Analyses on the Scope of Consumer Contracts Protected by Article 27 of the Private International Law and Requirements for Being a Passive Consumer

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-231
Author(s):  
이헌묵
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Consumer Contracts

scholarly journals Consumer contracts in the European Court of Justice case law. Latest trends = Los contratos de consumo en la jurisprudencia del TJUE. Últimas tendencias

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Alfonso-Luis Calvo Caravaca
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Consumer Contract ◽  
Mass Consumption ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
European Court ◽  
Social Landscape ◽  
Consumer Contracts ◽  
Private Individual

Abstract: The concept of “consumer” is, in theory, a restrictive concept. However, the ECJ has now extended it to cases in which a private individual has gone on to practice as a professional in an manifest, public and conspicuous manner. Judgment ECJ 25 January 2018, C-498/16, Facebook proves it. In relation to consumers of financial products, the ECJ skillfully pulls strings in the context of art. 7.2 BR I-bis; however, that norm is totally insensitive with regards to the consumer. The future is stepping forward towards online mass consumption, and in the present virtual social landscape it is necessary for the ECJ to open up new ways of protecting the consumer that keep up with times. In this context, it is necessary that future amendments to the Brussels I-bis Regulation incorporate the concepts that the ECJ has created in relation to jurisdiction in the cross-border consumer sector: the concepts of “act of consumption”, “consumer”, “professional”, and “directed activity”, for example, should stop being jurisprudential concepts to become legal concepts.Keywords: act of consumption, consumer, consumer contract, cross-border consumer sector, directed activity, dual contracts with both private and professional purpose, (international) jurisdiction, Private International Law, professional.Resumen: El concepto de “consumidor” es, en teoría, un concepto restrictivo. Sin embargo, el TJUE lo ha extendido a casos en los que un particular, en el momento presente, ha pasado a ejercer como profesional de manera evidente, pública y notoria. La STJUE 25 enero 2018, C-498/16, Facebook, es la prueba. En relación con los consumidores de productos financieros, el TJUE mueve sus hilos con destreza en el contexto del art. 7.2 RB I-bis, pero este precepto es totalmente insensible al consumidor. El futuro camina digitalmente hacia un consumo masivo online y en dicho paisaje social virtual es necesario que el TJUE abra vías de protección al consumidor de un modo evolutivo. En dicho contexto, es preciso que futuras reformas del Reglamento Bruselas I-bis incorporen los conceptos que el TJUE ha creado en relación con la competencia judicial en el sector del consumo transfronterizo: los conceptos de “acto de consumo”, “consumidor”, “profesional”, y “actividad dirigida”, por ejemplo, deberían dejar de ser conceptos jurisprudenciales para pasar a ser conceptos legales.Palabras clave: acto de consumo, competencia judicial internacional, consumidor, consumo transfronterizo, contrato de consumidores, contratos con doble finalidad profesional y privada, Derecho internacional privado, profesional, actividad dirigida.

scholarly journals Validity of choice of court agreements, abusive terms in air carriage contracts, assignments and compensation, is there room for anyone else? (Comments on CJEU Judgment Delayfix, c-519/19)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 882-895
Author(s):  
Anna María Ruiz Martín
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Consumer Contracts ◽  
Business To Consumer ◽  
Substantive Law ◽  
First Time ◽  
The Eu

In Delayfix case, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has interpreted the formal and substantive validity of a “choice of court agreement” included in an air carriage of passenger’s contract. But, for the first time, the CJEU has openly declared the unfair nature of these choice of court agreements, not only for the passengers, but also for third parties assigned by them. In opposition with former case law on the effects of a choice of court agreement for assignees. In carriage of passengers’ contracts, third parties are usually agencies devoted to the defense of air passenger rights and collection of credits who claim for the compensation rights in accordance with the rights conferred by Regulation 261/2004. From the EU Private International Law approach, the preliminary ruling is of interest, being the Brussels I bis regulation the instrument for clarifying whether this choice of court agreement should be deemed as enforceable or not, regarding the requirements of Article 25 Brussels I bis due to these contracts are not considered as consumer contracts. To the analysis of the merits and substantive law, contrarily than under EU Private International law rules these contracts are considered as Business to consumer (B2C) contracts, and Directive 93/13/CEE and other EU Consumer rules must be applied so as to determine the unfair nature of these clauses in these contracts.

scholarly journals CONSUMER PROTECTION LEGISLATION AND PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW

Obiter ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan L Neels
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
South African ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Electronic Communications ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
Protection Legislation ◽  
Consumer Contracts ◽  
National Credit Act

Although South African private international law is primarily based on bilateral and multilateral reference rules, the legislator in recent consumer protection legislation rather employs unilateral conflict rules by the identification of rules of immediate application and in the form of scope rules. The relevant provisions in the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002, the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 and the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 are discussed, together with the role that the traditional conflict rules still play. A new rule of private international law for consumer contracts is proposed; in this regard the principle of preferential treatmentwill play a role in the context of alternative reference rules.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document