Do ethical funds charge unethical fees?

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 291
Author(s):  
Praveen K. Das ◽  
S.P. Uma Rao
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Funds

scholarly journals Ethical funds for physicians

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-375
Author(s):  
D. J. Beaudin
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Funds

Private ethical fund investors across countries and time: a survey-based review

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anett Wins ◽  
Bernhard Zwergel
Keyword(s):  
Keyword Search ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Socially Responsible ◽  
Screening Criteria ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Responsible Investment ◽  
Private Investors ◽  
Ethical Funds ◽  
Fund Portfolio

Purpose – This paper aims to provide an overview of the literature to point out similarities and differences among private ethical investors across countries and time. Over the past three decades, many surveys have been conducted to advance the understanding of the demographic characteristics, motivation and morals of private ethical investors across countries and time. To date, the survey-based evidence on private investors into ethical funds is geographically rather segmented, and the research questions are fairly diverse. This permits only very temporally or regionally selective conclusions. Thereby, the authors identify interesting topics for future research. Design/methodology/approach – To identify the relevant literature for our review, the authors carried out a structured Boolean keyword search using major library services and databases. Findings – When questions about negative screening criteria are presented in a direct investment context, the consensus of private ethical investors “worldwide” (on average) is that social screening issues are most important, followed by ecological and moral topics. The percentage of ethical funds in the fund portfolio of the average private ethical investor in Europe seems to increase when the investor exhibits high degrees of pro-social attitudes and perceived consumer effectiveness. European private ethical investors are of the opinion that ethical funds perform worse but are less risky than conventional funds. Practical implications – The authors make suggestions on how investment companies should design their funds so that they can attract more socially responsible investors. Originality/value – The paper is of particular value because it focuses on private investors in the fast growing retail market of socially responsible investment funds.

Evaluating the Performance of Ethical and Non-ethical Funds: A Matched Pair Analysis

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1465-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Kreander ◽  
R.H. Gray ◽  
D.M. Power ◽  
C.D. Sinclair
Keyword(s):  
Matched Pair ◽  
Matched Pair Analysis ◽  
Ethical Funds ◽  
Pair Analysis

Sustainability-themed mutual funds: an empirical examination of risk and performance

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Ielasi ◽  
Monica Rossolini ◽  
Sara Limberti
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Funds ◽  
Mutual Fund ◽  
Investment Strategies ◽  
Socially Responsible ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Responsible Investment ◽  
Fund Managers ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Sustainable And Responsible Investment ◽  
Ethical Funds

PurposeThis paper aims to analyze the portfolio characteristics and the performance measures of sustainability-themed mutual funds, compared to ethical mutual funds that implement different sustainable and responsible investment strategies.Design/methodology/approachThe study refers to a European sample of 106 ethical funds and 51 sustainability-themed funds. The monthly performance of each fund is downloaded from Bloomberg for the period from January 1996 to December 2015. By applying a Fama and French (1993) three-factor model, the authors overcome the limits of a capital asset pricing model (CAPM) based-single index model, to compare the performance of the two categories of funds.FindingsSustainability-themed funds do not differ significantly from ethical funds in terms of portfolio attributes, except for market capitalization, age and net asset value. Regarding performance measures, the results shows that sustainability-themed funds have a lower underperformance than ethical funds (as measured by Jensen’s alpha), whereas the samples do not differ in terms of market risk (as measured by Beta coefficient). The idiosyncratic risk of sustainability-themed funds is positively influenced by the specific portfolio strategies. The sustainability-themed funds show a higher concentration in the industrial sector and a lower exposure to financial sector than ethical funds; in terms of geographical strategy, they are more global and international oriented; they mainly focus on small caps and value stocks.Research limitations/implicationsThe different sustainable and responsible investment strategies can be applied simultaneously and in a growing number of possible combinations. Mutual fund managers can consider thematic approach as an efficient opportunity for reconciling financial performance and economic sustainability. It is demonstrated that sustainability-themed funds adopt a portfolio strategy significantly different from ethical funds and from the environmental, social and governance benchmarks. Mutual fund managers implement a thematic specialization without any negative impact on the funds returns compared to ethical funds; actually, with a proper diversified portfolio, they are able to reduce idiosyncratic risk.Originality/valueThe analysis is extremely innovative, especially for the thematic sample. During the past 15 years, literature about sustainable and responsible investment has been focused especially on the differences in terms of risk and performance between socially responsible and conventional funds. This paper, starting from the methodology applied in these studies, wants to compare two different types of socially responsible strategies, with a specific focus on sustainability-themed mutual funds, given their exponential growth in the past few years.

Ethical Finance: Trends and Emerging Issues for Research

Think India ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-18
Author(s):  
Hemlata Chelawat ◽  
I. V. Trivedi
Keyword(s):  
Investment Decision ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Socially Responsible ◽  
Responsible Investment ◽  
Responsible Investing ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
Ethical Finance ◽  
Emerging Issues ◽  
Ethical Funds

The objective of this paper is to understand the manner in which research in ethical finance has evolved and development of literature in the field of ethical/ socially responsible investing has taken place, which would provide us directions for future research work in the area. Contributions of 108 research studies published in the area of ethical finance, over a time span of 15 years were analyzed using a framework that classified research in the area of ethical finance according to research agenda and data analysis framework. This points to the areas which lack in – depth research and are worthy of being explored in future research. The literature review reveals that research in ethical finance or socially responsible investment has been concentrated in a few areas. While some important areas like financial performance of ethical funds and indices have received adequate attention by researchers, there are several other areas which need focused research. Measurement of ESG performance, ESG criteria for selection of stocks for an ESG/ ethical investment portfolio, process of integration of ESG criteria into investment decision making and regulatory mechanisms that need to be evolved to promote adoption of ethical finance are some of the areas worthy of being explored in future research. The study also suggests that models using multi–decision criteria for portfolio selection could greatly improve the performance of an ethical portfolio.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document