scholarly journals Diagnostic challenges in gastric adenocarcinoma: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 96-98
Author(s):  
Trudy Hong

Occam’s razor dictates that the simplest diagnosis is usually the correct one. In ascites of unknown origin, the top differentials must include cirrhosis, malignancy and cardiac failure. Investigations such as ascitic fluid cytology and computed tomography can help identify the underlying pathology, however, these investigations do not have perfect specificity and sensitivity. Thus, “normal” investigations cannot be used to completely dismiss important differentials. In a middle-aged patient with no evidence of cirrhosis or cardiac failure, Occam’s razor suggests that a surgeon thoroughly consider and definitively exclude an occult malignancy prior to removing it from the list of differentials.

1980 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 841-842
Author(s):  
RONALD W. MARX

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1351
Author(s):  
Mengshu Wang ◽  
Xufei Luo ◽  
Ling Wang ◽  
Janne Estill ◽  
Meng Lv ◽  
...  

Background Lung ultrasound (LUS) and computed tomography (CT) can both be used for diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the agreement between LUS and CT is unknown. Purpose to compare the agreement of LUS and CT in the diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia caused by COVID-19. Materials and Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, Chinese Biomedicine Literature, and WHO COVID-19 databases to identify studies that compared LUS with CT in the diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia caused by COVID-19. We calculated the pooled overall, positive and negative percent agreements, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the standard receiver operating curve (SROC) for LUS in the diagnosis of COVID-19 compared with CT. Results We identified 1896 records, of which nine studies involving 531 patients were finally included. The pooled overall, positive and negative percentage agreements of LUS for the diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia caused by COVID-19 compared with CT were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI] 43–99%), 96% (95% CI, 80–99%, I2 = 92.15%) and 80% (95%CI, 60–92%, I2 = 92.85%), respectively. DOR was 37.41 (95% CI, 9.43–148.49, I2 = 63.9%), and the area under the SROC curve was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92–0.96). The quality of evidence for both specificity and sensitivity was low because of heterogeneity and risk of bias. Conclusion The level of diagnostic agreement between LUS and CT in the diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia caused by COVID-19 is high. LUS can be therefore considered as an equally accurate alternative for CT in situations where molecular tests are not available.


Author(s):  
Ashish Sharma ◽  
Nilesh Kumar ◽  
Nikulaa Parachuri ◽  
Sonali Singh ◽  
Francesco Bandello ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 914-917
Author(s):  
Tadeusz J. Ulrych ◽  
Allan D. Woodbury

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document