Melissa M. Wilcox: Queer Religiosities. An Introduction to Queer and Transgender Studies in Religion. (Lanham u. a.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2021), 252 S., ISBN 978-1-4422-7566-9.

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-330
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Albrecht
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 425-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Schilt ◽  
Danya Lagos
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. S248-S251 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Hughes ◽  
Lynda Emel ◽  
Brett Hanscom ◽  
Sahar Zangeneh

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 318-320
Author(s):  
Brice Smith
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Nicole Seymour

This article identifies a particular subgenre of the road narrative, the transgender road narrative, analyzing the filmTransamericaand the novelNevadaas representative examples. The first part draws on transgender studies scholarship, showing how these texts both depict a long history of trans (im)mobility and engage with the affective geographies of gender transitioning, including the idea of the body as home. The second part draws on ecocriticism and environmental humanities scholarship, comparing howTransamericaandNevadadepict landscapes and environments in relation to trans bodies. This article thus takes this subgenre as an opportunity to explore the intersection of transgender issues and environmental issues and subsequently to develop a new line of inquiry that we might call “trans ecology.” (This article has been commissioned as a supplement toThe Oxford Handbook of Ecocriticism, edited by Greg Garrard.)


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-170
Author(s):  
Cyle Metzger ◽  
Kirstin Ringelberg

Transgender art and visual culture studies is a quickly growing field, and we present it to readers of this themed issue less as a linear discourse or a set of parameters than as a prism, with no clear temporal progression or geopolitical center. In this introduction, we not only announce the articles in this issue and discuss their convergences and divergences but also survey works in transgender studies that have proven critical to discussions of the visual and material within transgender cultures. Reading what follows, we hope any shared notion of transgender art and visual culture is expanded rather than contracted – that we find new ideas rather than merely those that reconfirm our existing sense of things or serve a monolithic construct that limits our future imaginary.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 285-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kunzel
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surya Monro

This paper provides a cross-cultural account of gender diversity which explores the territory that is opened up when sex, gender, and sexual orientation, binaries are disrupted or displaced. Whilst many people who identify as trans or intersex see themselves as male or female, others identify in ways which destabilize sex/gender and sexual orientation binaries. The paper provides a typology of ways in which sex/gender diversity can be conceptualized, and draws out the implications for theorizing gender. It discusses the contributions made by the new wave of authors working in the field of transgender studies; authors who draw on and inform the sociology of sex and gender, feminisms, and poststructuralist theory. It based on empirical material from research carried out in India and the UK.


Sexualities ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 80-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zowie Davy

Deconstructionism as a method in transgender studies has been useful to collapse concepts and ideas about (trans) gender and sexuality. In spite of the usefulness of undoing the gender and sexuality canon, by way of concentrating on transgender practices, the resulting deconstructions often leave us with no place to go. This article develops an analysis of transsexual and genderqueer people’s bodily aesthetic assemblages, challenging theorizations that exclusively pit transsexual people as subjugated and genderqueer people as subversive. Drawing on interview data from 23 transsexual and genderqueer people, this article argues that transsexual and genderqueer people, regardless of their desire for particular bodily aesthetic interventions and gender recognition, productively flee, elude, flow, leak and disappear from categorizing legal statutes and healthcare protocols. The article concludes by arguing that deconstructive work becomes divisive and unproductive for theorizing and understanding the bodily aesthetics and diverse connectivities and affectivities of transsexual and genderqueer people, all of whom become territorialized, deterritorialized and reterritorialized through polyvocal bodily aesthetic assemblages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document