Phase III, multicentre, double-blind, randomised withdrawal study of osilodrostat (LCI699) in patients with Cushing's disease: a study design

Author(s):  
Akira Shimatsu ◽  
Nicholas Sauter ◽  
Roxzana Kelly ◽  
Peter Unge ◽  
Xin Zhi ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beverly MK Biller ◽  
John Newell-Price ◽  
Maria Fleseriu ◽  
Xavier Bertagna ◽  
James Findling ◽  
...  

Endocrine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 156-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Petersenn ◽  
L. R. Salgado ◽  
J. Schopohl ◽  
L. Portocarrero-Ortiz ◽  
G. Arnaldi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 182 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Newell-Price ◽  
Rosario Pivonello ◽  
Antoine Tabarin ◽  
Maria Fleseriu ◽  
Przemysław Witek ◽  
...  

Objective Monitoring of patients with Cushing’s disease on cortisol-lowering drugs is usually performed with urinary free cortisol (UFC). Late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC) has an established role in screening for hypercortisolism and can help to detect the loss of cortisol circadian rhythm. Less evidence exists regarding the usefulness of LNSC in monitoring pharmacological response in Cushing’s disease. Design Exploratory analysis evaluating LNSC during a Phase III study of long-acting pasireotide in Cushing’s disease (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01374906). Methods Mean LNSC (mLNSC) was calculated from two samples, collected on the same days as the first two of three 24-h urine samples (used to calculate mean UFC [mUFC]). Clinical signs of hypercortisolism were evaluated over time. Results At baseline, 137 patients had evaluable mLNSC measurements; 91.2% had mLNSC exceeding the upper limit of normal (ULN; 3.2 nmol/L). Of patients with evaluable assessments at month 12 (n = 92), 17.4% had both mLNSC ≤ULN and mUFC ≤ULN; 22.8% had mLNSC ≤ULN, and 45.7% had mUFC ≤ULN. There was high variability in LNSC (intra-patient coefficient of variation (CV): 49.4%) and UFC (intra-patient CV: 39.2%). mLNSC levels decreased over 12 months of treatment and paralleled changes in mUFC. Moderate correlation was seen between mLNSC and mUFC (Spearman’s correlation: ρ = 0.50 [all time points pooled]). Greater improvements in systolic/diastolic blood pressure and weight were seen in patients with both mLNSC ≤ULN and mUFC ≤ULN. Conclusion mUFC and mLNSC are complementary measurements for monitoring treatment response in Cushing’s disease, with better clinical outcomes seen for patients in whom both mUFC and mLNSC are controlled.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Feelders ◽  
Rosario Pivonello ◽  
Alberto Pedroncelli ◽  
Heather Patino ◽  
Moncy Ye ◽  
...  

Endocrine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 516-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Findling ◽  
Maria Fleseriu ◽  
John Newell-Price ◽  
Stephan Petersenn ◽  
Rosario Pivonello ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (01) ◽  
pp. 8-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Livia Gheorghiu ◽  
Francesca Negreanu ◽  
Maria Fleseriu

AbstractPituitary adenomas represent approximately 15% of brain tumors; incidence is significantly on the increase due to widespread use of magnetic resonance imaging. Surgery remains the first-line treatment for most tumors overall. The role of dopaminergic agonists (DAs) and somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) in the treatment of pituitary adenomas is quite well established for prolactinomas and growth hormone (GH) excess. However, over the last decade new multi-receptor binding SRLs are increasingly used for treatment of acromegaly and Cushing’s disease. SRLs/DA chimeric compounds seem to have enhanced potency and efficacy when compared to that of individual SRLs or DA receptor agonists according to preclinical data. However, following negative results, more research is needed to determine if this interesting mechanism will translate into positive clinical effects for acromegaly patients. Furthermore, new agents that block adrenal steroidogenesis have been developed in phase III clinical trials for Cushing’s disease and several new compounds working at the pituitary level and/or blocking the glucocorticoid receptor are also in development. Combination therapy of drugs with similar or different mechanisms (possibly synergistic) are also on the increase. A growing awareness regarding all mechanisms involved in both control of pituitary secretion and cellular proliferation might allow for sole medical treatment of pituitary adenomas, especially macroadenomas, rather than surgery and/or radiation therapy, in the future. Moreover, the underlying decision on how to treat patients with pituitary adenomas should be individualized on a case-by-case basis with not only a goal of tumor shrinkage and biochemical control, but also of improving patients’ quality of life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document