scholarly journals ISCHEMIA Trial: Key Questions and Answers

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Lopez-Sendon ◽  
Raúl Moreno ◽  
Juan Tamargo

A healthy lifestyle, myocardial revascularisation and medical therapy constitute the three pillars for the treatment of ischaemic heart disease. Lifestyle and optimal medical therapy should be used in all cases. However, the selection of cases for revascularisation among stable patients remains controversial. The ISCHEMIA trial compared an early invasive strategy with revascularisation plus optimal medical therapy against initial optimal medical therapy alone with revascularisation reserved for cases in which symptom control was insufficient. The study included over 5,000 patients with stable coronary artery disease and moderate to severe myocardial ischaemia. No differences were found in relevant clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, MI, heart failure and stroke, over a follow-up of 3.2 years. Conversely, angina control was better in patients with severe symptomatic angina. Following the tradition of all trials comparing medical therapy alone with revascularisation, the ISCHEMIA trial results are controversial, but an analysis of the design and results of the trial offers important information to better understand, evaluate and treat the growing number of patients with stable chronic ischaemic heart disease and moderate to severe myocardial ischaemia.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Dagan ◽  
D Dinh ◽  
J Stehli ◽  
C Tan ◽  
A Brennan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Left ventricular dysfunction and ischaemic heart disease are common amongst women, however, women tend to present later and are less likely to receive guideline-directed medical therapy compared to their male counterparts. Purpose To investigate if a sex discrepancy exists for optimal medical therapy (OMT) and long-term mortality in a cohort of patients with known ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and left ventricular dysfunction. Methods We analysed prospectively collected data from a multicentre registry database collected between 2005–2018 on pharmacotherapy 30-days post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 13,015 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. OMT at 30-days was defined as beta-blocker (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) ± mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Long-term mortality was determined by linkage with the National Death Index, with median follow up of 4.7 (IQR 2.0–8.6) years. Results Mean age was 65±12 years; women represented 20.2% (2,634) of the cohort. Women were on average 5 years older, had higher average BMI, higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, renal dysfunction, prior stroke and rheumatoid arthritis. Men were more likely to have sleep apnoea, be current/ex-smokers and to have had prior myocardial infarction, PCI and bypass surgery. Overall, 72.3% (9,411) of patients were on OMT, which was similar between sexes (72.7% in women vs. 72.2% in men, p=0.58). Rates of BB therapy were similar between sexes (85.2% vs. 84.5%, p=0.38), while women were less likely to be on an ACEi/ARB (80.4% vs. 82.4%, p=0.02) and more likely to be on a MRA (12.1% vs. 10.0%, p=0.003). Amongst those with LVEF ≤35% (n=1,652), BB (88.7% vs. 87.3%, p=0.46), ACEi/ARB (83.3% vs. 82.1%, p=0.59) and MRA use (32.5% vs. 33.3%, p=0.78) was comparable. Aspirin use was similar between sexes (95.3% vs. 95.9%, p=0.12), while women were less likely to be on statin therapy (93.5% vs. 95.3%, p<0.001) and a second antiplatelet agent (94.4% vs. 95.6%, p=0.007). On unadjusted analysis women had significantly higher long-term mortality of 25.4% compared to 19.0% for men (p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis out to 14 years demonstrated that men on OMT have the best long-term survival overall and women on sub-OMT have significantly poorer outcomes compared to men on sub-OMT. However, after adjusting for OMT and other comorbidities there was no difference in long-term mortality between sexes (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87–1.14, p=0.94). Conclusion From this large multicentre registry, we found similar rates of guideline-directed pharmacotherapy for left ventricular dysfunction between sexes, however women were less likely to be on appropriate IHD secondary prevention. The increased unadjusted long-term mortality amongst women is likely due to differing baseline risk, given that adjusted mortality was similar between sexes. Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4S) ◽  
pp. 104-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Kochergin ◽  
V. I. Ganyukov

Background. Today, a number of unresolved issues remain regarding vulnerable coronary plaques, one of which is the need for preventive revascularization.Aim. Evaluation of the appropriateness of preventive revascularization of functionally insignificant lesions of the coronary arteries with signs of vulnerability according to the virtual histology of intravascular ultrasound in patients with stable coronary artery disease.Methods. The prospective randomized study includes patients with stable coronary artery disease and isolated intermediate-grade coronary stenosis. The first step in patients is measured fractional flow reserve to confirm the hemodynamic insignificance of stenosis. Then an intravascular ultrasound is performed to verify signs of plaque vulnerability: a thin-cap fibroatheroma and / or minimum lumen area <4 mm2 and/or plaque burden >70%. After that, patients are randomized into two groups: preventive revascularization or optimal medical therapy. After 12 months, patients undergo repeated intravascular ultrasound and end-point analysis.Results. So far, 10 patients have been included in the study (6 in the preventive revascularization group and 4 in the optimal medical therapy group). No endpoints and complications were recorded in both groups in 30-days follow-up.Conclusion. Intravascular imaging methods can identify vulnerable coronary plaques, which allows you to use a personalized approach in determining treatment tactics, one of which can be preventive revascularization.


Author(s):  
Bernhard L Gerber ◽  
Mouaz H Al-Mallah ◽  
Joao AC Lima ◽  
Mohammad R Ostovaneh

Chronic ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is one of the most common cardiac conditions worldwide and is generally caused by the consequences of coronary atherosclerosis, including myocardial infarction. Clinical challenges in chronic IHD include detection of myocardial ischaemia in symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), evaluation of myocardial viability in patients with established IHD and poor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) when revascularization is considered, as well as risk stratification and identification of patients with chronic IHD at high risk of complications. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can provide vital answers to all three of these challenges. Stress CMR is now increasingly used to detect ischaemia by means of vasodilator stress perfusion or dobutamine stress contractile reserve stress imaging. For viability assessment, late gadolinium enhancement is currently the method of choice to detect myocardial infarction, and low-dose dobutamine stress magnetic resonance can provide additional information to determine viability and guide therapy. Cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic IHD is mainly determined by left ventricular function, most commonly utilizing LVEF, as well as infarct size, infarct characteristics, and ischaemic burden, which can all be measured reliably with CMR. This chapter will review the role of CMR for the detection of myocardial ischaemia, viability, and risk.


Author(s):  
Anthea Hatfield

Cardiovascular disease is common and patients coming to recovery room with any of these common problems will need special care. The essential signs and symptoms of hypertension, cardiac failure, ischaemic heart disease, and valvular heart disease are outlined. The actions and side-effects of the drugs that these patients take to control their symptoms are described. Recognizing and treating hypotension and myocardial ischaemia are very important and relevant, and they are fully discussed in this chapter.


2015 ◽  
Vol 116 (5) ◽  
pp. 671-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soohun Chun ◽  
Feng Qiu ◽  
Peter C. Austin ◽  
Dennis T. Ko ◽  
Muhammad Mamdani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document