scholarly journals Linking the Response Properties of Cells in Auditory Cortex with Network Architecture: Cotuning versus Lateral Inhibition

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (37) ◽  
pp. 9151-9163 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. de la Rocha ◽  
C. Marchetti ◽  
M. Schiff ◽  
A. D. Reyes
1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 1876-1891 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Calford ◽  
M. N. Semple

1. Several studies of auditory cortex have examined the competitive inhibition that can occur when appropriate sounds are presented to each ear. However, most cortical neurons also show both excitation and inhibition in response to presentation of stimuli at one ear alone. The extent of such inhibition has not been described. Forward masking, in which a variable masking stimulus was followed by a fixed probe stimulus (within the excitatory response area), was used to examine the extent of monaural inhibition for neurons in primary auditory cortex of anesthetized cats (barbiturate or barbiturate-ketamine). Both the masking and probe stimuli were 50-ms tone pips presented to the contralateral ear. Most cortical neurons showed significant forward masking at delays beyond which masking effects in the auditory nerve are relatively small compared with those seen in cortical neurons. Analysis was primarily concerned with such components. Standard rate-level functions were also obtained and were examined for nonmonotonicity, an indication of level-dependent monaural inhibition. 2. Consistent with previous reports, a wide range of frequency tuning properties (excitatory response area shapes) was found in cortical neurons. This was matched by a wide range of forward-masking-derived inhibitory response areas. At the most basic level of analysis, these were classified according to the presence of lateral inhibition, i.e., where a probe tone at a neuron's characteristic frequency was masked by tones outside the limits of the excitatory response area. Lateral inhibition was a property of 38% of the sampled neurons. Such neurons represented 77% of those with nonmonotonic rate-level functions, indicating a strong correlation between the two indexes of monaural inhibition; however, the shapes of forward masking inhibitory response areas did not usually correspond with those required to account for the "tuning" of a neuron. In addition, it was found that level-dependent inhibition was not added to by forward masking inhibition. 3. Analysis of the discharges to individual stimulus pair presentations, under conditions of partial masking, revealed that discharges to the probe occurred independently of discharges to the preceding masker. This indicates that even when the masker is within a neuron's excitatory response area, forward masking is not a postdischarge habituation phenomenon. However, for most neurons the degree of masking summed over multiple stimulus presentations appears determined by the same stimulus parameters that determine the probability of response to the masker.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


Neuroreport ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Kadner ◽  
Erik Viirre ◽  
Derin C. Wester ◽  
Sally F. Walsh ◽  
John Hestenes ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e0149933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alva Engell ◽  
Markus Junghöfer ◽  
Alwina Stein ◽  
Pia Lau ◽  
Robert Wunderlich ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2157-2179 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. W. Spratling ◽  
M. H. Johnson

A large and influential class of neural network architectures uses postintegration lateral inhibition as a mechanism for competition. We argue that these algorithms are computationally deficient in that they fail to generate, or learn, appropriate perceptual representations under certain circumstances. An alternative neural network architecture is presented here in which nodes compete for the right to receive inputs rather than for the right to generate outputs. This form of competition, implemented through preintegration lateral inhibition, does provide appropriate coding properties and can be used to learn such representations efficiently. Furthermore, this architecture is consistent with both neuroanatomical and neurophysiological data. We thus argue that preintegration lateral inhibition has computational advantages over conventional neural network architectures while remaining equally biologically plausible.


1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 2743-2764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jos J. Eggermont

Eggermont, Jos J. Representation of spectral and temporal sound features in three cortical fields of the cat. Similarities outweigh differences. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2743–2764, 1998. This study investigates the degree of similarity of three different auditory cortical areas with respect to the coding of periodic stimuli. Simultaneous single- and multiunit recordings in response to periodic stimuli were made from primary auditory cortex (AI), anterior auditory field (AAF), and secondary auditory cortex (AII) in the cat to addresses the following questions: is there, within each cortical area, a difference in the temporal coding of periodic click trains, amplitude-modulated (AM) noise bursts, and AM tone bursts? Is there a difference in this coding between the three cortical fields? Is the coding based on the temporal modulation transfer function (tMTF) and on the all-order interspike-interval (ISI) histogram the same? Is the perceptual distinction between rhythm and roughness for AM stimuli related to a temporal versus spatial representation of AM frequency in auditory cortex? Are interarea differences in temporal response properties related to differences in frequency tuning? The results showed that: 1) AM stimuli produce much higher best modulation frequencies (BMFs) and limiting rates than periodic click trains. 2) For periodic click trains and AM noise, the BMFs and limiting rates were not significantly different for the three areas. However, for AM tones the BMF and limiting rates were about a factor 2 lower in AAF compared with the other areas. 3) The representation of stimulus periodicity in ISIs resulted in significantly lower mean BMFs and limiting rates compared with those estimated from the tMTFs. The difference was relatively small for periodic click trains but quite large for both AM stimuli, especially in AI and AII. 4) Modulation frequencies <20 Hz were represented in the ISIs, suggesting that rhythm is coded in auditory cortex in temporal fashion. 5) In general only a modest interdependence of spectral- and temporal-response properties in AI and AII was found. The BMFs were correlated positively with characteristic frequency in AAF. The limiting rate was positively correlated with the frequency-tuning curve bandwidth in AI and AII but not in AAF. Only in AAF was a correlation between BMF and minimum latency was found. Thus whereas differences were found in the frequency-tuning curve bandwidth and minimum response latencies among the three areas, the coding of periodic stimuli in these areas was fairly similar with the exception of the very poor representation of AM tones in AII. This suggests a strong parallel processing organization in auditory cortex.


NeuroImage ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 118575
Author(s):  
Isma Zulfiqar ◽  
Martin Havlicek ◽  
Michelle Moerel ◽  
Elia Formisano

2013 ◽  
Vol 298 ◽  
pp. 80-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Trujillo ◽  
Maria Magdalena Carrasco ◽  
Khaleel Razak

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e80899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alwina Stein ◽  
Alva Engell ◽  
Hidehiko Okamoto ◽  
Andreas Wollbrink ◽  
Pia Lau ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document