scholarly journals The Bureau of Land Management and cultural resource management in Oregon

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Cannon
1999 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 34-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Winthrop

We anthropologists often feel like interlopers in the world of public policy. Too often we discover that the seats at the table have already been taken by economists, lawyers, and political scientists. Yet there are certain areas where for better or worse anthropologists are acknowledged as the policy "experts." One of these rare professional quasi-monopolies is termed (in America's bureaucratic fed-speak) "cultural resource management," a line of work that employs significant numbers of both archaeologists and ethnographers. Broadly, cultural resource management involves the protection of archeological sites on federal lands (such as timber lands controlled by the Forest Service, or grazing lands controlled by the Bureau of Land Management) or on projects requiring federal funding or permitting (such as dams or highways). But cultural resource management also involves the protection of places of "traditional cultural value." Primarily these are sites with traditional significance for American Indian communities.


Author(s):  
Hannah Cobb ◽  
Karina Croucher

This book provides a radical rethinking of the relationships between teaching, researching, digging, and practicing as an archaeologist in the twenty-first century. The issues addressed here are global and are applicable wherever archaeology is taught, practiced, and researched. In short, this book is applicable to everyone from academia to cultural resource management (CRM), from heritage professional to undergraduate student. At its heart, it addresses the undervaluation of teaching, demonstrating that this affects the fundamentals of contemporary archaeological practice, and is particularly connected to the lack of diversity in disciplinary demographics. It proposes a solution which is grounded in a theoretical rethinking of our teaching, training, and practice. Drawing upon the insights from archaeology’s current material turn, and particularly Deleuze and Guattari’s concept of assemblages, this volume turns the discipline of archaeology into the subject of investigation, considering the relationships between teaching, practice, and research. It offers a new perspective which prompts a rethinking of our expectations and values with regard to teaching, training, and doing archaeology, and ultimately argues that we are all constantly becoming archaeologists.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document