scholarly journals Mulligan Versus Conventional Neurodynamic Mobilization in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy - A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amita Aggarwal ◽  
Ruvitte Gomes ◽  
Tushar J Palekar
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Vietnamese herbal medicine (TD0019) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: A double-blind phase-2 randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 101060
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Thu Ha ◽  
Nguyen Lam Vuong ◽  
Trinh Thi Lua ◽  
Trang Thi Minh Nguyen ◽  
Duong Trong Nghia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Holy ◽  
Anna MacDowall ◽  
Freyr Gauti Sigmundsson ◽  
Claes Olerud
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Treatment Recommendation ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Anterior Cervical Decompression ◽  
Posterior Foraminotomy

Abstract Background Cervical radiculopathy is the most common disease in the cervical spine, affecting patients around 50–55 year of age. An operative treatment is common clinical praxis when non-operative treatment fails. The controversy is in the choice of operative treatment, conducting either anterior cervical decompression and fusion or posterior foraminotomy. The study objective is to evaluate short- and long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and posterior foraminotomy (PF) Methods A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial with 1:1 randomization, ACDF vs. PF including 110 patients. The primary aim is to evaluate if PF is non-inferior to ACDF using a non-inferiority design with ACDF as “active control.” The neck disability index (NDI) is the primary outcome measure, and duration of follow-up is 2 years. Discussion Due to absence of high level of evidence, the authors believe that a RCT will improve the evidence for using the different surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy and strengthen current surgical treatment recommendation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04177849. Registered on November 26, 2019

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document