scholarly journals DEVELOPMENT AND PERFORMANCE OF LILLE'S FOURIER TRANSFORM MILLIMETER-WAVE SPECTROMETER

Author(s):  
Luyao Zou ◽  
E. Alekseev ◽  
L. Margulマs ◽  
R. Motiyenko
1992 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 4108-4111 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Schwarz ◽  
A. Guarnieri ◽  
J.‐U. Grabow ◽  
J. Doose

1985 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 508-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Bestmann ◽  
H. Dreizler ◽  
J. M. Vacherand ◽  
D. Boucher ◽  
B. P. van Eijck ◽  
...  

The ground state rotational spectrum of propane has been investigated between 6.4 and 26.5 GHz with a microwave Fourier transform spectrometer and between 140 and 300 GHz with a millimeter-wave spectrometer. High J transitions have been measured and fitted to a centrifugally distorted Hamiltonian including some sextic coefficients. The results of the analysis are sufficiently accurate for the prediction of all strong transitions of astrophysical interest.


Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1117
Author(s):  
Bin Li ◽  
Zhikang Jiang ◽  
Jie Chen

Computing the sparse fast Fourier transform (sFFT) has emerged as a critical topic for a long time because of its high efficiency and wide practicability. More than twenty different sFFT algorithms compute discrete Fourier transform (DFT) by their unique methods so far. In order to use them properly, the urgent topic of great concern is how to analyze and evaluate the performance of these algorithms in theory and practice. This paper mainly discusses the technology and performance of sFFT algorithms using the aliasing filter. In the first part, the paper introduces the three frameworks: the one-shot framework based on the compressed sensing (CS) solver, the peeling framework based on the bipartite graph and the iterative framework based on the binary tree search. Then, we obtain the conclusion of the performance of six corresponding algorithms: the sFFT-DT1.0, sFFT-DT2.0, sFFT-DT3.0, FFAST, R-FFAST, and DSFFT algorithms in theory. In the second part, we make two categories of experiments for computing the signals of different SNRs, different lengths, and different sparsities by a standard testing platform and record the run time, the percentage of the signal sampled, and the L0, L1, and L2 errors both in the exactly sparse case and the general sparse case. The results of these performance analyses are our guide to optimize these algorithms and use them selectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document