scholarly journals Common Bile Duct Stone Caused by Migrated Surgical Clip 10 Years after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Sam Ha ◽  
Yoo Ri Lim ◽  
Ji Hyeon Lee ◽  
Jeong Han Sim ◽  
Jin Sae Yoo ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Mukesh Kumar ◽  
Sanjay Kumar Suman ◽  
Pawan Kumar Jha ◽  
Debarshi Jana

Background: Cholecystectomy is the standard and the only curative treatment for acutecholecystitis. The complications of acute cholecystitis are disastrous to the patients; on the other hand, conservative treatment is associated with recurrence of symptoms and other complications as common bile duct stone. The aim of this study is to weight out the complication of emergency surgery against the complications of conservative treatment in patients with acute cholecystitis. Materials andmethods: A total of 80 patients were included in the study. All Patients underwent early laparoscopiccholecystectomy or interval laparoscopic cholecystectomies for acute calcularcholecystitis from October 2017 to September 2019 were included in the study. Results: The overall complication rate was 15% (6 of 40 in early group and 10% (4 of 40) in the delayed group. One case of delayed group suffering recurrent acute attack and the other one suffering common bile duct stone, there was no major bile duct injury in the delayed group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and cost-effective approach for the treatment of acute cholecystitis within 72 h after the onset of attack.


1992 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 611-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ghazanfari ◽  
Prasad R. Gollapudi ◽  
Frank J. Konicek ◽  
Arturo Olivera ◽  
Manuel Madayag ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. A1220
Author(s):  
C.A. Floresguerra ◽  
I Ponce ◽  
S.A. Copeland ◽  
I.W. Browder

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (205) ◽  
pp. 117-123
Author(s):  
Mukund Raj Joshi ◽  
Tanka Prasad Bohara ◽  
Shail Rupakheti ◽  
Deepak Raj Singh

Introduction: Concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis are commonly managed in two stage procedure, endoscopic management of common bile duct stone followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in different time and setting. We perform these two procedures in same sitting in operating room set up. We evaluated the procedure in terms of outcome, feasibility and complications. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study carried out since April 2013 to August 2016 in all patients who had undergone single stage endoscopic and laparoscopic management of concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Patient’s demography, procedural time for different procedure and procedure in total and post-operative complications were recorded and analyzed with suitable statistical methods. Results: Out of 50 cases enrolled, 2 patients were converted to open. Out of 48 patients, 3 needed re-attempt for completion. Majority were female 36 (72%), mean age was 39.48years. Mean common bile duct diameter and mean stone size was 11.43±2.63 cm and 7.99±2.01cm, respectively. Mean of total procedural time was 90.93± 33.68 minutes. In most of the cases, laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed first followed by endoscopic method (66.7%). Total procedural time was less in the patients who underwent laparoscopy first in comparison to endoscopy first. Clinically significant complications like cholangitis, pancreatitis and duodenal perforation occurred in 7 patients. Out of 4 patients who developed pancreatitis, one had severe acute pancreatitis requiring prolonged hospitalization. Conclusion: Single stage management of common bile duct and gall bladder stone by laparoscopic and endoscopic method is feasible in our setup with acceptable results. Endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stone if performed first, is associated with longer procedural time. Keywords: choledocholithiasis; cholelithiasis; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anas M. Hussameddin ◽  
Iba Ibrahim AlFawaz ◽  
Reema Fahad AlOtaibi

Surgical clip migration into the common bile duct with subsequent stone formation is a rare complication following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Very few cases have been reported in the literature. We report a case of bile duct stone formation around a migrated surgical clip 16 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patient presented with right upper quadrant pain, fever, and chills for one week. Investigation with abdominal ultrasound showed dilatation of the common bile duct and moderate dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts. The diagnosis was confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and the patient was managed successfully with sphincterotomy and stone extraction. The exact mechanism of clip migration is not fully understood. Presenting symptoms are similar to non-clip-induced choledocholithiasis. Time of presentation can vary significantly with an average of 26 months. Most cases reported in the literature required surgical intervention. Clip migration should be considered in the differential diagnosis of postcholecystectomy biliary colic and cholangitis. Management with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is the treatment of choice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document