scholarly journals The Effect of Intense Drop Jumps from a Platform Physical Exercise on Muscle and Connective Tissue Damage / Didelės apimties šuolių nuo pakylos fizinio krūvio poveikis raumenų ir jungiamojo audinio pažaidai

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (89) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Sigitas Kamandulis ◽  
Vidas Paleckis ◽  
Saulius Rutkauskas ◽  
Albertas Skurvydas
1973 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. Johanson ◽  
R. C. Reynolds ◽  
T. C. Scott ◽  
A. K. Pierce

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio de C. Nogueira ◽  
Rodrigo G. S. Vale ◽  
André L. M. Gomes ◽  
Estélio H. M. Dantas

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Berger ◽  
Daniel Henning ◽  
Michael C. Hout

When it comes to experiencing pain, most people will agree that it is an uncomfortable sensation that we would rather avoid. Pain can vary in intensity—ranging from the mild sensation of stubbing your toe to the intense pain of a broken bone—and we generally think of it as a bad thing. But pain can be thought of in two ways: sometimes it is a warning signal that something is wrong with our bodies, but other times it is benign, meaning it is not an indication that something is necessarily wrong. Warning-signal pain occurs when certain areas of your body get hurt or experience tissue damage, like when a sibling accidentally closes the car door on your fingers. Benign pain, on the other hand, is the type of pain you feel during intense physical exercise, and as you will come to see, is not always something you need to avoid!


Parasitology ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 94 (S1) ◽  
pp. S101-S122 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Von Lichtenberg

SUMMARYThe inflammatory responses to lymphatic filariae and to Onchocerca volvulus are reviewed with particular attention to (1) evolutionary biology; (2) inflammatory host spectrum; (3) non-specific components; (4) immunoregulation; (5) immune evasion versus immunomodulation; (6) chronic tissue damage and scarring and (7) disease models. Basic principles of pathogenesis are emphasized, comparisons drawn with schistosome infection, and critical items of missing information are highlighted.


2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 46-48
Author(s):  
Guy S. Salvesen ◽  
Gillian Murphy ◽  
Hideaki Nagase

In the 1970s, the Strangeways Laboratory in Cambridge consisted of a small number of groups collectively focused on the mechanisms of pathological connective-tissue damage. One of these groups, headed by Alan Barrett, was breaking ground on the destruction of the protein components of the matrix and was therefore heavily involved in identifying and categorizing newly emerging types of tissue-degrading enzymes. These enzymes, which Alan Barrett urges scientists to call peptidases, are also commonly called proteases or proteinases*. In the early 1970s, there were about 100 described human peptidases, a reasonable sampling of the 500–600 now known in humans in the post-genomic age. Approximately 2% of the human genome encodes peptidases, and roughly 1% encodes proteins with the ability to inhibit these enzymes. As the peptidases developed different catalytic mechanisms to solve the problem of cleaving the notoriously stable peptide bond, so the families of protease inhibitors acquired distinct strategies to regulate peptidase action. The strategies are usually directed towards blocking the peptidase active site directly or, less commonly, by allosteric mechanisms. But perhaps the most bizarre mechanism is that performed by members of the protein clan exemplified by the human protein 2-macroglobulin (α2).


2016 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 76-83
Author(s):  
Rika Nailuvar Sinaga Sinaga ◽  
◽  
Herla Rusmarilin ◽  
T.Helvi Mardiani ◽  
Ayu Elvana ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document