scholarly journals THE IMPACT OF MID-TERM OCT FINDINGS ON LONG-TERM CLINICAL EVENTS AFTER DRUG-ELUTING STENTS IMPLANTATION

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (13) ◽  
pp. E120
Author(s):  
Hiromasa Otake ◽  
Toshiro Shinke ◽  
Junya Shite ◽  
Ken–ichi Hirata
PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e106450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio G. Stefanini ◽  
Masanori Taniwaki ◽  
Bindu Kalesan ◽  
Lorenz Räber ◽  
Stefan Stortecky ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Pilgrim ◽  
Florian Vetterli ◽  
Bindu Kalesan ◽  
Giulio G. Stefanini ◽  
Lorenz Räber ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 631-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohei Sotomi ◽  
Satoshi Suzuki ◽  
Tomoaki Kobayashi ◽  
Yuma Hamanaka ◽  
Shimpei Nakatani ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Moreira ◽  
Amanda Sousa ◽  
José Costa ◽  
Ricardo Costa ◽  
Manuel Cano ◽  
...  

Background: Diabetic patients are traditionally related to higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention even in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era. We sought to evaluate the impact of diabetes status in the very long-term clinical outcomes after DES implantation in a complex, non-selected diabetic cohort. Methods and Results: Between May/2002 and May/2007, 2,500 patients treated exclusively with DES were consecutively enrolled in the non-randomized, single-center DESIRE Registry. Among them, 1,705 elective patients have completed 6 month-follow-up and were divided into 3 groups according to their Diabetes mellitus status. Primary endpoint was long-term combined MACE and stent thrombosis rate classified according to ARC definitions. Clinical follow-up was obtained at 1, 6 and 12 months and then annually up to 6 years. Mean follow-up time was 2.6±1.2 years and was achieved in 98% of the eligible cohort. Baseline clinical and procedure characteristics as well as late outcomes are displayed in the table . In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, Diabetes mellitus (OR=1.45; 95%Confidence interval-CI 1.00 –2.11) and moderate/severe calcification at lesion site (OR=3.06;95%CI,1.47– 6.34) were independent predictors of MACE . Conclusions: In the DESIRE registry both insulin and non-insulin requiring diabetics carried poorer long-term outcomes (MACE) when compared to non-diabetic patients. Importantly, there was a tendency for higher stent thrombosis among diabetics. However, the type of diabetes (insulin vs. non-insulin) did not seem to impact the prognosis of PCI with DES.


2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif A. Al Nooryani ◽  
Nagwa A. Abdelrahman ◽  
Hatem A. Helmy ◽  
Yehia T. Kishk ◽  
Ayman K. M. Hassan

Abstract Background Optical coherence tomography showed a great ability to identify adverse features during percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents and resulted in better clinical outcomes. The study aimed to assess the impact of optical coherence tomography on intraoperative decision-making during implantation of Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus drug-eluting stents. Results We performed an observational study that included 223 consecutive patients post optical coherence tomography-guided implantation of either Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds (162 patients) or everolimus drug-eluting stents (61 patients). We studied the influence of optical coherence tomography on intraoperative decision-making during implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds versus drug-eluting stents by analyzing the total rate of optical coherence tomography-dependent modifications in each device. After satisfactory angiographic results, the total rate of required intervention for optical coherence tomography detected complications was significantly higher in the bioresorbable scaffolds arm compared to drug-eluting stents arm (47.8% versus 32.9%, respectively; p = 0.019). The additional modifications encompassed further optimization in the case of device underexpansion or struts malapposition, and even stenting in the case of strut fractures, or significant edge dissection. Conclusions Compared to drug-eluting stents, Absord scaffold was associated with a significantly higher rate of optical coherence tomography-identified intraprocedural complications necessitating further modifications. The study provides some hints on the reasons of scaffolds failure in current PCI practice; it offers a new insight for the enhancement of BRS safety and presents and adds to the growing literature for successful BRS utilization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document