scholarly journals Hydrogen bonding versus packing effects in the crystal structure of 3-((1R,2S)-1-methylpyrrolidin-1-ium-2-yl)pyridin-1-ium tetraiodidozincate(II), C10H16I4ZnN2

2020 ◽  
Vol 235 (4) ◽  
pp. 959-962
Author(s):  
Guido J. Reiss ◽  
Alena Sergeeva

AbstractC10H16I4ZnN2, monoclinic, P21 (no. 4), a = 7.3340(1) Å, b = 14.4781(3) Å, c = 8.6768(2) Å, β = 94.919(2)°, V = 917.93(3) Å3, Z = 2, Rgt(F) = 0.0165, wRref(F2) = 0.0397, T = 110 K.

Author(s):  
Z. Cheng ◽  
Y. Cheng ◽  
L. Guo ◽  
D. Xu

AbstractThe crystal structure of the title compound D(H)LAP with chemical formula (D


Chemistry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-163
Author(s):  
Duncan Micallef ◽  
Liana Vella-Zarb ◽  
Ulrich Baisch

N,N′,N″,N‴-Tetraisopropylpyrophosphoramide 1 is a pyrophosphoramide with documented butyrylcholinesterase inhibition, a property shared with the more widely studied octamethylphosphoramide (Schradan). Unlike Schradan, 1 is a solid at room temperature making it one of a few known pyrophosphoramide solids. The crystal structure of 1 was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and compared with that of other previously described solid pyrophosphoramides. The pyrophosphoramide discussed in this study was synthesised by reacting iso-propyl amine with pyrophosphoryl tetrachloride under anhydrous conditions. A unique supramolecular motif was observed when compared with previously published pyrophosphoramide structures having two different intermolecular hydrogen bonding synthons. Furthermore, the potential of a wider variety of supramolecular structures in which similar pyrophosphoramides can crystallise was recognised. Proton (1H) and Phosphorus 31 (31P) Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, infrared (IR) spectroscopy, mass spectrometry (MS) were carried out to complete the analysis of the compound.


Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 2778
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Lane ◽  
Graham C. Saunders

The crystal structure of 4-(2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridyl)diphenylphosphine oxide (1) contains two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. Although the molecules are virtually identical in all other aspects, the P=O bond distances differ by ca. 0.02 Å. In contrast, although tris(pentafluorophenyl)phosphine oxide (2) has a similar crystal structure, the P=O bond distances of the two independent molecules are identical. To investigate the reason for the difference, a density functional theory study was undertaken. Both structures comprise chains of molecules. The attraction between molecules of 1, which comprises lone pair–π, weak hydrogen bonding and C–H∙∙∙arene interactions, has energies of 70 and 71 kJ mol−1. The attraction between molecules of 2 comprises two lone pair–π interactions, and has energies of 99 and 100 kJ mol−1. There is weak hydrogen bonding between molecules of adjacent chains involving the oxygen atom of 1. For one molecule, this interaction is with a symmetry independent molecule, whereas for the other, it also occurs with a symmetry related molecule. This provides a reason for the difference in P=O distance. This interaction is not possible for 2, and so there is no difference between the P=O distances of 2.


2006 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. o2765-o2767
Author(s):  
Hong-Li Wang ◽  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Yi Dai

The title compound, C10H9N3, is essently planar, except for the methyl H atoms. The asymmetric unit consists of two molecules. In the crystal structure, weak intramolecular C—H...N hydrogen-bonding interactions occur, linking the molecules into chains propagating along the a axis.


2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 368-372
Author(s):  
T. N. Drebushchak ◽  
E. V. Boldyreva ◽  
K. Fucke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document