Five Essential Elements of Immediate and Mid–Term Mass Trauma Intervention: Empirical Evidence

Psychiatry ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stevan E. Hobfoll ◽  
Patricia Watson ◽  
Carl C. Bell ◽  
Richard A. Bryant ◽  
Melissa J. Brymer ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stevan E. Hobfoll ◽  
Patricia Watson ◽  
Carl C. Bell ◽  
Richard A. Bryant ◽  
Melissa J. Brymer ◽  
...  

Psychiatry ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 320-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fran H. Norris ◽  
Susan P. Stevens

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement 13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noach Milgram

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAKOB KAPELLER

AbstractRoughly 50 years ago, the eminent German philosopher and social scientist Hans Albert presented a critique of ‘Model-Platonism’ in economics to describe essential elements of the ‘neoclassical style of economic reasoning’. Specifically, Albert advanced a series of epistemological arguments to illustrate conceptual shortcomings in neoclassical theory, which may be utilized to immunize the latter against conflicting empirical evidence. This article summarizes Albert's main arguments and illustrates his most important insights by using simple propositional logic. Based on these findings, a clarification and definition of ‘Model-Platonism’ is offered and the applicability of the Model-Platonism-critique to current developments in mainstream economics is assessed. Finally, two possible extensions of Albert's argument, the concepts of oscillating informational content and axiomatic variation, are illustrated with respect to their potential for immunization against critique.


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 241-263
Author(s):  
Lucille Micheletto

Abstract The Anglo-American harm principle, and its European counterparts – the legal goods theory and the offensività principle – attempt to provide an answer to the question of which conducts can be prima facie legitimately criminalised. Despite the historical, conceptual, and practical differences between these criminalisation approaches, they share important elements, particularly from a functional and operational perspective. By merging the key aspects of these theories, this work elaborates an instrument to assess the prima facie legitimacy of criminalisation – the Integrated Legitimacy Test – that embeds their essential elements and further conceptualises them. The Test strives to overcome some of the criticisms directed against the Anglo-American and European theories by narrowly defining their core elements and linking them to empirical evidence. Moreover, its transnational nature makes it suitable to feed the criminalisation debate at the European Union level.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Uljarević ◽  
Giacomo Vivanti ◽  
Susan R. Leekam ◽  
Antonio Y. Hardan

Abstract The arguments offered by Jaswal & Akhtar to counter the social motivation theory (SMT) do not appear to be directly related to the SMT tenets and predictions, seem to not be empirically testable, and are inconsistent with empirical evidence. To evaluate the merits and shortcomings of the SMT and identify scientifically testable alternatives, advances are needed on the conceptualization and operationalization of social motivation across diagnostic boundaries.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Corbit ◽  
Chris Moore

Abstract The integration of first-, second-, and third-personal information within joint intentional collaboration provides the foundation for broad-based second-personal morality. We offer two additions to this framework: a description of the developmental process through which second-personal competence emerges from early triadic interactions, and empirical evidence that collaboration with a concrete goal may provide an essential focal point for this integrative process.


1978 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 265-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline T. Flynn

Speech, language, and hearing professionals rely on many individuals to provide information about a client. Management programs, in part, are devised, modified, and evaluated according to responses obtained from the client, family members, educators, and other professional and lay persons who have contact with the client. The speech-language pathologist has the responsibility of obtaining pertinent, complete, unbiased information about clients. This article provides an overview of the essential elements of an interview.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document