scholarly journals The Medicare Mental Health Coverage Gap: How Licensed Professional Counselors Navigate Medicare-Ineligible Provider Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 310-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew C. Fullen ◽  
Jonathan D. Wiley ◽  
Amy A. Morgan
2022 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-48
Author(s):  
Amy A. Morgan ◽  
Matthew C. Fullen ◽  
Jonathan D. Wiley

Nearly one in four Medicare beneficiaries have been diagnosed with mental health or substance use disorders, and research indicates this population responds well to mental health treatment. However, Medicare policy omits licensed mental health counselors (LMHCs) and licensed marriage and family therapists (LMFTs) as approved providers, exacerbating an existing national provider shortage. Emerging research demonstrates that the provider omission, referred to as the Medicare mental health coverage gap (MMHCG), profoundly impacts excluded providers and the communities they serve. This paper represents a synthesis of the most current scholarship on Medicare research, policy, and advocacy. In particular, we explore three ways the MMHCG impacts providers and beneficiaries alike: limiting provider choices, thwarting continuity of care, and creating challenging decisions for beneficiaries and providers. Our aim is to help mental health counselors better understand and navigate the MMHCG and aid in advocacy efforts for legislation to include LMHCs and LMFTs as approved Medicare providers.


1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 887-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Freddy A. Paniagua ◽  
Richard M. Grimes ◽  
Michael O'Boyle ◽  
Karen D. Wagner ◽  
Victor L. Tan ◽  
...  

A total of 6804 mental health professionals, e.g., licensed and certified psychologists, licensed professional counselors, in Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas were mailed a questionnaire regarding HIV/AIDS topics professionals might recommend for educational programs. Participants were asked to rate how strongly they would recommend each topic. The return rate was 31% (2121). The percentage of participants who did not recommend the topics was low (0.7%–10.9%). Most topics were either recommended (6.5%–50.2%) or strongly recommended (29.0%–92.8%). Topics with ratings of 80% of participants endorsing the strongly recommended rating included psychological crises associated with learning one is HIV positive, psychosocial issues, and counseling dying clients regarding grief, loss, and legal issues. The results are discussed in terms of continuing to develop educational programs targeting mental health professionals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 243-251
Author(s):  
Matthew C. Fullen ◽  
Nancy Brossoie ◽  
Megan L. Dolbin-MacNab ◽  
Gerard Lawson ◽  
Jonathan D. Wiley

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 94-94
Author(s):  
Matthew Fullen ◽  
Megan Dolbin-MacNab ◽  
Nancy Brossoie ◽  
Jonathan Wiley ◽  
Gerard Lawson

Abstract Medicare is the primary insurance provider for approximately 51 million older adults, including those who seek mental health care. Medicare provider eligibility was last updated in 1989, and approximately one-third of the graduate-level mental health workforce (i.e., Licensed Professional Counselors and Licensed Marriage and Family Therapists) is excluded from Medicare, despite these professionals participating in Medicaid, TRICARE, the Veterans Administration, and private insurance plans. This Medicare mental health coverage gap (MMHCG) raises concerns about older adults’ access to mental health care, resulting in a policy misalignment between Medicare’s provider regulations and a growing number of older adults seeking mental health care. However, little is known about the precise impact of the MMHCG. To better understand how the MMHCG impacts older adults, we interviewed 17 Medicare-insured individuals about their experiences accessing mental health services. Using a phenomenological framework to analyze our data, we found that Medicare recipients described several consequences, such as: 1) a detrimental impact on their mental health and well-being; 2) concerns about having to start over with new providers due to commencing mental health treatment only to have services interrupted once the provider is no longer Medicare-reimbursable; and 3) relying on pro bono services from Medicare-excluded providers with uncertainty about the long-term sustainability of these arrangements. The presenters will describe how these findings fit within the current Medicare mental health service context, including the direct impact on older adults’ mental health. Discussion will also focus on policy implications of the findings and possible solutions for addressing the MMHCG.


2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 65
Author(s):  
Joyce Frieden

Author(s):  
Sara E. Evans-Lacko ◽  
Nancy Baum ◽  
Marion Danis ◽  
Andrea Biddle ◽  
Susan Goold

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document