1. Clinical Guidelines and Clinical Judgment

2019 ◽  
pp. 8-26
Author(s):  
Regina Pfister

In 1965, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of ipecac for over-the-counter sale. For years, ipecac remained on the list of “must have” items for households with small children. Typically, Ipecac was used to administer an emetic quickly before reaching the emergency room or to prevent the patient from having to be referred to a medical facility. In 2004, new ipecac guidelines were published stating that the routine stocking and use of ipecac would no longer be recommended. The new guidelines would change what had been accepted for decades. Though Ipecac is no longer suggested for home use, the possibility may still exist that for particular populations, it may still be necessary. The decision is left to the individuals’ healthcare provider or poison control center, as the recommendation states that the experts would be able to the make the best decision in determining a need to administer ipecac. The recommendation reinforces the need for healthcare providers to use current clinical guidelines and their own clinical judgment in providing advice to patients. The access to care problems we face will make it imperative that all healthcare providers keep up-to-date on public health issues. In this way, we can help our patients to become better health advocates


1977 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-324
Author(s):  
Anita F. Johnson ◽  
Ralph L. Shelton ◽  
William B. Arndt ◽  
Montie L. Furr

This study was concerned with the correspondence between the classification of measures by clinical judgment and by factor analysis. Forty-six measures were selected to assess language, auditory processing, reading-spelling, maxillofacial structure, articulation, and other processes. These were applied to 98 misarticulating eight- and nine-year-old children. Factors derived from the analysis corresponded well with categories the measures were selected to represent.


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Consuelo Gonzalez-Suarez ◽  
Karen Grimmer-Somers ◽  
Janine Dizon ◽  
Ellena King ◽  
Sylvan Lorenzo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document