Ongoing Late Lumen Loss with the CYPHER and TAXUS Drug-eluting Stents Supports a Theory of Catch-up Restenosis

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
James Gilbart ◽  

Luminal loss and restenosis are critical problems in coronary artery drug-eluting stents (DES). These implants need to minimise long-term neointimal coverage and maximise blood flow. Two studies compared the effects of different types of DES on lumen loss after surgical implantation. The first study included 2,030 patients and showed that over two years late luminal loss (termed ‘late luminal creep’) progressed for two types of commercially prepared permanent polymer stents containing rapamycin or paclitaxel (CYPHER and TAXUS), but not for a polymer-free in-house coated stent containing rapamycin (YUKON). In a smaller study, luminal coverage was lower with the CYPHER than with the YUKON stent, but struts of the stent structure were better covered with the YUKON stent and less likely to cause an obstruction. Stents should ideally limit luminal loss but also allow for sufficient coverage to prevent thrombotic hazards.

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryota Sakurai ◽  
Brian K Courtney ◽  
Masao Yamasaki ◽  
Ichizo Tsujino ◽  
Katsuhisa Waseda ◽  
...  

Background The amount of neointimal hyperplasia as well as the percentage of neointimal stent surface coverage may be different among various types of drug-eluting stents (DES). Methods From the Stanford University Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Core Laboratory database, this study consisted of the patients enrolled in prospective, multicenter clinical trials with DES deployment for de novo coronary lesions and 3-D IVUS at 8- to 9-month follow-up as part of their study protocol. In these cases, 155 single DES: (1) an 18-mm everolimus-eluting (EES, 52 stents in 50 patients); (2) an 18-mm sirolimus-eluting (SES, 51 stents); or (3) a 16-mm paclitaxel-eluting (PES, 52 stents) stent in 153 patients were investigated. Using Simpson’s rule, %neointimal volume was defined as neointimal volume / stent volume × 100. Circumferential stent length covered with neointima (L N ) and stent perimeter (L S ) were also measured at every 1-mm cross section throughout the stent. Then, %neointimal coverage was defined as total L N / total L S × 100. Results EES had comparable %neointimal volume to SES, but less %neointimal volume than PES (5.2±5.3 vs 2.6±4.0 vs 9.2±8.7%, P< 0.0001), whereas EES had greater %neointimal coverage than SES, but comparable %neointimal coverage to PES (25.7±19.9 vs 9.1±14.6 vs 29.3±23.5%, P< 0.0001). Conclusions Compared to SES, EES had comparable neointimal hyperplasia, but greater neointimal stent coverage by IVUS. Compared to PES, EES had less neointimal hyperplasia, but comparable neointimal stent coverage by IVUS. This unique pattern of neointimal hyperplasia with these platforms may be important to the balance of the short-term efficacy and the long-term safety.


2019 ◽  
Vol 214 ◽  
pp. 46-53
Author(s):  
Lonnie T. Sullivan ◽  
Hillary Mulder ◽  
Karen Chiswell ◽  
Linda K. Shaw ◽  
Tracy Y. Wang ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (13) ◽  
pp. E120
Author(s):  
Hiromasa Otake ◽  
Toshiro Shinke ◽  
Junya Shite ◽  
Ken&ndash;ichi Hirata

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document