scholarly journals Analisis Manifestasi Segragasi Politik Pelabelan dan Polarisasi di antara Kelompok Islam Sepanjang 2014-2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-87
Author(s):  
Romel Masykuri ◽  
Mohammad Fajar Shodiq Ramadlan
Keyword(s):  

Politik pelabelan merefleksikan dan mengekspresikan polarisasi dan kontestasi di antara kelompok Islam dalam politik. Label politik menjadi instrumen dan strategi untuk membangun citra dan persepsi dalam kontestasi dan konstelasi politik di Indonesia. Artikel ini menjelaskan bagaimana kontestasi di antara kelompok Islam termanifestasi melalui label untuk merebut klaim dan legitimasi politik. Metode process-tracing dan analisis konten digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menjelaskan label di antara kelompok Islam. Selama 2014-2019, ada dua isu penting terkait politik pelabelan. Pertama, label berhubungan dengan konteks, hubungan kausalitas, dan tujuan atau konsekuensi dari pelabelan. Label merefleksikan pembingkaian tertentu dan pembeda antara kelompok. Kedua, segregasi dan polarisasi politik di antara kelompok-kelompok Islam selama 2014-2019 di Indonesia termanifestasi melalui konstruksi dan produksi berbagai label. Melalui label, sentimen agama dan perbedaan antar kelompok Islam menjadi instrumen untuk mobilisasi atau menggerus dukungan politik lawan dalam politik elektoral.

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph G. Johnson ◽  
Greg Reese

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph G. Johnson ◽  
Greg Reese

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 606-614
Author(s):  
Wen YU ◽  
Gonggu YAN ◽  
Zhihua HUANG

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Bennett ◽  
Tasha Fairfield ◽  
Hillel David Soifer

Author(s):  
Lisel Hintz

This chapter provides clear definitions of the concepts the book uses and the theory of inside-out identity contestation it develops. The chapter defines competing identity proposals as suggested understandings of the national self that prescribe and proscribe specific behaviors and red lines as particularly intolerable points of contention among supporters of various proposals. It then argues that identity hegemony is the goal of these supporters, and contestation is the process by which the contours of identity debates change over time in supporters’ efforts to achieve hegemony. The chapter briefly reviews relevant literature to carve out space for the book’s theoretical argument: when supporters of a proposal are blocked at the domestic level, they take their fight “outside” through the use of international institutional conditionality, transnational activist networks, and/or diasporic politics. The chapter also discusses the methodology of intertextual analysis and process tracing employed in the study.


Author(s):  
Ekrem Karakoç

Employing most similar design and process-tracing methodology, this chapter focuses on Poland and the Czech Republic in the postcommunist region. It discusses the divergent paths these two countries have taken since their transitions. After discussing the similarities and dissimilarities of these two cases, it turns to the welfare policies shared by both countries with some differences under their former communist rule. It also traces voter turnout and linkage between political party and citizens, and explores how these two factors have affected social policies in each country. The last section offers a comparison of Polish and Czech social policies regarding the level and nature of their targeted spending and its effect on income inequality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document