scholarly journals Evaluation of a public program at the 28th Annual Conference of Occupational Health Professionals: Multiple disciplines considering the importance of occupational health nurses

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 271-278
Author(s):  
Satoru Kanamori ◽  
Mari Kusumoto ◽  
Chikako Shirata ◽  
Saori Yasukura ◽  
Noriko Tanaka ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marloes Vooijs ◽  
Daniël Bossen ◽  
Jan L. Hoving ◽  
Haije Wind ◽  
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

2019 ◽  
pp. 229-261
Author(s):  
Tony Williams ◽  
Neil Pearce

Occupational health professionals frequently advise about return to work after surgery. Providing advice can be challenging, and considerable misunderstanding exists among patients and clinicians. One patient may return to work 1 week after a hysterectomy while another is absent for 5 months. Advice on returning to work after surgery should be based on knowledge of tissue healing processes, along with adverse effects of smoking and obesity, perioperative infection, and co-morbidity. Medical issues are often confounded by inconsistent advice, inappropriate beliefs, and unhelpful motivators. There is a recognized limitation in the evidence base. However, consensus is available from a number of guidelines drawn up by various expert bodies, which are covered in this chapter.


2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 386-388
Author(s):  
Mangala Patil ◽  
Kate J Jeffery

Author(s):  
Martina Michaelis ◽  
Elisabeth Maria Balint ◽  
Florian Junne ◽  
Stephan Zipfel ◽  
Harald Gündel ◽  
...  

The rising burden of common mental disorders (CMDs) in employees requires strategies for prevention. No systematic data exist about how those involved perceive their roles, responsibilities, and interactions with other professional groups. Therefore, we performed a multi-professional standardized survey with health professionals in Germany. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 133 occupational health physicians (OHPs), 136 primary care physicians (PCPs), 186 psychotherapists (PTs), and 172 human resource managers (HRMs). Inter alia, they were asked which health professionals working in the company health service and in the outpatient care or in the sector of statutory insurance agents should play a key role in the primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of CMDs in employees. The McNemar test was used in order to compare the attributed roles among the professionals involved. With regard to CMDs, all the professional groups involved in this study declared OHPs as the most relevant pillar in the field of prevention. In primary prevention, HRMs regarded themselves, OHPs, and health insurance agents as equally relevant in terms of prevention. PTs indicated an important role for employee representatives in this field. In secondary prevention, PCPs were regarded as important as OHPs. HRMs indicated themselves as equally important as OHPs and PCPs. In tertiary prevention, only OHPs identified themselves as main protagonists. The other groups marked a variety of several professions. There is a common acceptance from the parties involved that might help the first steps be taken toward overcoming barriers, e.g., by developing a common framework for quality-assured intersectional cooperation in the field of CMD prevention in employees.


AAOHN Journal ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-77
Author(s):  
Patricia E. Hunt

Occupational health nurses and other health professionals are at the forefront of the issues of reproductive health in the workplace. Many complexities are involved, and the best information available may be inconclusive. Thus, these issues represent a challenging area where occupational health nurses can make important contributions. A great accountability for communication about reproductive toxins falls on occupational health professionals. They must make every effort to be knowledgeable, to control workplace risks for everyone, and to educate and counsel employees on reproductive issues in the workplace.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document