Adverse Childhood Experiences of Low-Income Urban Youth

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. X13-X13 ◽  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. e13-e20 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Wade ◽  
J. A. Shea ◽  
D. Rubin ◽  
J. Wood

2021 ◽  
Vol 296 ◽  
pp. 113679
Author(s):  
Sunny H. Shin ◽  
Gabriela Ksinan Jiskrova ◽  
Tiffany Kimbrough ◽  
Karen Tabb Dina ◽  
Elizabeth Overall Lee ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua P. Mersky ◽  
ChienTi Plummer Lee

Abstract Background Adverse childhood experiences (ACE) are associated with an array of health consequences in later life, but few studies have examined the effects of ACEs on women’s birth outcomes. Methods We analyzed data gathered from a sample of 1848 low-income women who received services from home visiting programs in Wisconsin. Archival program records from a public health database were used to create three birth outcomes reflecting each participant’s reproductive health history: any pregnancy loss; any preterm birth; any low birthweight. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to test the linear and non-linear effects of ACEs on birth outcomes, controlling for age, race/ethnicity, and education. Results Descriptive analyses showed that 84.4% of women had at least one ACE, and that 68.2% reported multiple ACEs. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that cumulative ACE scores were associated with an increased likelihood of pregnancy loss (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.08–1.17), preterm birth (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.01–1.12), and low birthweight (OR = 1.08; 95% CI = 1.03–1.15). Additional analyses revealed that the ACE-birthweight association deviated from a linear, dose-response pattern. Conclusions Findings confirmed that high levels of childhood adversity are associated with poor birth outcomes. Alongside additive risk models, future ACE research should test interactive risk models and causal mechanisms through which childhood adversity compromises reproductive health.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 749-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret K. Hargreaves ◽  
Charles P. Mouton ◽  
Jianguo Liu ◽  
Yuan E. Zhou ◽  
William J. Blot

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Davidson ◽  
Eric Carlin

This article examines the growth of resilience-focused youth policy in Scotland, and its association with the proliferation of the ACE (Adverse Childhood Experiences) agenda. To do this, it critically compares policy discourse with qualitative data on young people’s experiences of growing up in two similar, low-income neighbourhoods. This combination leads us to problematise resilience-informed practice, relative to the voices of young people. Our review demonstrates that by emphasising individual protective factors, resilience discourse reframes inequalities embedded within certain neighbourhoods, and the specific impacts on young people who live there. The consequence is not an assets-based youth policy that supports all young people, but rather a form of resilience which promotes the ‘steeling’ of young people; making them stronger and more resistant to adversities. These adversities, we conclude, may be preventable within a more just social order.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document