66) of all adverse events. Two predictors, respiratory rate less than 10/min or greater than or equal to 25/min and pulse rate exceeding 110/min, were significant independent predictors; requiring a high level of nursing care at the time of discharge was a significant predictor in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Taking, recording, and reporting vital signs are important. Nursing care requirements of patients at discharge from the intensive care unit may be worthy of further investigation in studies of patients after discharge.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-157
Author(s):  
Nicholas Wilson ◽  
◽  
Rinaldo Bellomo ◽  
Tyler Hay ◽  
Timothy Fazio ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency, indications and complications associated with the use of faecal diversion systems (rectal tubes) in critically ill patients. DESIGN: A single centre observational study over 15 months. SETTING: Intensive care unit (ICU). PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted during this period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of rectal tubes utilisation in ICU, as well as associated adverse events, with major events defined as lower gastrointestinal bleeding associated with defined blood transfusion of two or more units of red cells or endoscopy or surgical intervention. RESULTS: Of 3418 admission episodes, there were 111 episodes of rectal tubes inserted in 99 patients. Rectal tubes remained indwelling for a median of 5 days (range, 1–23) for a total of 641 patient-days. The most frequent indication for insertion was excessive bowel motions. A major adverse event was observed in three patients (3%; 0.5 events per 100 device days). Two patients underwent laparotomy and one patient sigmoidoscopy. These patients received between two and 23 units of packed red blood cells. Patients who had a rectal tube inserted had a substantially greater duration of ICU admission (mean, 14 days [SD, 14] v 2.8 days [SD, 3.7]) and hospital mortality (15% v 7.7%; risk ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2–3.4) as well as an overall higher Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death (ANZROD) score (mean, 27 [SD, 22] v 12.6 [SD, 20]). CONCLUSION: Rectal tubes appear to be frequently inserted and can lead to major adverse events in critically ill patients.


2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Halwani ◽  
M. Solaymani-Dodaran ◽  
H. Grundmann ◽  
C. Coupland ◽  
R. Slack

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 503-520
Author(s):  
Sonia O. Labeau ◽  
◽  
Elsa Afonso ◽  
Julie Benbenishty ◽  
Bronagh Blackwood ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document