Late Failure of a Polyethylene Unicompartmental Knee Insert -Retrieval Analysis Protocol and Results

This study reports the investigation of a degraded polyethylene insert retrieved after the catastrophic failure of a mobile bearing knee implant, occurred after a traumatic event and leading to a late revision. Understanding wear mechanisms of polyethylene components is important to improve the implants for joint replacement. This model of unicompartmental arthroplasty, due to its mobile, congruent insert and design, has the potential to attain low rates of wear, leading to an improved survival of the prosthesis over fixed-bearing knee implants. During the surgical technique, however, it is critical to avoid any source of impingement or incongruent articulation, as this are associated with increased rates of polyethylene wear and may contribute to the early necessity for revision surgery. The investigated insert presented a macroscopic fragmentation, surface and bulk defects and debris. Characterization of the retrieved polyethylene implant fragments was performed by macroscopic examination, by scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Due to a systematic retrieval analysis according to current standards, we can question that, in our case, third body wear is rarely pure bone or pure cement debris related but a combination of the two mentioned. The combination enhanced contribution of polyethylene debris in severe wear initiation and progression. Complete examination of the explants exhibiting breakage or severe wear may help in understanding pathogenic ways of failure in unicompartmental knee.

Comparative retrieval analysis of antioxidant polyethylene: bonding of vitamin-E does not reduce in-vivo surface damage

Background With the Persona® knee system a new polyethylene formulation incorporating vitamin-E which aims to reduce oxidation and maintain wear resistance was introduced. Although in-vitro studies have demonstrated positive effects of the vitamin-E antioxidants on UHMWPE, no retrieval study has looked at polyethylene damage of this system yet. It was the aim to investigate the in-vivo performance of this new design, by comparing it with its predecessor in retrieval analysis. Methods 15 NexGen® and 8 Persona® fixed-bearing implants from the same manufacturer (Zimmer Biomet) were retrieved from two knee revision centres. For retrieval analysis, a macroscopic analysis of polyethylene using a peer-reviewed damage grading method was used (Hood-score). The roughness of all articulating metal components was measured using a contact profilometer. The reason(s) for TKA revision were recorded. Statistical analyses (t-test) were performed to investigate differences between the two designs. Results The mean Hood score for Persona® inserts was 109.3 and for NexGen® 115.1 without significant differences between the two designs. Results from the profilometer revealed that Persona® and NexGen® femoral implants showed an identical mean surface roughness of 0.14 μm. The Persona® tibial tray showed a significantly smoother surface (0.06 μm) compared to the NexGen® (0.2 μm; p < 0.001). Both Hood score and surface roughness were influenced by the reasons for revision (p < 0.01). Conclusions The bonding of the antioxidant vitamin-E to the PE chain used in the novel Persona® knee system does not reduce in-vivo surface damage compared to highly crosslinked PE without supplemented vitamin-E used in its predecessor knee system NexGen®. However, the Persona® titanium alloy tibial tray showed a significantly smoother surface in comparison to the NexGen® titanium alloy tibial tray. This study provides first retrieval findings of a novel TKA design and may help to understand how the new Persona® anatomic knee system performs in vivo.

Dissociation of polyethylene liners with the Depuy Pinnacle cup: a report of 26 cases

Background: Although the Pinnacle Acetabular Hip System (DePuy Synthes) has demonstrated excellent survivorship results since it was first introduced in 2003, there have been a growing number of cases indicating that Pinnacle liners may be subject to a higher-than-expected rate of early dissociation failure. Between 2006 and 2020, our Centre received 212 retrieved Pinnacle liners from Western Australian hospitals. Of these, 26 were removed due to liner dissociation. Methods: To better understand the frequency and cause of this complication we assessed all retrieved Pinnacle acetabular components for type, damage modes and patient demographics. The leverage force required to dissociate Pinnacle liners was also measured and compared with another commonly used acetabular system, the Trident (Stryker Orthopaedics). Results: The estimated minimum incidence of liner dissociation from our data was 0.35%. Characterisation of dissociated Pinnacle cases (n = 26) revealed 73% were female with an average age of 59 compared to all retrieved Pinnacle cases (n = 212) where 58% were female with an average age of 66. Retrieval analysis indicated plastic deformation of the liner into an ovoid shape, signs of impingement on the rim postero-superiorly and shearing of the liner’s anti-rotation tabs was common. Mechanical testing indicated that the dissociation strength of Pinnacle cups decreases at approximately 6.6 N/year in situ (p = 0.01). Conclusion: The survival rate of Pinnacle acetabular cups is exceptional with only 5% revised at 10 years. However, surgeons should be aware of the clinical symptoms and high-risk demographics when assessing patients with polyethylene Pinnacle liners.