scholarly journals The Performance of Mixed Manufacturer Metal On Metal Total Hip Replacements

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Barker Cook ◽  
Jeremy M. Latham ◽  
Robert J.K. Wood

Using a femoral head from one manufacturer on the stem of another manufacturer poses the risk that the taper interface between the components may not contact correctly and the performance of the joint will be impaired. The cohorts in this study are a combination of modular Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) and Adept femoral heads on CPT stems. The study reviews the geometry of the taper interfaces to establish if the taper clearance angles was outside of the normal range for other taper interfaces. In addition the rates of material loss from the bearings and taper and a ranking of the stem damage were reviewed to determine if the levels of loss were above that seen for other similar joints. The material loss analysis demonstrated that the rates or levels of loss from the bearings, taper and stem were no different to levels published for manufacturer matched joints and in many cases were lower. The results demonstrate that the taper clearance angles for the mixed manufacturer joints (BHR-CPT: 0.067 to -0.116, Adept-CPT: 0.101 to -0.056) were within the range of other studies and manufacturer matched clearances (0.134 to -0.149).Using components from different manufacturers has not in this instance increased the level of material loss from the joints, when compared to other similar manufacturer matched joints.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1677-1685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley K. Matthies ◽  
Radu Racasan ◽  
Paul Bills ◽  
Liam Blunt ◽  
Suzie Cro ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 88-91
Author(s):  
J Lloyd ◽  
I Starks ◽  
T Wainwright ◽  
R Middleton

Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacings (HRs) and large head total hip replacements (LHTHRs) were perceived by many as a surgical revolution, with clear advantages over the traditional metal-on-polyethylene total hip replacement (THR). This is especially the case for younger, active individuals in whom conventional THR has been associated with higher rates of aseptic loosening. In addition to less bearing surface wear, frequently cited advantages for HR include the preservation of femoral bone stock, lower dislocation rates, and superior function and activity scores.


2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 1173-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
INGRID MILOŠEV ◽  
RIHARD TREBŠE ◽  
SIMON KOVAČ ◽  
ANDREJ CÖR ◽  
VENČESLAV PIŠOT

1998 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-154
Author(s):  
Koji Hiraoka ◽  
Fujio Higuchi ◽  
Rikimaru Kawabata ◽  
Akio Inoue

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 513-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Joyce ◽  
Harry Grigg ◽  
David J. Langton ◽  
Antoni V.F. Nargol

Author(s):  
Douglas M. Doud ◽  
Preston R. Beck ◽  
Donald R. Petersen ◽  
Jack E. Lemons ◽  
Alan W. Eberhardt

Postoperative dislocation of total hip replacements has been documented to occur at a rate of approximately 2.4–3.9% [1–3]. Such events may result in the transfer of titanium from the acetabular cup to the femoral head, both during the dislocation and surgical reduction of the dislocated joint [3,4]. If the head is reduced with this transfer present, the joint life expectancy, which depends on articulating surfaces remaining smooth, is reduced [4]. Although the presence of metal transfer on retrieved femoral heads after dislocation is documented, no previous studies have attempted to quantify the forces or contact stresses at which metal transfer occurs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document