scholarly journals The problem of preschool wheeze: new developments, new questions

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 40-50
Author(s):  
Andrew BUSH

Preschool wheeze is a common and often difficult to treat symptom. It may rarely be the first presentation of a severe underlying condition. Preschool wheeze is clearly a syndrome, not a single entity, and thus ripe for phenotyping. A number of approaches to phenotyping have been adopted. Epidemiology, based on the temporal patterns of symptoms, has taught us a lot about the medium and long-term implications of early life events, but is not useful for treatment planning. Atopic status is also not useful. Instead, symptom pattern (episodic (viral) and multiple trigger) should be used to decide on treatment. Reduced lung function at birth is associated with a number of maternal factors, including smoking (both by direct and epigenetic mechanisms), atopic status, and pregnancy complications; these children tend to have transient wheeze. Children whose symptoms persist into mid-childhood are born with normal lung function, but have evidence of airflow obstruction at 4–6 years of age. Early atopic sensitization is important in this group. Treatment of pre-school wheeze should be based on relief of present symptoms; there is no known therapy which prevents progression from episodic to multiple trigger symptoms and asthma. Episodic (viral) wheeze is a neutrophilic disease and should be treated with intermittent therapy. Options include inhaled anticholinergics or short-acting β-2 agonists, oral leukotriene receptor antagonists and short-course, high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Prophylactic inhaled corticosteroids are not useful. Neither prophylactic nor inhaled corticosteroids are effective in preventing progression from an episodic viral to a multiple-trigger pattern. Multipletrigger wheeze may merit a three-step trial (trial period, stop if apparent response, restart only if symptoms return) of prophylactic inhaled corticosteroids or leukotriene receptor antagonists. Recent data have shown that prednisolone should not be a routine treatment for acute exacerbations of episodic (viral) wheeze, but should only be used for really severe excacerbations, defined as being more severe than a routine admission and likely needing high dependency care. This is especially true in the setting of multiple trigger wheeze. Keywords: asthma, inhaled corticosteroid, leukotriene, neutrophil, prednisolone

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Dorais ◽  
Lucie Blais ◽  
Isabelle Chabot ◽  
Jacques LeLorier

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Macie ◽  
K Wooldrage ◽  
J Manfreda ◽  
NR Anthonisen

Patient characteristics and prescribing patterns during the introduction of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) in Manitoba are described using the provincial health database. Residents of Manitoba with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchitis or claims for respiratory medications were identified. Six thousand forty-one of 160,626 (3.8%) patients received LTRA; the likelihood of receiving LTRA increased if a patient was younger than 15 years, lived in a rural locale, had asthma, had frequent physician visits or used inhaled corticosteroids. Subsequent prescriptions (68%) were associated with the number of physician visits and inhaled corticosteroid use, which were thought to be indexes of severity. Patients, especially children, who received more than five prescriptions showed evidence of increased asthma control, but there was little evidence of benefit in less selected patient groups due, at least in part, to poor compliance with all respiratory drugs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document