The prognostic value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Xiaocong Zeng ◽  
Lang Li ◽  
Qiang Su

AbstractPrecise risk stratification is important in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) on determination for hospitalization and intensity of treatment. A meta-analysis was performed in studies of patients with NSTE-ACS to evaluate the predictive nature of elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).Online searches were conducted using database to identify suitable studies. A summary of relative risks (RRs) for death and myocardial infarction (MI) was calculated using random-effects modeling. We also calculated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.Thirteen studies were included. Elevated NT-proBNP levels were significantly associated with mortality [RR 4.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.85–6.22] and incidence of MI (RR 1.66; 95% CI 1.24–2.22). The sensitivity and specificity for MI was 69.1% (95% CI 66.6%–71.6%) and 43.6% (95% CI 42.9%–44.3%), respectively, along with the positive and negative predictive values for MI of 8.2% (95% CI 7.7%–8.7%) and 95.1% (95% CI 94.6%–95.5%), respectively.Meta-analysis suggests that elevated NT-proBNP levels were associated with an increased risk for MI or death in patients with NSTE-ACS. Normal levels of NT-proBNP are certainly more helpful when selecting NSTE-ACS patients with likelihood for favorable outcomes.

Heart ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2017-311233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonali R Gnanenthiran ◽  
Leonard Kritharides ◽  
Mario D’Souza ◽  
Harry C Lowe ◽  
David B Brieger

Circulation ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Galvani ◽  
Filippo Ottani ◽  
Luigi Oltrona ◽  
Diego Ardissino ◽  
Gian Franco Gensini ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos I Nikolaou ◽  
Michalis J Koutouzis ◽  
Apostolos Christou ◽  
Georgios M Fournarakis ◽  
Sotirios P Patsilinakos ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattia Galli ◽  
Felicita Andreotti ◽  
Domenico D’Amario ◽  
Rocco Vergallo ◽  
Giovanni Maria Vescovo ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Despite the increasing use of early invasive strategies in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), optimal initial antithrombotic therapy (ATT) based on the safety/efficacy profile of all guideline-recommended combinations remains crucial for the early management of both medically and invasively treated NSTE-ACS patients. Methods and results Randomized controlled trials on ATT in NSTE-ACS/unstable angina reporting early (within 14 days) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding were selected. Overall, 3799 studies were screened, 117 clinical trials were assessed as potentially eligible, 20 trials were included in the study. According to treatment and type of intervention, nine different meta-analyses were performed including a total of 88 748 patients. A significant reduction of trial-defined MACE was found for aspirin vs. placebo [odds ratio (OR), 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34–0.96], heparin vs. placebo (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15–0.97), aspirin + heparin vs. placebo (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18–0.59), aspirin + heparin vs. aspirin (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42–0.79), aspirin + low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) vs. aspirin + unfractionated heparin (UFH; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69–0.95) and aspirin + ticagrelor/prasugrel + heparins vs. aspirin + clopidogrel + heparins (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62–0.94). A significant decrease in major bleeding was found only for fondaparinux vs. LMWH on the background of aspirin + clopidogrel (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.44–0.62) despite a clear trend towards increased bleeding for heparin compared to aspirin, aspirin + heparin compared to placebo, aspirin + heparin compared to aspirin, aspirin + P2Y12inhibitors + UFH/LMWH compared to aspirin + UFH/LMWH, and aspirin + ticagrelor/prasugrel + heparins compared to aspirin + clopidogrel + heparins. Conclusion To our knowledge, these findings are the first to report the safety and efficacy of all the various combinations of currently recommended ATT for the early management of NSTE-ACS, providing a comprehensive evidence-base to guide decisions depending on the patients’ bleeding risk and treatment strategy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document