Appendix XIV Rate of flow units

2021 ◽  
pp. 259-260
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Hamilton ◽  
◽  
Peter J. Mouginis-Mark ◽  
Michael M. Sori ◽  
Stephen Scheidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 202 ◽  
pp. 114033
Author(s):  
J.H. Yu ◽  
L.Q. Shen ◽  
D. Şopu ◽  
B.A. Sun ◽  
W.H. Wang

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Kosiba ◽  
S. Scudino ◽  
J. Bednarcik ◽  
J. Bian ◽  
G. Liu ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 487-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. McPhie

SummaryRegionally mappable, silicic, outflow ignimbrite sheets are interbedded with fluvial volcanogenic conglomerates and sandstones of the Late Carboniferous Currabubula Formation of north-eastern N.S.W. Four of the most widespread of these ignimbrites are described and defined as members. The oldest member is comprised of many thin, originally non-welded flow units. Interbedded accretionary lapilli horizons may indicate phreatomagmatic activity at vent during the eruption in addition to local rain-flushing of co-ignimbrite ash clouds. Of the three other members, two are multiple flow-unit sheets, 160–180 m in aggregate thickness. Substantial portions of these sheets were originally welded. The remaining member is a simple welded ignimbrite characterized by abundant spherulites and lithophysae. Irregular pre-eruption topography and contemporaneous erosion were responsible for thickness variations of the ignimbrite sheets. Some palaeovalleys, now delineated by the ignimbrites, persisted in spite of repeated pyroclastic influxes. Relic pumice, shards and crystal fragments are ubiquitous components of the sedimentary facies of the Currabubula Formation, and were probably derived from originally poorly consolidated pyroclastic deposits such as airfall ash layers and non-welded ignimbrites. No surface trace of the sources of these ignimbrites exists. However, internal facies, thickness variations and volumes of the ignimbrites indicate that they periodically emanated from a multiple-caldera terrain which was continuously active during the Late Carboniferous, and located several kilometres to the west of present exposures.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umid Kakemem ◽  
Mohammadfarid Ghasemi ◽  
Arman Jafarian ◽  
Ayoub Mahmoudi ◽  
Kresten Anderskouv

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libing Fu ◽  
Jun Ni ◽  
Yuming Liu ◽  
Xuanran Li ◽  
Anzhu Xu

Abstract The Zhetybay Field is located in the South Mangyshlak Sub-basin, a delta front sedimentary reservoir onshore western Kazakhstan. It was discovered in 1961 and first produced by waterflooding in 1967. After more than 50 years of waterflooding development, the reservoirs are generally in the mid-to-high waterflooded stage and oil-water distribution becomes complicated and chaotic. It is very difficult to handle and identify so much logging data by hand since the oilfield has the characteristics of high-density well pattern and contains rich logging information with more than 2000 wells. The wave clustering method is used to divide the sedimentary rhythm of the logging curve. Sedimentary microfacies manifested as a regression sequence, with four types of composite sand bodies including the composite estuary bar and distributary channel combination, the estuary bar connected to the dam edge and the distributing channel combination, the isolated estuary bar and distributing channel combination, and the isolated beach sand. In order to distinguish the flow units, the artificial intelligence algorithm-support vector machine (SVM) method is established by learning the non-linear relationship between flow unit categories and parameters based on developing flow index and reservoir quality factor, summarizing permeability logarithm and porosity degree parameters in the sedimentary facies, and analyzing the production dynamic. The flow units in Zhetybay oilfield were classified into 4 types: A, B1, B2 and B3, and the latter three are the main types. Type A is distributed in the river, type B1 is distributed in the main body of the dam, type B2 is mainly distributed in the main body of the dam, and some of B2 is distributed in the dam edge, and B3 is located in the dam edge, sheet sand and beach sand. The results show that the accuracy of flow unit division by support vector machines reaches 91.1%, which clarifies the distribution law of flow units for oilfield development. This study is one of the significant keys for locating new wells and optimizing the workovers to increase recoverable reserves. It provides an effective guidance for efficient waterflooding in this oilfield.


10.1144/sp509 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 509 (1) ◽  
pp. NP-NP
Author(s):  
J. Hendry ◽  
P. Burgess ◽  
D. Hunt ◽  
X. Janson ◽  
V. Zampetti

Modern seismic data have become an essential toolkit for studying carbonate platforms and reservoirs in impressive detail. Whilst driven primarily by oil and gas exploration and development, data sharing and collaboration are delivering fundamental geological knowledge on carbonate systems, revealing platform geomorphologies and how their evolution on millennial time scales, as well as kilometric length scales, was forced by long-term eustatic, oceanographic or tectonic factors. Quantitative interrogation of modern seismic attributes in carbonate reservoirs permits flow units and barriers arising from depositional and diagenetic processes to be imaged and extrapolated between wells.This volume reviews the variety of carbonate platform and reservoir characteristics that can be interpreted from modern seismic data, illustrating the benefits of creative interaction between geophysical and carbonate geological experts at all stages of a seismic campaign. Papers cover carbonate exploration, including the uniquely challenging South Atlantic pre-salt reservoirs, seismic modelling of carbonates, and seismic indicators of fluid flow and diagenesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document