Chapter Four. Private Regulators in Global Financial Markets Institutional Structure and Complementarity in Accounting Regulation

2011 ◽  
pp. 60-98
2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 469-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bikki Jaggi ◽  
James P. Winder ◽  
Cheng-Few Lee

This paper evaluates the role of fair value accounting in recent financial crisis, and examines whether the call for its demise is justified. Critics argue that fair accounting regulation added to the volatility in financial markets and aggravated financial crisis. On the other hand, supporters of this regulation argue that fair value accounting has been the victim of the recent financial crisis. They believe that this regulation is important for providing transparent, reliable, and accurate information on asset values to investors. After evaluating the impact of fair value accounting regulation on financial crisis, we examine negative and positive aspects of this regulation. Our discussion shows that fair value accounting provides useful information during stable market conditions, but its usefulness may become questionable during unstable and volatile financial markets. Overall, this regulation has the support of financial professional bodies. Some professionals are, however, concerned about recent modification to the fair value accounting rule, i.e., FAS 157-4, because this modification may not enhance reliability and accuracy of financial information. Despite recent modification, discussion on fair value accounting is far from over. Critics of the regulation still believe that this regulation should be eliminated, but the positive aspects of this regulation support its continuation.


Author(s):  
Tim Büthe ◽  
Walter Mattli

This chapter examines the role of private regulators in global financial markets, with particular emphasis on institutional structure and complementarity in accounting regulation. It first provides an overview of how the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) became the focal institution for setting financial reporting standards at the international level before discussing the institutional structures of IASB and corresponding institutions at the domestic level in the United States and in three European countries: Germany, France, and the United Kingdom (as well as pertinent European Union-level regional institutions). It compares accounting standard-setting in the United States and in these three countries and shows that the resulting differences in institutional complementarity put U.S. firms in an advantageous position over their European counterparts when standard-setting shifts to the international level.


Author(s):  
Jakob de Haan ◽  
Sander Oosterloo ◽  
Dirk Schoenmaker

Author(s):  
Marek Capinski ◽  
Ekkehard Kopp

Author(s):  
Jakob de Haan ◽  
Sander Oosterloo ◽  
Dirk Schoenmaker

1998 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 1353-1356
Author(s):  
Rosario N. Mantegna, H. Eugene Stanley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document