scholarly journals Racial disparity in age and genotype defines urban hepatitis C patient profiles in the recent direct-acting antiviral era

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 190-197
Author(s):  
Ria Minawala BS ◽  
Katherine Wong ◽  
Paul Naylor ◽  
Murray Ehrinpreis ◽  
Milton Mutchnick
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Racial Disparity ◽  
Direct Acting Antiviral ◽  
Patient Profiles ◽  
Direct Acting

Su1003 RACIAL DISPARITY IN CHRONIC HEPATITIS C TREATMENT SUCCESS WITH DIRECT-ACTING ANTIVIRAL AGENTS.

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-494
Author(s):  
Jahnavi Koppala ◽  
Mobashshir Alam ◽  
Ryan W. Walters ◽  
Sirish Rao ◽  
Elliott Baker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Hepatitis ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Chronic Hepatitis C ◽  
Racial Disparity ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Antiviral Agents ◽  
Hepatitis C Treatment ◽  
Direct Acting Antiviral ◽  
Direct Acting ◽  
Direct Acting Antiviral Agents

New Epidemiologic Data Regarding Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Romania

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-386
Author(s):  
Mircea Manuc ◽  
Carmen M. Preda ◽  
Corneliu P. Popescu ◽  
Cristian Baicuș ◽  
Theodor Voiosu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Drug Users ◽  
Antiviral Agent ◽  
Virologic Response ◽  
Advanced Fibrosis ◽  
Direct Acting Antiviral ◽  
Genotype 1B ◽  
Direct Acting ◽  
End Stage

Background & Aims: Literature data suggest that HCV genotype-1b is present in 93-99% of the Romanian patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). We present the genotyping tests recently performed on patients with HCV and advanced fibrosis eligible for the Direct-Acting Antiviral (DAA) therapy, as well as the prevalence of these cases across Romania.Methods: The genotyping method was performed on 7,421 HCV patients with advanced fibrosis. The detection method was automatic real time PCR platform M2000 (Abbott). Every subject was introduced into a database including age, sex, county and address.Results: Genotype 1b was almost exclusively present: 7,392/7,421 (99.6%). Genotype 1b patients were 19.6% from Bucharest, 49% were males, with a median age of 60 years. Genotype non-1b was encountered in 29/7,421 subjects (0.4%), 62% were males, 69% from Bucharest and the median age was 52 years. Most of the subjects (75%) were in the 6th and 7th age decade. The prevalence of these cases varied significantly across Romanian counties: the highest was in Bucharest (61.3/105), Bihor (47/105), Iasi (46/105) and Constanța (43/105), and the lowest in Ilfov (2.8/105), Harghita (3.7/105), Covasna (5.4/105) and Maramureș (8.8/105) (p<0.001).Conclusions: Genotype 1b is encountered in 99.6% of patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis from Romania. The presence of genotypes non-1b is more common in Bucharest, in males and at a younger age. There are significant differences regarding the distribution of these cases across Romania: the highest rates are in Bucharest, Bihor, Iasi and Constanta.Abbreviations: BMI: body mass index; DAA: direct-acting antiviral agent; GT: genotype; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV: hepatitis C virus; IDU: intravenous drug users; MELD: model for end stage liver disease; NASH: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; SVR; sustained virologic response.

Efficacy of Direct-Acting Antiviral Combination Therapy in the Treat-ment of Hepatitis C Virus Among Kidney Transplant Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al Atbee ◽  
Saad Shaheen Al-Taher ◽  
Majid Alabbood
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C Virus ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Virus Infection ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Virological Response ◽  
Hepatitis C Virus Infection ◽  
Direct Acting Antiviral ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Patients ◽  
Direct Acting

Background: Up to date, there is no consensus on the best combination of direct-acting antiviral to treat hepatitis C virus in kidney transplant recipients. Objective: This study aims to analyze the efficacy of combination of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir regimen for treatment of hepatitis C virus infected kidney transplant patients. Method: A cross-sectional study conducted in a nephrology clinic and the Nephrology Center in Basrah Teaching Hospital from June 2015 to June 2018. Ledifos (90 mg Ledipasvir and 400 mg Sofosbuvir fixed-dose) was given as a single daily dose for all the participants for 12 weeks. Response for therapy was tested by follow up hepatitis C virus load at the end of 12 weeks and 24 weeks. The sustained virological response was defined as negative viral load of hepatitis C virus (aviremia) at the end of therapy. This study was done according to the Helsinki Congress. Results: A total of 60 (16 females) patients with renal transplantation and hepatitis C virus infection were included. Mean age was 40±6.2 years. A sustained virological response observed in all of the patients who received Ledifos after 12 and 24 weeks of therapy for all genotypes (1a, 1b and 4); p= 0.0001. Genotype 1a was more prevalent among males, 34 (56.6%); p= 0.0001, and it was the most common genotype tested negative serologically, 11 (18.3%). Conclusion: Ledifos therapy is effective and safe option for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in the post–renal transplant setting.

scholarly journals A hepatitis C-vírus-fertőzés szűrése, diagnosztikája, antivirális terápiája, kezelés utáni gondozása. Magyar konszenzusajánlás. Érvényes: 2016. október 15-től

2017 ◽  
Vol 158 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Béla Hunyady ◽  
Zsuzsanna Gerlei ◽  
Judit Gervain ◽  
Gábor Horváth ◽  
Gabriella Lengyel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Dual Therapy ◽  
Pegylated Interferon ◽  
Insurance Fund ◽  
Hepatic Decompensation ◽  
Direct Acting Antiviral ◽  
Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin ◽  
Direct Acting

Treatment of hepatitis C is based on a national consensus guideline updated six-monthly according to local availability and affordability of approved therapies through a transparent allocation system in Hungary. This updated guideline incorporates some special new aspects, including recommendations for screening, diagnostics, use and allocation of novel direct acting antiviral agents. Indication of therapy in patients with no contraindication is based on demonstration of viral replication with consequent inflammation and/or fibrosis in the liver. Non-invasive methods (elastographies and biochemical methods) are preferred for liver fibrosis staging. The budget allocated for these patients is limited. Therefore, expensive novel direct acting antiviral combinations as first line treatment are reimbursed only, if the freely available, but less effective and more toxic pegylated interferon plus ribavirin dual therapy deemed to prone high chance of adverse events and/or low chance of cure. Priority is given to those with urgent need based on a pre-defined scoring system reflecting mainly the stage of the liver disease, but considering also additional factors, i.e., hepatic decompensation, other complications, activity and progression of liver disease, risk of transmission and other special issues. Approved treatments are restricted to the most cost-effective combinations based on the cost per sustained virological response value in different patient categories with consensus amongst treating physicians, the National Health Insurance Fund and patient’s organizations. Interferon-free treatments and shorter therapy durations are preferred. Orv. Hetil., 2017, 158(Suppl. 1), 3–22.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document