scholarly journals Point-of-Care Ultrasound Education for Pediatric Residents in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

MedEdPORTAL ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Good ◽  
Jonathan Orsborn ◽  
Timothy Stidham
2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 363-363
Author(s):  
Nathan Wiedemann ◽  
Russell Horowitz ◽  
Zena Harris ◽  
Michael Ruppe ◽  
Alexander Thai ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Reagan Lyman ◽  
Yoshikazu Yamaguchi ◽  
Alok Moharir ◽  
Alok Moharir ◽  
Joseph D. Tobias

For critically ill patients, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been rapidly adopted for use in emergency departments and critical care units for diagnostic purposes and to guide decision making. We present two unique clinical scenarios in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), one in which ultrasound was used as a diagnostic tool to identify pulmonary edema, and the other in which ultrasound was used to facilitate placement of a naso-duodenal tube for enteral feeding. The potential role of POCUS in the PICU is presented and its utility in these two unique clinical scenarios discussed. Although, many cases will still require further radiological tests, The success of POCUS lies in immediate diagnosis allowing at the spot therapeutic interventions without wasting precious time.Citation: Lyman R, Yamaguchi Y, Moharir A, Tobias JD. Utility of point-of-care ultrasound in the pediatric intensive care unit. Anaesth pain & intensive care 2019;23(3):314-317


2021 ◽  
pp. 088506662110478
Author(s):  
Laura A. Watkins ◽  
Sharon P. Dial ◽  
Seth J. Koenig ◽  
Dalibor N. Kurepa ◽  
Paul H. Mayo

Objectives: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in adult critical care environments has become the standard of care in many hospitals. A robust literature shows its benefits for both diagnosis and delivery of care. The utility of POCUS in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), however, is understudied. This study describes in a series of PICU patients the clinical indications, protocols, findings and impact of pediatric POCUS on clinical management. Design: Retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive POCUS scans performed by a PICU physician. Patients: Pediatric critical care patients who required POCUS scans over a 15-month period. Setting: The pediatric and cardiac ICUs at a tertiary pediatric care center. Interventions: Performance of a POCUS scan by a pediatric critical care attending with advanced training in ultrasonography. Measurement and Main Results: A total of 200 POCUS scans comprised of one or more protocols (lung and pleura, cardiac, abdominal, or vascular diagnostic protocols) were performed on 155 patients over a 15-month period. The protocols used for each scan reflected the clinical question to be answered. These 200 scans included 133 thoracic protocols, 110 cardiac protocols, 77 abdominal protocols, and 4 vascular protocols. In this series, 42% of scans identified pathology that required a change in therapy, 26% confirmed pathology consistent with the ongoing plans for new therapy, and 32% identified pathology that did not result in initiation of a new therapy. Conclusions: POCUS performed by a trained pediatric intensivist provided useful clinical information to guide patient management.


2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris P. Yang ◽  
Jennifer Leung ◽  
Elizabeth A. Hunt ◽  
Janet Serwint ◽  
Matt Norvell ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy M Tofil ◽  
Kim W Benner ◽  
Lynn Zinkan ◽  
Jeffrey Alten ◽  
Brian M Varisco ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective True pediatric emergencies are rare. Because resident work hours are restricted and national attention turns toward patient safety, teaching methods to improve physician performance and patient care are vital. We hypothesize that a critical-care simulation course will improve resident confidence and performance in critical-care situations. Interventions We developed a monthly pediatric intensive care unit simulation course for second-year pediatric residents that consisted of weekly 1-hour sessions during both of the residents' month-long pediatric intensive care unit rotations. All scenarios used high-fidelity pediatric simulators and immediate videotape-assisted debriefing sessions. In addition, simulated intraosseous line insertion and endotracheal intubations were also performed. Results All residents improved their comfort level and confidence in performing individual key resuscitation tasks. The largest improvements were seen with their perceived ability to intubate children and place intraosseous lines. Both of these skills improved from baseline and compared to third-year-resident controls who had pediatric intensive care unit rotations but no simulations (P = .05 and P = .07, respectively). Videotape reviews showed only 54% ± 12% of skills from a scenario checklist performed correctly. Conclusions Our simulation-based pediatric intensive care unit training course improves second-year pediatric residents' comfort level but not performance during codes, as well as their perceived intubation and intraosseous ability. Videotape reviews show discordance between objective performance and self-assessment. Further work is necessary to elucidate the reasons for this difference as well as the appropriate role for simulation in the new graduate medical education climate, and to create new teaching modalities to improve resident performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document