scholarly journals Use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with acute respiratory failure in emergency departments: a systematized review

2021 ◽  
Vol 106 (106(813)) ◽  
pp. 188-197
Author(s):  
M.R. Matabuena-Gómez-Limón ◽  
F. Leiva-Cepas
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Early Management ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Nasal Cannulae ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Hospitalization Period

The aim of this study si to revise the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with acute respiratory failure in emergency departments. A systematized database review will be carried out by the search of articles attending the presented subject following a unique approach; restricting the results to findings in the last five years either in Spanish or English. A research performed in paediatric population concluded that the early management of acute respiratory failure and the use of high flow nasal cannulae reduced the hospitalization period and the referral to specialized hospitals, and gave more independence to regional hospitals in its management; reducing, therefore, the number of patients needing the implementation of invasive procedures. With respect to patients with exacerbations of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and its early management in the prehospital care, an increase in the mortality in those patients who were exposed to high flow compared to the conventional oxygen therapy was observed. Following the results of a meta-analysis, no benefits were found in the use of high flow nasal cannulae opposed to the conventional therapy or NIV in the emergency departments, in terms of need for intubations, failures in the treatment, hospitalization and mortality.The data are inconclusive in all the studies analyzed and there is no agreement between the different authors. There is a scarce piece of bibliography regarding the use of NIV in the emergency departments due to the fact that the majority of the research are focused on the use of this techniques in intensive care units. In conclussion, there is a diversity in the results of the revised articles according to the use of NIV in the emergency departments.

scholarly journals Comparison of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation in ICU patients with acute respiratory failure and a do-not-intubate orders: a multicentre prospective study OXYPAL

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e045659
Author(s):  
René Robert ◽  
Denis Frasca ◽  
Julie Badin ◽  
C Girault ◽  
Christophe Guitton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Registration Number

IntroductionA palliative approach to intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute respiratory failure and a do-not-intubate order corresponds to a poorly evaluated target for non-invasive oxygenation treatments. Survival alone should not be the only target; it also matters to avoid discomfort and to restore the patient’s quality of life. We aim to conduct a prospective multicentre observational study to analyse clinical practices and their impact on outcomes of palliative high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFOT) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in ICU patients with do-not-intubate orders.Methods and analysisThis is an investigator-initiated, multicentre prospective observational cohort study comparing the three following strategies of oxygenation: HFOT alone, NIV alternating with HFOT and NIV alternating with standard oxygen in patients admitted in the ICU for acute respiratory failure with a do-not-intubate order. The primary outcome is the hospital survival within 14 days after ICU admission in patients weaned from NIV and HFOT. The sample size was estimated at a minimum of 330 patients divided into three groups according to the oxygenation strategy applied. The analysis takes into account confounding factors by modelling a propensity score.Ethics and disseminationThe study has been approved by the ethics committee and patients will be included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03673631

scholarly journals Awake Prone Positioning, High-Flow Nasal Oxygen and Non-Invasive Ventilation as Non-Invasive Respiratory Strategies in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 391
Author(s):  
Benedikt Schmid ◽  
Mirko Griesel ◽  
Anna-Lena Fischer ◽  
Carolina S. Romero ◽  
Maria-Inti Metzendorf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Intubation Rate ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation

Background: Acute respiratory failure is the most important organ dysfunction of COVID-19 patients. While non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen are frequently used, efficacy and safety remain uncertain. Benefits and harms of awake prone positioning (APP) in COVID-19 patients are unknown. Methods: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HFNC vs. NIV and APP vs. standard care. We meta-analyzed data for mortality, intubation rate, and safety. Results: Five RCTs (2182 patients) were identified. While it remains uncertain whether HFNC compared to NIV alters mortality (RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.65–1.33), HFNC may increase rate of intubation or death (composite endpoint; RR 1.22, 1.03–1.45). We do not know if HFNC alters risk for harm. APP compared to standard care probably decreases intubation rate (RR 0.83, 0.71–0.96) but may have little or no effect on mortality (RR: 1.08, 0.51–2.31). Conclusions: Certainty of evidence is moderate to very low. There is no compelling evidence for either HFNC or NIV, but both carry substantial risk for harm. The use of APP probably has benefits although mortality appears unaffected.

scholarly journals High-flow oxygen therapy versus non-invasive ventilation: a randomised physiological cross-over study of alveolar recruitment in acute respiratory failure

2021 ◽  
pp. 00373-2021
Author(s):  
Elise Artaud-Macari ◽  
Michael Bubenheim ◽  
Gurvan Le Bouar ◽  
Dorothée Carpentier ◽  
Steven Grangé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Alveolar Recruitment ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Lung Volumes ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy has recently shown clinical benefits in hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients, while the interest of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) remains debated. The primary endpoint was to compare alveolar recruitment using global end-expiratory electrical lung impedance (EELI) between HFNC and NIV. Secondary endpoints compared regional EELI, lung volumes (global and regional tidal volume variation (TV)), respiratory parameters, hemodynamic tolerance, dyspnea and patient comfort between HFNC and NIV, relative to face mask (FM).A prospective randomised cross-over physiological study was conducted in patients with hypoxemic ARF due to pneumonia. They received alternately HFNC, NIV and FM.Sixteen patients were included. Global EELI was 4083 with NIV and 2921 with HFNC (p=0.4). Compared to FM, NIV and HFNC significantly increased global EELI by 1810.5 (95%CI: (857; 2646)) and 826 (95%CI: (399.5; 2361)) respectively. Global and regional TV increased significantly with NIV compared to HFNC or FM, but not between HFNC and FM. NIV yielded a significantly higher SpO2/ FiO2 ratio compared to HFNC (p=0.03). No significant difference was observed between HFNC, NIV and FM for dyspnea. Patient comfort score with FM was not significantly different than with HFNC (p=0.1) but was lower with NIV (p=0.001).This study suggests a potential benefit of HFNC and NIV on alveolar recruitment in patients with hypoxemic ARF. In contrast with HFNC, NIV increased lung volumes which may contribute to overdistension and its potentially deleterious effect in these patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document