scholarly journals Multicriterial CNN based beam generation for robotic radiosurgery of the prostate

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Gerlach ◽  
Christoph Fürweger ◽  
Theresa Hofmann ◽  
Alexander Schlaefer

AbstractAlthough robotic radiosurgery offers a flexible arrangement of treatment beams, generating treatment plans is computationally challenging and a time consuming process for the planner. Furthermore, different clinical goals have to be considered during planning and generally different sets of beams correspond to different clinical goals. Typically, candidate beams sampled from a randomized heuristic form the basis for treatment planning. We propose a new approach to generate candidate beams based on deep learning using radiological features as well as the desired constraints. We demonstrate that candidate beams generated for specific clinical goals can improve treatment plan quality. Furthermore, we compare two approaches to include information about constraints in the prediction. Our results show that CNN generated beams can improve treatment plan quality for different clinical goals, increasing coverage from 91.2 to 96.8% for 3,000 candidate beams on average. When including the clinical goal in the training, coverage is improved by 1.1% points.

Author(s):  
Alice Medalia ◽  
Tiffany Herlands ◽  
Alice Saperstein ◽  
Nadine Revheim

Chapter 6 describes how to use treatment plans to guide cognitive remediation sessions. Personalized treatment planning takes into account the multiple factors unique to each client that impact how they use cognition in everyday life. Neuropsychological Educational Approach to Remediation (NEAR) treatment plans address current cognitive deficits, the client’s need for structure, motivation and goals, learning style and barriers, endurance, frustration tolerance, approach to tasks, and task repertoire. The treatment plan should be updated periodically because each of these factors may change over time. Treatment plan components are reviewed, and case examples are provided.


Author(s):  
J.R. Kelly ◽  
H.S.M. Park ◽  
D.J. Carlson ◽  
M.S. Moran ◽  
L.D. Wilson ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Lindsey Appenzoller Olsen

[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] Knowledge-based planning (KBP) has become a prominent area of research in radiation oncology in the last five years. The development of KBP aims to address the lack of systematic quality control and plan quality variability in radiotherapy treatment planning by providing achievable, patient-specific optimization objectives derived from a model trained with a cohort of previously treated, site-specific plans. This dissertation intended to develop, evaluate, and implement a knowledge-based planning system to reduce variability and improve radiotherapy treatment plan quality. The project aimed to 1) develop and validate an algorithm to train mathematical models that predict dose-volume histograms for organs at risk in radiotherapy planning, 2) implement the algorithm into a software application in order to transfer the technology into clinical practice, and 3) evaluate the impact of the software system (algorithm + application) on reducing variability and improving radiotherapy treatment plan quality through knowledge transfer. The presented work demonstrates that a KBP model is beneficial to radiotherapy planning. The developed models adequately describe what is dosimetrically achievable for patient specific anatomy and have proven useful in outlier detection for quality control of radiotherapy planning. The KBP paradigm has also demonstrated ability to improve treatment plan quality through benchmarking and transfer of knowledge between institutions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 537-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marleen Balvert ◽  
Bram L Gorissen ◽  
Dick den Hertog ◽  
Aswin L Hoffmann

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (6Part18) ◽  
pp. 3428-3428
Author(s):  
T Yang ◽  
W Xu ◽  
R Ge ◽  
B Qu ◽  
S Xu

2018 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. S1037-S1038
Author(s):  
R.L. Christiansen ◽  
C.R. Hansen ◽  
R.H. Dahlrot ◽  
A.S. Bertelsen ◽  
O. Hansen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Hardcastle ◽  
Olivia Cook ◽  
Xenia Ray ◽  
Alisha Moore ◽  
Kevin L. Moore ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Quality assurance (QA) of treatment plans in clinical trials improves protocol compliance and patient outcomes. Retrospective use of knowledge-based-planning (KBP) in clinical trials has demonstrated improved treatment plan quality and consistency. We report the results of prospective use of KBP for real-time QA of treatment plan quality in the TROG 15.03 FASTRACK II trial, which evaluates efficacy of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for kidney cancer. Methods A KBP model was generated based on single institution data. For each patient in the KBP phase (open to the last 31 patients in the trial), the treating centre submitted treatment plans 7 days prior to treatment. A treatment plan was created by using the KBP model, which was compared with the submitted plan for each organ-at-risk (OAR) dose constraint. A report comparing each plan for each OAR constraint was provided to the submitting centre within 24 h of receiving the plan. The centre could then modify the plan based on the KBP report, or continue with the existing plan. Results Real-time feedback using KBP was provided in 24/31 cases. Consistent plan quality was in general achieved between KBP and the submitted plan. KBP review resulted in replan and improvement of OAR dosimetry in two patients. All centres indicated that the feedback was a useful QA check of their treatment plan. Conclusion KBP for real-time treatment plan review was feasible for 24/31 cases, and demonstrated ability to improve treatment plan quality in two cases. Challenges include integration of KBP feedback into clinical timelines, interpretation of KBP results with respect to clinical trade-offs, and determination of appropriate plan quality improvement criteria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document