Analysis and Mitigation of Reported Informatics Patient Safety Adverse Events at the Veterans Health Administration

Author(s):  
Lesley Taylor ◽  
Scott D. Wood ◽  
Roger J. Chapman
2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 335-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Weeks ◽  
Tina Foster ◽  
Amy E. Wallace ◽  
Erik Stalhandske

Tort claims have been studied for various reasons. Several studies have found that most tort claims are not related to negligent adverse events and most negligent adverse events do not result in tort claims. Several studies have examined the disposition of tort claims to understand the likelihood of payment once a claim has been made. Still others have proposed that tort-claims trend analysis may help administrators target their quality-improvement efforts and identify problems with quality that would not otherwise be captured.In this article, we conduct a tort-claims analysis to explore areas for quality improvement, specifically for patient safety, in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Patient safety is an increasingly highlighted aspect of health-care delivery. Failure to assure patient safety can result in bad clinical outcomes, additional costs of care, and a negative organizational image. Filing a tort claim is one way for an individual to express concern about an organization. For our analysis, we draw from resolved tort claims in the Veterans Health Administration from fiscal years 1989 to 2000.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. e579-e590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Aboumrad ◽  
Alexander Fuld ◽  
Christina Soncrant ◽  
Julia Neily ◽  
Douglas Paull ◽  
...  

Purpose: Oncology providers are leaders in patient safety. Despite their efforts, oncology-related medical errors still occur, sometimes resulting in patient injury or death. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Center of Patient Safety used data obtained from root cause analysis (RCA) to determine how and why these adverse events occurred in the VHA, and how to prevent future reoccurrence. This study details the types of oncology adverse events reported in VHA hospitals and their root causes and suggests actions for prevention and improvement. Methods: We searched the National Center for Patient Safety adverse event reporting database for RCA related to oncology care from October 1, 2013, to September 8, 2017, to identify event types, root causes, severity of outcomes, care processes, and suggested actions. Two independent reviewers coded these variables, and inter-rater agreement was calculated by κ statistic. Variables were evaluated using descriptive statistics. Results: We identified 48 RCA reports that specifically involved an oncology provider. Event types included care delays (39.5% [n = 19]), issues with chemotherapy (25% [n = 12]) and radiation (12.5% [n = 6]), other (12.5% [n = 6]), and suicide (10.5% [n = 5]). Of the 48 events, 27.1% (n = 13) resulted in death, 4.2% (n = 2) in severe harm, 18.8% (n = 9) in temporary harm, 20.8% (n = 10) in minimal harm, and 2.1% (n = 1) in no harm. The majority of root causes identified a need to improve care processes and policies, interdisciplinary communication, and care coordination. Conclusion: This analysis highlights an opportunity to implement system-wide changes to prevent similar events from reoccurring. These actions include comprehensive cancer clinics, usability testing of medical equipment, and standardization of processes and policies. Additional studies are necessary to assess oncologic adverse events across specialties.


2017 ◽  
Vol 214 (5) ◽  
pp. 786-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Chen ◽  
Brad S. Oriel ◽  
Amy K. Rosen ◽  
Mary A. Greenan ◽  
Houman Amirfarzan ◽  
...  

Medical Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy K. Rosen ◽  
Susan Loveland ◽  
Marlena Shin ◽  
Michael Shwartz ◽  
Amresh Hanchate ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document