scholarly journals Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Rheumatic Diseases

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-37
Author(s):  
Alexandra NG Hoi-Yan ◽  
Chi Chiu Mok
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Tumor Necrosis ◽  
Drug Efficacy ◽  
Drug Level ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Drug Levels ◽  
Underlying Diseases ◽  
Individual Pharmacokinetics ◽  
Necrosis Factor

Abstract The ultimate goal of treating rheumatic disease is to achieve rapid suppression of inflammation, while at the same time minimizing the toxicities from rheumatic drugs. Different patients have different individual pharmacokinetics that can affect the drug level. Moreover, different factors, such as renal function, age or even different underlying diseases, can affect the drug level. Therefore, giving the same dosage of drugs to different patients may result in different drug levels. This article will review the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring in maximizing drug efficacy, while reducing the risk of toxicities in Hydroxychloroquine, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Tacrolimus and Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors (TNF Inhibitors).

scholarly journals P582 Adalimumab therapeutic drug monitoring: Does time of testing matter?

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S488-S488
Author(s):  
S Shields ◽  
J P Seenan ◽  
A Dunlop ◽  
P Galloway ◽  
J Macdonald
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Drug Level ◽  
Drug Dose ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Drug Levels ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Serum Drug Level ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Fourth Quartile

Abstract Background Whilst anti-TNF drugs such as adalimumab (ADL) have revolutionised the management of inflammatory bowel disease treatment outcomes are not universally favourable with 30% primary non-response (PNR) and 46% secondary loss of response (SLOR) rates reported.1,2 Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)—the measurement of serum drug levels and anti-drug antibodies—has become popular with clinicians who use it to optimise biologic therapy through serum drug-level guided dose adjustment. Conventionally TDM is based on the interpretation of trough drug levels (DL) which are obtained by drawing a blood sample immediately prior to the next drug dose. Obtaining an ADL trough DL can be challenging as the drug is administered as a subcutaneous injection usually in the patient’s own home. The aim of this project was to determine the current use of non-trough ADL TDM in clinical practice and determine whether timing of ADL TDM in relation to the next planned dose is clinically important. Methods All ADL DLs performed in 2018 in the Scottish Biologic TDM service3 were identified. DLs were included for patients in sustained clinical remission (SCR), on 40mg every other week dosing, and if the time from the last dose was ≤14 days. TDM performed during induction and for PNR or SLOR were excluded, as were patients on nonstandard dosing or with missing data on dose and interval. Results were analysed by quartile according to time from the last drug dose. Results 338 DLs were included. Median DL is 8µg/ml (range <0.4–36). Median time from last dose is 12 (range 0–14) days. The first quartile (n = 83, median 5 (range 0–7) days) had a median DL of 8.2µg/ml (<0.4–28.1). The second quartile (n = 90, median 11 (8–12) days) had a median DL of 7.9µg/ml (<0.4–36). The third quartile (n = 80, 13 days from last dose) had a median DL of 8µg/ml (<0.4 – 28.1). fourth quartile samples (n = 85, 14 days from last dose – true trough DLs) had a median DL of 8 µg/ml (<0.4–34.8). No relationship was identified between observed DL and the time of DL testing (ρ= -0.3162, p = 0.23). Conclusion It is not necessary to use trough DLs when performing ADL TDM for individuals in SCR. These data should give clinicians the confidence to use opportunistic ADL TDM testing in a clinical setting. Further work should be undertaken on non-trough testing of ADL DLs in other clinical scenarios. Disclosure Biogen GmbH contributed funding for this research. Authors had full editorial control and approval of all content. References

Therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease in children

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-25
Author(s):  
A.S. Illarionov ◽  
◽  
T.V. Radygina ◽  
A.S. Potapov ◽  
A.P. Fisenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Tumor Necrosis ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Endoscopic Remission ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Factor Α ◽  
Necrosis Factor

Objective. To evaluate the significance of therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab (ADA) concentration levels and antibodies to it in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in children. Patients and methods. In this study, 103 children with IBD (24 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 79 with Crohn’s disease (CD)) aged 3–18 years were examined during maintenance therapy with ADA (100 mg/mL in 0.4 mL). Body weight, duration of disease and therapy, use of azathioprine (AZA), achievement of clinical and endoscopic remission, albumin levels, residual levels of ADA and antibodies to the drug, circulating cytokine levels in serum were assessed. Results. A significant decrease in ADA levels in children in the absence of clinical remission in CD (5.21 [3.32; 7.43] μg/mL in remission) and in UC (2.42 [0.42; 4.51] μg/mL, p = 0.001) was shown. A high-quality separation model for residual ADA levels for exacerbation/remission conditions for clinical and endoscopic activity for children with CD and UC was obtained through ROC-analysis. The minimum residual ADA levels for maintaining clinical remission in children with CD were 8.1 μg/mL and 10.5 μg/mL for mucosal healing. In children with UC, as well as in children weighing <40 kg, these levels were higher. The formation of antibodies to ADA was minimal; combination therapy with AZA showed no efficacy. Key cytokines correlating with ADA concentration were interleukins IL-6, -13, -31, -27, -9, and tumor necrosis factor-α. Conclusion. To improve the efficacy of ADA therapy in children with IBD, therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed, considering the nosology and body weight of the child, as well as the goal of therapy (clinical and endoscopic remission). Key words: inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, adalimumab, therapeutic drug monitoring, tumor necrosis factor-α, cytokine profile, azathioprine

scholarly journals Therapeutic drug monitoring in epilepsy clinic: a multi-disciplinary approach

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunee Lertsinudom ◽  
Aporanee Chaiyakum ◽  
Supinya Tuntapakul ◽  
Kittisak Sawanyawisuth ◽  
Siriporn Tiamkao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Drug Level ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Therapeutic Level ◽  
Drug Levels ◽  
Drug Level Monitoring ◽  
Level Monitoring

Epilepsy is a common public health problem and needs multi-disciplinary treatment. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is one of step of the multi-disciplinary treatment in epilepsy at Epilepsy clinic, Khon Kaen University (Thailand). The TDM service has been established since 2008. Here, we aimed to study the roles of TDM order and epilepsy control. This is a prospective descriptive study in which data collection was done from January 1 to December 31, 2010, the period when pharmacists took part in assessing the appropriateness in measurement and interpretation of TDM in order to provide suggestions for physicians. The 112 patients under study had an average age of 38.21±15.36 years; 254 samples were collected for therapeutic drug monitoring; phenytoin was submitted mostly for drug monitoring at 46.46%; 44.49% of sub-missions for drug level monitoring were made owing to a suspected sub-therapeutic level. Associations were found between reasons of sending samples for drug level monitoring and the measured drug levels, <em>i.e.</em>, 66.67% of drug levels found was so low that they were undetectable in sample for patients’ compliance investigation and 38.94% of the drug levels were found to be sub-therapeutic as for the case where submission of samples was done because of suspected sub-therapeutic level, 40% of the cases were found to be in toxicity range in the cases with suspected over-therapeutic levels and monitoring levels, 58.25% were found to be within the therapeutic range. Pharmacists used the interpreted results in patients’ care by recommending physicians to monitor therapeutic drug closely, to adjust the dosage of drugs, and to recommend checking patients’ compliance in their use of drugs at 56.5, 38.9, and 4.3%, respectively. Physicians’ responses were found to be absolute follow, partial follow and not follow at 77.95, 11.03, and 7.48%, respectively. In conclusion, associations were found between reasons of TDM order and measured drug level. Therapeutic drug monitoring services at the Epilepsy Clinic was useful in supporting clinical information queries. Pharmacists could make use of interpreted drug level information by recommending physicians to monitor drug levels and adjust individual dosage regimen accordingly. It should be noted that physicians accepted pharmacists’ recommendation, denoting multi-disciplinary care team that would lead to greater efficiency.

scholarly journals Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists in Crohn Disease: A Theoretical Construct to Apply Pharmacokinetics and Guidelines to Clinical Practice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Vande Casteele ◽  
Brian G Feagan ◽  
Douglas C Wolf ◽  
Anca Pop ◽  
Mohamed Yassine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Necrosis Factor ◽  
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring ◽  
Crohn Disease ◽  
Drug Monitoring ◽  
Tumor Necrosis ◽  
Certolizumab Pegol ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Antagonist Therapy ◽  
Tnf Antagonist ◽  
Necrosis Factor

Abstract Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the measurement of drug and antidrug antibody concentrations in individuals to guide treatment decisions. In patients with Crohn disease (CD), TDM, used either reactively or proactively, is emerging as a valuable tool for optimization of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy. Reactive TDM is carried out in response to treatment failure, whereas proactive TDM involves the periodic monitoring of patients responding to TNF antagonist therapy to allow treatment optimization. In patients with CD, most of the available data for TDM relate to the first-to-market TNF antagonist infliximab and, to a lesser extent, to adalimumab and certolizumab pegol. Several gastroenterology associations, including the American Gastroenterology Association, have endorsed the use of reactive TDM in patients with active CD. However, fewer recommendations currently exist for the use of proactive TDM, although several new prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating proactive TDM strategies have been published. In this review, the current evidence for reactive and proactive TDM is discussed, and a proactive treatment algorithm for certolizumab pegol based on previously published threshold concentrations is proposed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document