SPAC-Prospekte in Deutschland und den Niederlanden und das Public Statement der ESMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 390-411
Author(s):  
Ben W. Fuhrmann
Keyword(s):  

Zusammenfassung Seit Anfang des Jahres 2021 gewinnt der beispiellose SPAC-Boom aus den USA nun langsam auch in Europa an Boden. Nach langer Zurückhaltung hat sich die ESMA Anfang Juli erstmals mit einem Public Statement zu SPACs geäußert. Darin erklärt sie ihre Erwartungen an SPAC-IPO-Prospekte. Der Wertpapierprospekt ist das zentrale Dokument eines jeden SPAC-Börsengangs. Der Beitrag analysiert, wo die Marktpraxis an den zwei wichtigsten europäischen Finanzmarktplätzen in Bezug auf die neuen Anforderungen der ESMA steht und welche Umsetzung sich für die einzelnen Angaben empfiehlt. Dabei wird auch gezeigt, dass manche Vorstellungen der ESMA in Bezug auf die Vorgaben der ProspektVO deutlich zu weit gehen. Ferner wird die bisher kaum diskutierte Rechtsnatur eines Public Statements erschlossen und der Ansatz der ESMA in das Vorgehen anderer Aufsichtsbehörden eingeordnet.

2006 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 179-205
Author(s):  
Mellie Naydenova

This paper focuses on the mural scheme executed in Haddon Hall Chapel shortly after 1427 for Sir Richard Vernon. It argues that at that time the chapel was also being used as a parish church, and that the paintings were therefore both an expression of private devotion and a public statement. This is reflected in their subject matter, which combines themes associated with popular beliefs, the public persona of the Hall's owner and the Vernon family's personal devotions. The remarkable inventiveness and complexity of the iconography is matched by the exceptionally sophisticated style of the paintings. Attention is also given to part of the decoration previously thought to be contemporary with this fifteenth-century scheme but for which an early sixteenth-century date is now proposed on the basis of stylistic and other evidence.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 96-104
Author(s):  
Josh Michael Hayes ◽  

This paper proceeds by investigating three ‘topoi’ or sites within Heidegger’s texts where the presence of Stoicism most fundamentally articulates itself as critical to his understanding of the truth of being (aletheia) and its historical destining as Ereignis. We will begin with the “Letter on Humanism” (1947), the most comprehensive “public’ statement of his later thought-by first considering how Ereignis-often translated as the event or event of appropriation to indicate the historical destining of being-might be said to be consonant with the Stoic doctrine of oikeiosis-the appropriation or familiarization with oneself echoed by both Chrysippus and Hierocles. In doing so, we will attempt to trace Heidegger’s interpretation of oikeiosis back into the origins of his fundamental ontology by turning to the genesis of care/cura (Sorge) in Sein und Zeit (1927)-specifically the Roman myth of Hyginus that bears its name-before concluding with an early lecture course, Introduction to the Phenomenology of Religion (1920-1921) where his engagement with the Pauline tradition reveals oikeiosis to be a hidden enigma in his thinking about the meaning of being and its historical destining.


Author(s):  
Daniel Byman

What Are the Key Al Qaeda Affiliates? In his May 23, 2013, speech on counterterrorism—perhaps his most important public statement on this issue so far—President Obama contended, “Today, the core of al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan is on a path to defeat.” However,...


2020 ◽  
pp. 151-186
Author(s):  
Sanford C. Goldberg

This chapter argues for a distinctive kind of conversational pressure bearing distinctly on audiences to a mutually observed statement or assertion: the normative pressure to signal when one disagrees. The argument for this conclusion appeals to two main claims: first, that conversational participants are entitled to expect cooperation from other participants; and second, that silent rejection of a public statement is marked as uncooperative. The result is that conversational participants are (presumptively but defeasibly) entitled to expect no silent rejection of a mutually observed statement, and this expectation gives participants a (practical) reason to indicate any disagreement or doubts when they observe such a statement. This argument avoids objections levelled against Pettit’s account of the significance of conversational silence. The chapter concludes by addressing the variety of contexts in which the entitlement to expect no silent rejection is itself defeated (including but not limited to conditions of oppression or ‘silencing’).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document