Supreme, Ancestral, and Personal Gods

Author(s):  
Robert Parker
Keyword(s):  

In this chapter I consider special issues and categories: the meaning of gods said to be ‘of ‘ an individual, a form of expression found both in Anatolia and Syria, though not Greece, and perhaps having distinct origins in the two cases; the closest Greek equivalents to such gods ‘of’ an individual, namely his ‘ancestral’ gods, and the development which the concept of ancestral god underwent outside Greece; the forms of expression used to name a top god; the place of deities such as ‘the divine’ and ‘angels’ in a divine hierarchy. I enter the controversy about ‘Highest God’, siding with those who deny that this is a distinct new cult but emphasising the interest of the ‘anonymisation’ of that title.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gil Diesendruck

The tendency to essentialize social groups is universal, and arises early in development. This tendency is associated with negative intergroup attitudes and behaviors, and has thus encouraged the search for remedies for the emergence of essentialism. In this vein, great attention has been devoted to uncovering the cognitive foundations of essentialism. In this chapter, I suggest that attention should also be turned towards the motivational foundations of essentialism. I propose that considerations of power and group identity, but especially a “need to belong”, may encourage children’s essentialization of social groups. Namely, from a young age, children are keen to feel members of a group, and that their membership is secure and exclusive. Essentialism is the conceptual gadget that satisfies these feelings. And to the extent that groups are defined by what they do, this motivated essentialism also impels children to be adamant about the maintenance of unique group behaviors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document