NEONATAL SEPARATION: THE MATERNAL SIDE OF INTERACTIONAL DEPRIVATION

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 650-650
Author(s):  
Clicord R. Barnett ◽  
P. Herbert Leiderman ◽  
Rose Grobstein ◽  
Marshall Klaus
Keyword(s):  
February Issue ◽  
Neonatal Separation ◽  
Maternal Side

On page 197 of the February issue Dr. Barnett's name should have been spelled Clifford.

THE MOTHER'S TIE TO HER CHILD

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-191
Author(s):  
Julius B. Richmond
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Behavior ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Early Report ◽  
Focused Attention ◽  
Early Experiences ◽  
John Bowlby ◽  
Significant Interference ◽  
Neonatal Separation ◽  
Maternal Side

Several years ago John Bowlby wrote a paper entitled "The Nature of the Child's Tie to His Mother."1 This and the growing literature on "imprinting" pioneered by the ethologists have focused attention on the significances of early experiences for the development of the young organism-human and nonhuman. The nature of "the mother's tie to the child" has not received as much attention. Therefore, it is heartening to note an early report of a study, "Neonatal Separation: The Maternal Side of Interactional Deprivation," in this issue.2 Maternal behavior has been explored thus far mainly in animal studies. Some years ago we demonstrated that brief separation of newborn goats from their mothers resulted in a significant interference with the specificity of the mother's affection for her young.3

January/February Issue

CFA Magazine ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-74 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
February Issue

Revisiting E = mc2 and the February issue

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 259-259
Author(s):  
Edw. S. Ginsberg
Keyword(s):  
February Issue

Comments on the dilemma in the February issue: ‘Violent vet’

In Practice ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-143
Author(s):  
Shawn Kozlov
Keyword(s):  
February Issue

Response and Responsibility

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 864-864
Author(s):  
ROBERT S. GANELIN
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
Objective Information ◽  
Original Thinking ◽  
February Issue

I find the letter of Dr. Stowens which was published in the February issue of Pediatrics (35:355) an extremely disturbing one; not because of its defense of original thinking which is being followed by appropriate, controlled observations, but for its petulant rebuke of an honest request for objective information. It is true that the inquiring physician will make observations regarding poorly understood illnesses and develop therapeutic approaches therefrom. The person who stops at this point, however, deludes himself regarding his objectivity and becomes a menace to his patients.

Hired Guns and Malpractice Cases

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 958-958
Author(s):  
Arlan L. Rosenbloom
Keyword(s):  
Medical Expertise ◽  
February Issue

I have just read Gloria Schrager's letter in the February issue on medical expertise and John Kattwinkel's reply. My own experience as an expert for both plaintiffs and defendants is littered with examples of "hired guns" testimony by our colleagues. Those of us who have been appalled by this behavior and would be willing to sign contributions about offensive experiences might be able to make a difference. Certainly the lawyers' services will find these articles and would be able to eventually discover who the author was talking about.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document