Screening for Bipolar Disorder and Finding Borderline Personality Disorder: A Replication and Extension

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 533-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Zimmerman ◽  
Iwona Chelminski ◽  
Kristy Dalrymple ◽  
Jacob Martin

The authors’ group previously reported that patients who screened positive on the Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ), the most frequently studied screening scale for bipolar disorder, were as likely to be diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) as with bipolar disorder. A limitation of that study was that the authors examined the performance of the MDQ in patients presenting for various psychiatric disorders, including depression. The recognition of bipolar disorder and its differential diagnosis with BPD is of greatest clinical relevance in depressed patients. In the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project, the authors attempted to replicate their initial findings in a new sample of psychiatric outpatients, and they also examined the performance of the MDQ in depressed patients. The results of the present study were consistent with the original report, thereby indicating that the MDQ is not effective in helping distinguish bipolar disorder from BPD.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Madeline Ward ◽  
Isabel Benjamin ◽  
Mark Zimmerman

The present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) Project compares patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) in an outpatient practice (n = 390) and a partial hospital setting (n = 358) on diagnostic comorbidities, symptoms experienced, suicidality, and occupational impairment. The patients in the partial program were diagnosed with significantly more psychiatric disorders and were more frequently diagnosed with dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder, alcohol and substance use disorders, adjustment disorders, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Those at the partial hospital had significantly higher levels of suicidal ideation than those in the outpatient practice. The samples did not differ on utilization of disability or suicide attempts. Treatment setting may have implications in the recognition of the disorder in clinical practice, the development and support of etiological theories, identification of core deficits, and evaluation of psychosocial morbidity associated with BPD.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Mark Zimmerman ◽  
Caroline Balling ◽  
Iwona Chelminski ◽  
Kristy Dalrymple

Abstract Background Bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are each significant public health problems. It has been frequently noted that distinguishing BPD from bipolar disorder is challenging. Consequently, reviews and commentaries have focused on differential diagnosis and identifying clinical features to distinguish the two disorders. While there is a burgeoning literature comparing patients with BPD and bipolar disorder, much less research has characterized patients with both disorders. In the current report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project, we compare psychiatric outpatients with both BPD and bipolar disorder to patients with BPD without bipolar disorder and patients with bipolar disorder without BPD. Methods Psychiatric outpatients presenting for treatment were evaluated with semi-structured interviews. The focus of the current study is the 517 patients with both BPD and bipolar disorder (n = 59), BPD without bipolar disorder (n = 330), and bipolar disorder without BPD (n = 128). Results Compared to patients with bipolar disorder, the patients with bipolar disorder and BPD had more comorbid disorders, psychopathology in their first-degree relatives, childhood trauma, suicidality, hospitalizations, time unemployed, and likelihood of receiving disability payments. The added presence of bipolar disorder in patients with BPD was associated with more posttraumatic stress disorder in the patients as well as their family, more bipolar disorder and substance use disorders in their relatives, more childhood trauma, unemployment, disability, suicide attempts, and hospitalizations. Conclusions Patients with both bipolar disorder and BPD have more severe psychosocial morbidity than patients with only one of these disorders.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Carr ◽  
Maarten de Vos ◽  
Kate E A Saunders

Heart rate variability (HRV) in psychiatric disorders has become an increasing area of interest in recent years following technological advances that enable non-invasive monitoring of autonomic nervous system regulation. However, the clinical interpretation of HRV features remain widely debated or unknown. Standardisation within studies of HRV in psychiatric disorders is poor, making it difficult to reproduce or build on previous work. Recently, a Guidelines for Reporting Articles on Psychiatry and Heart rate variability checklist has been proposed to address this issue. Here we assess studies of HRV in bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder against this checklist and discuss the implication for ongoing research in this area.


2017 ◽  
Vol 78 (8) ◽  
pp. e994-e999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris de la Rosa ◽  
María A. Oquendo ◽  
Gemma García ◽  
Barbara Stanley ◽  
Ana González-Pinto ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 358-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Zimmerman ◽  
Jennifer Martinez ◽  
Diane Young ◽  
Iwona Chelminski ◽  
Theresa A. Morgan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document