Effect of Preseason Concurrent Muscular Strength and High-Intensity Interval Training in Professional Soccer Players

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 653-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pui-lam Wong ◽  
Anis Chaouachi ◽  
Karim Chamari ◽  
Alexandre Dellal ◽  
Ulrik Wisloff
2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 249-257
Author(s):  
Alireza Rabbani ◽  
Filipe Manuel Clemente ◽  
Mehdi Kargarfard ◽  
Saeid Jahangiri

Abstract The aim of the present study was to compare combined small‐sided game (SSG) and high‐intensity interval training (HIT) with different order. Twenty‐one semi‐professional soccer players were divided into two groups: SSG+HIT (n = 10) and HIT+SSG (n = 11), and underwent similar four‐week training programs. Players completed the 30‐15 Intermittent Fitness Test (30‐15IFT) before and after the experiment; maximum speed (VIFT) was recorded. During the experiment, seven sessions of SSG (3 vs 3) and HIT (15ʺ‐15ʺ with 95‐100% VIFT) were implemented. Weekly accumulated training loads for both groups during the experiment were similar. Moderate improvements in VIFT were observed in both SSG+HIT (+6.2%, 90% confidence limits, [CL] 4.6; 7.7 and Effect Size, [ES] +0.96) and HIT+SSG (+6.9%, 90% CL 4.6; 9.3 and ES +0.97) groups. Between‐group difference in changes of VIFT was trivial (+0.7%, 90% CL ‐1.8; 3.3 and ES +0.11). Combining SSG and HIT in different order elicited the same enhancement in high‐intensity intermittent performance in soccer players.


Author(s):  
Filipe Manuel Clemente ◽  
Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo ◽  
José Afonso ◽  
Hugo Sarmento ◽  
Thomas Rosemann ◽  
...  

This systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of small-sided games (SSGs)-based interventions with the effects of running-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) interventions on soccer players’ repeated sprint ability (RSA). The data sources utilized were Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and PubMed. The study eligibility criteria were: (i) parallel studies (SSG-based programs vs. running-based HIIT) conducted in soccer players with no restrictions on age, sex, or competitive level; (ii) isolated intervention programs (i.e., only SSG vs. only running-based HIIT as individual forms) with no restrictions on duration; (iii) a pre–post outcome for RSA; (iv) original, full-text, peer-reviewed articles written in English. An electronic search yielded 513 articles, four of which were included in the present study. There was no significant difference between the effects of SSG-based and HIIT-based training interventions on RSA (effect size (ES) = 0.30; p = 0.181). The within-group analysis revealed no significant effect of SSG-based training interventions (ES = −0.23; p = 0.697) or HIIT-based training interventions (ES = 0.08; p = 0.899) on RSA. The meta-comparison revealed that neither SSGs nor HIIT-based interventions were effective in improving RSA in soccer players, and no differences were found between the two types of training. This suggests that complementary training may be performed to improve the effects of SSGs and HIIT. It also suggests that different forms of HIIT can be used because of the range of opportunities that such training affords.


2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (5S) ◽  
pp. 779
Author(s):  
Stelios Poulos ◽  
Ilias Zacharogiannis ◽  
Giorgos Paradisis ◽  
Fotini Dagli ◽  
Maria Maridaki

Sports ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Arazi ◽  
Abbas Keihaniyan ◽  
Amin EatemadyBoroujeni ◽  
Amir Oftade ◽  
Sheida Takhsha ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document