“Hermeneutische Logik”. Georg Misch und Josef König

2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maja Soboleva
Keyword(s):  
1927 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-228
Author(s):  
Ronald B. Levinson
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 117 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 377-389
Author(s):  
Pierre-François Moreau
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Gudrun Kühne-Bertram ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Speculum ◽  
1957 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 587-588
Author(s):  
Johannes A. Gaertner
Keyword(s):  

Speculum ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-328
Author(s):  
Marvin L. Colker
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-72
Author(s):  
Anna Citkowska-Kimla

The aim of the article is to develop a research tool for a historian of ideas in the form of an autobiography. It is about framing when a personal document meets the criteria of being a tool for a historian of political thought. The conclusions included the thought that the memories must be meta-considerations on the subject of written autobiography or an analysis of the problem of auto-biography within the framework of the created philosophy or history vision. Examples representing this narrative type were left by, among others, Johann Gottfried Herder, Johann Wolfgang Goethe, Thomas Carlyle, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Friedrich Nietzsche, Benedetto Croce, Robin G. Collingwood, and in Poland Stanisław Brzozowski. The volume of Richard Pipes’ memoirs, Memoirs of a Non-belonger, which is the foundation for the analysis, has also become part of the trend. The most important thinkers who have studied the issue of autobiography in depth include Wilhelm Dilthey and Georg Misch. The conclusions of the analysis are as follows: autobiography has a philosophical and epistemological meaning in the field of knowledge about human nature. In this sense, autobiography becomes part of anthropology, while anthropology is the foundation for the history of ideas, including political thought.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 57-78
Author(s):  
Michael Großheim

Georg Simmel is among the intellectuals taking part in the German side of the »Culture War«, parallel to the war 1914–1918. This article discusses three different meanings of »Culture War«: 1. »Culture War« as war about culture, 2. »Culture War« as war by means of culture, 3. »Culture War« as aggravated proceeding of criticism of culture. Among the motives of the »Culture War« is the reproach of »barbarism« made by Henri Bergson against the German side originating from a public debate after the destruction of the Cathedral of Reims. In the reactions of German intellectuals (alongside Georg Simmel were Alfred Döblin, Friedrich Gundolf, Max Scheler and Georg Misch) a reinterpretation of the concept of culture is apparent, inspired by philosophy of life and leading to a peculiar »ethic of the creative power of culture«. Simmel’s examination of the generic case of the Cathedral of Reims conclusively serves as prototype of a criticism of this approach: German intellectuals confuse metaphors stemming from the sphere of nature with those of culture without reflection, thus obliterating essential differences between those spheres.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document